Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:36:13.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PP033 Patient And Public Involvement In Health Technology Assessment: The Brazilian Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

The National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) (1) was created in 2011, when the participation of civil society in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process was formalized in Brazil. According to legislation, patient and public involvement (PPI) in HTA occurs through: public consultations (PC); representation of SUS (Brazilian Public Health System) users in the plenary of CONITEC and by public hearings in relevant cases. Due the incipient culture of social participation in Brazil, strategies involving better communication, direct participation and popular education were developed to broaden and qualify this participation.

METHODS:

  • Case study about PPI strategies developed in 5 years of CONITEC

  • Analysis of documents and official records from the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

RESULTS:

Since its creation, the innovations of CONITEC regarding PPI were: creation of specific PC form to reproduce or represent the perspectives of patients and caregivers; summarized versions of technical reports written in a simplified language to improve users involvement; surveys prior to elaborating clinical guidelines, a bi-weekly educational program transmitted by streaming, and the recent launch of an HTA Users Guide and a mobile app.

After the implementation of these strategies (which started in 2014), there was an increase of annual contributions, from 2,584 in 2014 to 13,619 in 2015. Most participants were patients, family members or caregivers. Surveys concerning clinical guidelines received about 3,000 contributions. There were thirty-seven published society reports until December 2016. The publication of the HTA Users Guide and other related actions increased the number of accesses to the CONITEC website and its subsection for social participation. The educational program had more than 800 online accesses in five months.

CONCLUSIONS:

These actions allowed expanding and qualifying PPI beyond what is legally defined, and it is possible to predict an increasingly favorable scenario regarding the patient and public participation in HTA in Brazil.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

REFERENCES:

1. National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). Available in: www.conitec.gov.br.Google Scholar