Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Economic Evaluation of A Support Program for Caregivers of Demented Elderly

  • Michael F. Drummond (a1), E. Ann Mohide (a2), Michelle Tew (a2), David L. Streiner (a2), Dorothy M. Pringle (a3) and J. Raymond Gilbert (a2)...

Abstract

An economic evaluation was undertaken concurrently with a randomized trial comparing a Caregiver Support Program (CSP) with existing conventional community nursing care for those caring for elderly relatives at home. The differences in resource consumption were compared with changes in caregiver quality of life, as measured by the Caregiver Quality of Life Instrument (CQLI). A 20% difference from baseline in the CQLI favored the experimental (CSP) group, although this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance. A comparison of improvement in quality of life with costs implies an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of Canadian $20,000 for the CSP, which compares favorably with other health care interventions. Further, larger studies are required to confirm this result.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Anthony-Bergstone, C. R., Zarit, S. H., & Gatz, M.Symptoms of psychological distress among caregivers of dementia patients. Psychology and Aging, 1988, 3, 245–48.
2.Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M.The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1968, 114, 797811.
3.Caserta, M. S., Lund, D. A., Wright, S. D., et al. Caregivers to dementia patients: The utilization of community services. The Gerontologist, 1987, 27, 209–14.
4.Cohen, J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic, 1969.
5.Drummond, M. F., & Stoddart, G. L.Economic analysis and clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1984, 5, 115–28.
6.Drummond, M. F., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W.Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
7.Eagles, J. M., Beattie, J. A. G., Blackwood, G. W., et al. The mental health of elderly couples. I. The effects of a cognitively impaired spouse. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987, 150, 299303.
8.Fitting, M., Rabins, P., Lucas, M. J., et al. Caregivers for dementia patients: A comparison of husbands and wives. The Gerontologist, 1986, 26, 248–52.
9.Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R.Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975, 12, 189–98.
10.Greene, J. G., Smith, R., Gardiner, M., et al. Measuring behavioral disturbance of elderly demented patients in the community and its effect on relatives: A factor analytic study. Age and Aging, 1982, 11, 121–26.
11.Haley, W. E., Levine, E. G., Brown, S. L., et al. Psychological, social, and health consequences of caring for a relative with senile dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1987, 35, 405–11.
12.Kyle, D. R., Drummond, M. F., & White, D. M. D.The Hereford District Department of Mental Health of the Elderly: A preliminary evaluation. Community Medicine, 1987, 9, 3546.
13.Mohide, E. A., Pringle, D. M., Streiner, D. L., Gilbert, J. R., et al. A randomized trial of family caregiver support in the home management of dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1990, 38, 446–54.
14.Mohide, E. A., Torrance, G. W., Streiner, D. L., et al. Measuring the wellbeing of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988, 41, 475–82.
15.Mooney, G. H., Russell, E. M., & Weir, R. D. Marginal analysis: A case study in care of the elderly. In Choices in Health Care, London: Macmillan, 1980, 77.
16.Rabins, P., Mace, N., & Lucas, M.The impact of dementia on the family. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1982, 248, 333–35.
17.Radloff, L. S.The CES-D Scale: A new self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977, 1, 385401.
18.Reisberg, B., Ferris, S., DeLeon, M., et al. The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1982, 139, 1136–39.
19.Robertson, D., Rockwood, K., & Stolee, P.A short mental status questionnaire. Canadian Journal on Aging, 1982, 1, 1620.
20.Robinson, B. C.Validation of a caregiver strain index. Journal of Gerontology, 1983, 38, 344–48.
21.Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988.
22.Spielberger, G., Gorsuch, R., & Lushene, R.STAI manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. California: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1968.
23.Torrance, G. W., Thomas, W. H., & Sackett, D. L.A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Service Research, 1972, 7, 118–33.
24.Torrance, G. W., & Zipursky, A.Cost-effectiveness of antepartum prevention of Rh immunization. Clinics in Perinatology, 1984, 11, 267–81.
25.Warner, K. E., & Luce, B. R.Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1982.
26.Weissert, W. G.Seven reasons why it is so difficult to make community-based long-term care cost-effective. Health Services Research, 1985, 20, 423–33.
27.Weissert, W. G., Wan, T. T. H., Livieratos, B. B., et al. Cost-effectiveness of homemaker services for the chronically ill. Inquiry, 1980, 17, 230–43.
29.Wright, K. G., Cairns, J. A., & Snell, M. C. Costing Care. Social Services Monographs, Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield Joint Unit for Social Services Research, 1981.
28.Williams, A. H.Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting. British Medical Journal, 1985, 291, 326–29.
30.Zarit, S., Reever, K. E., & Bach-Peterson, J.Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist, 1980, 20, 649–55.

Economic Evaluation of A Support Program for Caregivers of Demented Elderly

  • Michael F. Drummond (a1), E. Ann Mohide (a2), Michelle Tew (a2), David L. Streiner (a2), Dorothy M. Pringle (a3) and J. Raymond Gilbert (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed