Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Cost-effectiveness analysis of medical documentation alternatives

  • Renata Kopach (a1), Somayeh Sadat (a1), Ian D. Gallaway (a1), Glen Geiger (a2), Wendy J. Ungar (a3) and Peter C. Coyte (a1)...

Abstract

Objectives: The delay between patient discharge and the completion of the final discharge note have prompted hospitals to consider new information technologies. This study compared the relative cost-effectiveness of an automated medical documentation system to the current system in place at a Canadian hospital. There are significant expenditures associated with the choice of medical documentation system, yet the benefit to the patient population has not been studied.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Cost data for the current documentation system were obtained from the study hospital. The costs of purchasing the automated system were obtained from the manufacturer. Other resource cost implications of the automated system were estimated based on information obtained from the Centre for Applied Health Informatics at the study hospital. The outcome was determined to be the average time (days) between patient discharge and note completion. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine the robustness of the results.

Results: The automated documentation system was associated with higher costs but better outcomes than the current system. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio used for comparing the automated medical documentation system with the traditional system indicated that the incremental daily cost for decreasing a day in average note completion time per discharge note was 0.331 Canadian $/day over the study period (4 years).

Conclusions: Although the automated documentation system was more expensive than the current system, it also provided qualitative benefits that were not considered in the cost-effectiveness analysis.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ball MJ. 1995. Healthcare information management systems: A practical guide. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag;
Chan SY, Ohlmann J, Dunbar S, et al. 2002 Operations research methods applied to workflow in a medical records department. Health Care Manag Sci. 5: 191199.
Drummond MF. 1997. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press;
Essex D. 1999 Taking dictation into the 21st century. Healthc Inform. 16: 6165.
Henricks WH, Roumina K, Skilton BE, Ozan DJ, Goss GR. 2002 The utility and cost effectiveness of voice recognition technology in surgical pathology. Mod Pathol. 15: 565571.
Leland T, Blank AJ. 1989. Engineering economics. New York: McGraw-Hill;
van Walraven C, Laupacis A, Seth R, Wells G. 1999 Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: A randomized clinical trial. Canad Med Assoc J. 160: 319326.
Zafar A, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. 1999 Continuous speech recognition for clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 6: 195204.

Keywords

Cost-effectiveness analysis of medical documentation alternatives

  • Renata Kopach (a1), Somayeh Sadat (a1), Ian D. Gallaway (a1), Glen Geiger (a2), Wendy J. Ungar (a3) and Peter C. Coyte (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed