Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

COMPARISON OF RECENTLY USED PHACOEMULSIFICATION SYSTEMS USING A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHOD

  • Jiannan Huang (a1), Qi Wang (a2), Caimin Zhao (a3), Xiaohua Ying (a4) and Haidong Zou (a5)...

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the recently used phacoemulsification systems using a health technology assessment (HTA) model.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire, which included questions to gauge on the opinions of the recently used phacoemulsification systems, was distributed to the chief cataract surgeons in the departments of ophthalmology of eighteen tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. A series of senile cataract patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery were enrolled in the study. The surgical results and the average costs related to their surgeries were all recorded and compared for the recently used phacoemulsification systems.

Results: The four phacoemulsification systems currently used in Shanghai are the Infiniti Vision, Centurion Vision, WhiteStar Signature, and Stellaris Vision Enhancement systems. All of the doctors confirmed that the systems they used would help cataract patients recover vision. A total of 150 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were enrolled in the present study. A significant difference was found among the four groups in cumulative dissipated energy, with the lowest value found in the Centurion group. No serious complications were observed and a positive trend in visual acuity was found in all four groups after cataract surgery. The highest total cost of surgery was associated with procedures conducted using the Centurion Vision system, and significant differences between systems were mainly because of the cost of the consumables used in the different surgeries.

Conclusions: This HTA comparison of four recently used phacoemulsification systems found that each of system offers a satisfactory vision recovery outcome, but differs in surgical efficacy and costs.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Lundstrom, M, Barry, P, Henry, Y, Rosen, P, Stenevi, U. Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: Guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:10861093.
2. The City Medical Insurance system in Shanghai. Shanghai Government 2015. http://www.shyb.gov.cn/ybdt/201510/t20151026_1239461.shtml (accessed August 8, 2016).
3. Sigmund, H, Kristensen, FB. Health technology assessment in Denmark: Strategy, implementation, and developments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 1):94101.
4. Garrido, MV, Kristensen, FB, Nielsen, CP. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe; Current status, challenge and potential. Geneva: WHO Regional Office Europe. 2008.
5. Gagnon, MP. Hospital-based health technology assessment: Development to date. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:819824.
6. McGregor, M, Brophy, JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:263267.
7. Ehlers, L, Vestergaard, M, Kidholm, K, et al. Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:295301.
8. Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment (DACEHTA). Introduction to mini-HTA -a management and decision support tool for the hospital service. Copenhagen: National Board of Health; 2005.
9. Christakis, PG, Braga-Mele, RM. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcome comparison of longitudinal, torsional, and transversal phacoemulsification machines. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:234241.
10. Solomon, KD, Lorente, R, Fanney, D, Cionni, RJ. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:542549.
11. Chylack, LT Jr, Leske, MC, McCarthy, D, Khu, P, Kashiwagi, T, Sperduto, R. Lens Opacities Classification System II(LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:991997.
12. Kidholm, K, Ehlers, L, Korsbek, L, Kjaerby, R, Beck, M. Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:4248.
13. Grosso, A, Charrier, L, Lovato, E, et al. Twenty-five-gauge vitrectomy versus 23-gauge vitrectomy in the management of macular diseases: A comparative analysis through a health technology assessment mode. Int Ophthalmol. 2014;34:217223.
14. Chalkidou, K, Levine, R, Dillon, A. Helping poorer countries make locally informed health decisions. BMJ. 2010;341:c3651.
15. Sampietro-Colom, L, Morilla-Bachs, M, Gutierrez-Moreno, S, Gallo, P. Development and test of a decision support tool for hospital health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:460465.

Keywords

COMPARISON OF RECENTLY USED PHACOEMULSIFICATION SYSTEMS USING A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHOD

  • Jiannan Huang (a1), Qi Wang (a2), Caimin Zhao (a3), Xiaohua Ying (a4) and Haidong Zou (a5)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed