1.Powell, AC, Landman, AB, Bates, DW. In search of a few good apps. JAMA. 2014;311:1851-1852.
3.Laranjo, L, Lau, A, Oldenburg, B, et al. mHealth technologies for chronic disease prevention and managemnet. An evidence check review brokered by the Sax Institute for Healthdirect Australia Sax Institute. Ultimo, NSW: Sax Institute for Helathdidrect Australila; 2015.
5.Paris, V, Devaus, M, Wei, L. Health systems institutional characteristics: A survey of 29 OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers No 50. OECD Publishing 2010.
9.Donker, T, Petrie, K, Proudfoot, J, Clarke, J, Birch, MR, Christensen, H. Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e247.
10.Busse, R, Orvain, J, Velasco, M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments - Working group 4 report. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:361-422.
11.Merlin, T, Tamblyn, D, Ellery, B, Group, IQA. What's in a name? Developing definitions for common health technology assessment product types of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (inahta). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:430-437.
12.Robustillo Cortés, Me, Cantudo Cuenca, MR, Morillo Verdugo, R, Calvo Cidoncha, E. High quantity but limited quality in healthcare applications intended for HIV-infected patients. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20:729-735.
13.Stoyanov, SR, Hides, L, Kavanagh, DJ, et al. Mobile app rating scale: A new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e27.
14.Powell, AC, Torous, J, Chan, S, et al. Interrater Reliability of mHealth app rating measures: Analysis of top depression and smoking cessation apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e15.
15.Beatty, AL, Fukuoka, Y, Whooley, MA. Using mobile technology for cardiac rehabilitation: A review and framework for development and evaluation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000568.
16.Drincic, A, Prahalad, P, Greenwood, D, Klonoff, DC. Evidence-based mobile medical applications in diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2016;45:943-965.
17.Portelli, P, Eldred, C. A quality review of smartphone applications for the management of pain. Br J Pain. 2016;10:135-140.
18.Chan, S, Torous, J, Hinton, L, Yellowlees, P. Towards a framework for evaluating mobile mental health apps. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21:1038-1041.
19.McMillan, B, Hickey, E, Patel, MG, Mitchell, C. Quality assessment of a sample of mobile app-based health behavior change interventions using a tool based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence behavior change guidance. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:429-435.
20.Albrecht, UV, Von Jan, U, Pramann, O. Standard reporting for medical apps. In: Mantas, J, Hasman, A, editors. Informatics, management and technology in healthcare. 190: IOC Press; 2013:201-203.
21.Kassianos, AP, Emery, JD, Murchie, P, Walter, FM. Smartphone applications for melanoma detection by community, patient and generalist clinician users: A review. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:1507-1518.
22.Pandey, A, Hasan, S, Dubey, D, Sarangi, S. Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: Changing trends in health information-seeking behavior. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28:138-142.
23.Yasini, M, Marchand, G. Mobile health applications, in the absence of an authentic regulation, does the usability score correlate with a better medical reliability? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:127-131.
24.Murfin, M. Know your apps: An evidence-based approach to evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24:38-40.
25.Gibbs, J, Gkatzidou, V, Tickle, L, et al. 'Can you recommend any good STI apps?' A review of content, accuracy and comprehensiveness of current mobile medical applications for STIs and related genital infections. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93:234-235.
26.Grundy, QH, Wang, Z, Bero, LA. Challenges in assessing mobile health app quality: A systematic review of prevalent and innovative methods. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51:1051-1059.
27.Huckvale, K, Morrison, C, Ouyang, J, Ghaghda, A, Car, J. The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: An updated systematic assessment of content and tools. BMC Med. 2015;13:58.
28.Martínez-Pérez, B, De La Torre-Díez, I, Candelas-Plasencia, S, López-Coronado, M. Development and evaluation of tools for measuring the quality of experience (QoE) in mHealth applications. J Med Syst. 2013;37:9976.
29.Martinez-Perez, B, de la Torre-Diez, I, Lopez-Coronado, M. Experiences and results of applying tools for assessing the quality of a mHealth app named Heartkeeper. J Med Syst. 2015;39:142.
30.Gautham, M, Iyengar, MS, Johnson, CW. Mobile phone-based clinical guidance for rural health providers in India. Health Informatics J. 2015;21:253-266.
31.mHIMSS App Usability Work Group. Selecting a mobile app: Evaluating the usability of medical applications. Chicago, IL: Healthcare Infomation and Management Systems Society; 2012.
32.Aungst, TD, Clauson, KA, Misra, S, Lewis, TL, Husain, I. How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:155-162.
33.Fairburn, CG, Rothwell, ER. Apps and eating disorders: A systematic clinical appraisal. Int J Eat Disord. 2015;48:1038-1046.
35.Merlin, T, Lehman, S, Hiller, JE, Ryan, P. The “linked evidence approach” to assess medical tests: A critical analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:343-350.
36.Ferrero-Alvarez-Rementeria, J, Santana-Lopez, V, Escobar-Ubreva, A, Vazquez-Vazquez, M. Quality and safety strategy for mobile health applications: A certification programme. Eur J ePractice. 2013;21:14-26.
37.Singh, K, Drouin, K, Newmark, LP, et al. Developing a framework for evaluating the patient engagement, quality, and safety of mobile health applications. Issue brief (Commonw Fund). 2016;5:1-11.
39.Brooks, GC, Vittinghoff, E, Iyer, S, et al. Accuracy and usability of a self-administered 6-minute walk test smartphone application. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:905-913.
40.Walsworth, DT. Medical apps: Making your mobile device a medical device. Fam Pract Manag. 2012;19:10-13.
41.Basilico, A, Marceglia, S, Bonacina, S, Pinciroli, F. Advising patients on selecting trustful apps for diabetes self-care. Comput Biol Med. 2016;71:86-96.
42.Lee, H, Sullivan, SJ, Schneiders, AG, et al. Smartphone and tablet apps for concussion road warriors (team clinicians): A systematic review for practical users. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:499-505.
43.Reynoldson, C, Stones, C, Allsop, M, et al. Assessing the quality and usability of smartphone apps for pain self-management. Pain Med. 2014;15:898-909.
44.Schnall, R, Mosley, JP, Iribarren, SJ, et al. Comparison of a user-centered design, self-management app to existing mHealth apps for persons living with HIV. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e91.
45.Shaia, KL, Farag, S, Chyjek, K, Knopman, J, Chen, KT. An evaluation of mobile applications for reproductive endocrinology and infertility providers. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23:254-258.
46.Shen, N, Levitan, MJ, Johnson, A, et al. Finding a depression app: A review and content analysis of the depression app marketplace. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3:e16.
47.Lalloo, C, Jibb, LA, Rivera, J, Agarwal, A, Stinson, JN. “There's a pain app for that”: Review of patient-targeted smartphone applications for pain management. Clin J Pain. 2015;31:557-563.
48.International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Draft: Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical evaluation. International Medical Device Regulators Forum; 2016.
49.Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Guidelines for the assessment of diagnostic technologies. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia 2005.
50.Medical Services Advisory Committee. Technical guidelines for preparingassessment reports for the Medical Services Advisory Committee – Medical Service Type: Therapeutic. Australian Government; 2016.
51.Medical Services Advisory Committee. Technical guidelines for preparing assessment reports for the Medical Services Advisory Committee – Service Type: Investigative. Australian Government; 2016.
53.U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA fact sheet. The FDA's roll in medical device cybersecurity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.
54.International Medical Device Regulators Forum. “Software as a medical device”: Possible framework for risk categorization and corresponding considerations. International Medical Device Regulators Forum; 2014.
55.Forbrukerradet. Consumer protection in fitness wearables. Norway: Forbrukerradet; 2016.
56.O'Meley, PL, ed. Update on software as a medical device (SaMD). ARCS Scientific Congress 2016; Canberra: Australian Government.
57.Arnhold, M, Quade, M, Kirch, W. Mobile applications for diabetics: A systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e104.
58.BinDhim, NF, Hawkey, A, Trevena, L. A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21:97-104.
59.Chomutare, T, Fernandez-Luque, L, Arsand, E, Hartvigsen, G. Features of mobile diabetes applications: Review of the literature and analysis of current applications compared against evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e65.
60.Demidowich, AP, Lu, K, Tamler, R, Bloomgarden, Z. An evaluation of diabetes self-management applications for Android smartphones. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18:235-238.
61.Hoppe, CD, Cade, JE, Carter, M. An evaluation of diabetes targeted apps for Android smartphone in relation to behaviour change techniques. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017;30:326-338.
62.IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient apps for improved healthcare from novelty to mainstream. IMS Instutute for Healthcare Informatics; 2013.
63.Jin, M, Kim, J. Development and evaluation of an evaluation tool for healthcare smartphone applications. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21:831-837.
64.Mobasheri, MH, Johnston, M, King, D, Leff, D, Thiruchelvam, P, Darzi, A. Smartphone breast applications - What's the evidence? Breast. 2014;23:683-689.
66.Shah, N, Jonassaint, J, De Castro, L. Patients welcome the sickle cell disease mobile application to record symptoms via technology (SMART). Hemoglobin. 2014;38:99-103.