Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:20:58.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory Evaluation of Piper guineense for the Protection of Cowpea Against Callosobruchus maculatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Julius I. Olaifa
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Ife, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Wilson O. Erhun
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Ife, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

The efficacy of the powder and volatile oil of Piper guineense Schum & Thonn at protecting cowpea against seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) was tested in the laboratory. At low concentrations the powder significantly reduced oviposition and adult emergence while oviposition was completely suppressed at a higher concentration of 42%. The same concentration provided adequate protection for the same amount of cowpea placed in containers of different volumes. The powder, however, did not show any fumigant effect. Volatile oil at 0.002 and 0.005% significantly reduced oviposition and adult emergence, while oviposition was completely suppressed at 0.02% and above. Weight loss of seeds at 90 days after treatment with volatile oil decreased as concentration of the oil increased. The practical significance of the results in small scale storage of cowpea is discussed.

Résumé

L'efficacite du poudre et de l'huile volatile de Piper guineense à la protection du pois contre la bruche des pois Callosobruchus maculatus a été mise ' l'épreuve au laboratoire. A des basses concentrations, le poudre a reduit d'une maniere significative l'oviposition et l'émergence de l'adulte tandis qu'il y a eu une surpression de l'oviposition a une concentration de 42%. Cette meme concentration à fourni une protection surrtsante pour la meme quantité du pois placeé dans des recipients de volumes diverses. Toutefois, le poudre na mantre aucum effect de famigant. A des concentration de 0.002% et 0.005% de l'huile volatile, on remarque une forte baisse de l'oviposition et l'emergence de l'adulte suivi d'une suppression complete de l'oviposition a 0.02% et a des concentrations superieures a une concentration de 0.02% et au dessus.

Want a la perte en poids des grains, on note qu'a 90 jours suivant le traitement a l'huile volatile il y a une diminution de celle-ci quand la concentration de l'huile augmente. La mise en pratique des resultatss pour la conservation, à petite echelle, de pois est discuteé.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addae-Mensah, I., Torto, F. G., Torto, B. and Achenbach, H., (1981) A naturally occurring trans-2-cis-4-isomer of wisanine from Piper guineense. Planta Med. 41, 200202.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1986) The preservation of beans (cowpeas) with neem oil. Tech. Leafl. Plant Prot. No. 3. Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH.Google Scholar
British Pharmacopoiea (1980) British Pharmacopoiea Method I, Vol. II, P. A108. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
El Sayed, F. and Kamel, A. H. (1981) The effect of carbon bisulphide fumigation on the different stages of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.). Agric. Res. Rev. 56, 171174.Google Scholar
Ivbijaro, , Matt, F. and Agbaje, M. (1986) Insecticidal activities of Piper guineense Schum and Thonn and Capsicum species on the cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus F. Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 521524.Google Scholar
Okogun, J. I., Sondengam, B. L. and Kimbu, S. F. (1977) New amides from the extracts of Piper guineense. Phytochem. 16, 1295.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J. V. De., Vasconcelos, H. L. De and Wanderley, M. De. B. (1977) Acao do lindane na forma de fumentas wisando o controle do Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabr., 1775) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Fitosanidade 2, 3740.Google Scholar
Regupathy, A. (1973) Antifeeding effects of fentin compounds against Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Bruchidae: Coleoptera). Madras Agric. J. 60, 586.Google Scholar
Schmutterer, H. and Ascher, K. R. S. (1984) Natural pesticides from the neem tree and other tropical plants. Proc. Int. Neem Conf., Rauschhohhausen, 1983 GTZ. Eschborn. 587 pp.Google Scholar
Schulz, F. A. (1986) Protection of stored products through the use of plant constituents. Proc. 3rd Int. Neem Conf. Nairobi, Kenya. GTZ, Eschborn (In press).Google Scholar
Singh, S. R., Luse, R. A., Leuschner, K. and Nangju, D. (1978) Control Groundnut oil treatment for the control of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) during cowpea storage. J. Stored Prod. Res. 14, 7780.Google Scholar
Sondengam, B. L., Kimbu, S. F., Njimi, T., Okogun, J. I. and Ekong, D. E. U. (1977) The structure of okolasin, A new alkaloid from Piper guineense. Tetrahedron Lett. 4, 367368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowunmi, O. E. and Akinnusi, O. A. (1983) Studies on the use of neem kernel in the control of stored cowpea beetle Callosobruchus maculatus F. Trop. Grain Legume Bull. 27, 2831.Google Scholar
Su Helen, C. F. and Sondengam, B. L. (1980) Laboratory evaluation of toxicity of two alkaloid amides of Piper guineense to four species of stored-product insects. J. Ga. Ent. Soc. 15, 4752.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1975) Effects of orange and grape fruit peels on Callosobruchus maculatus infestation of cowpea. Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 8, 169172.Google Scholar
Woode, K. A., Phillips, F. L., Addae-Mensha, I., Bart, J. C. J. and Chaudhuri, S. (1984) X-ray crystal structure of naturally occurring trans-2-cis-4-isomer of wisanine, a piperine-type alkaloid from Piper guineense. J. Nat. Prod. 47, 10241027.Google Scholar
Youdeowei, A. (1977) Insects and Nigerians: The struggle for existence. Inaugural Lecture, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, 1977.Google Scholar