1.Clark, E., and Marshall, D. A description of the organization and function of national health technology assessment agencies. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting, International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Sorrento, Italy, 1993, 146.
2.Donaldson, M. S., and Cox, H. C. Jr.Setting priorities for health technology assessment: A model process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
3.Fuchs, V. R. and Garber, A. M.The new technology assessment. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 673–77.
4.Government of Alberta. An agenda for action: Report of the advisory committee on the utilization of medical services. Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta, 1989.
5.Government of Alberta. Partners in health (The Government of Alberta's response to the premier's commission on future health care for Albertans). Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta.
6.Herdman, R. C. and Behney, C. J.Health and life sciences at the Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, 1, 160–68.
7.Lomas, J.Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for child birth. Milbank Quarterly, 1993, 71, 439–76.
8.Menon, D.Health technology assessment in Canada. Dimensions in Health Service, 1990, 67, 31.
9.Menon, D. Technology assessment. In Ziebarth, S. A. (ed.), Feeling the squeeze. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Hospital Association, 1991, 361–67.
10.Premier's Commission on Future Health Care for Albertans. The rainbow report: Our vision for health. Edmonton, Canada: Government of Alberta, 1989.