Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T18:06:18.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Screening for Cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Carlo La Vecchia ,
Fabio Levi ,
Silvia Franceschi  and
Peter Boyle
Carlo La Vecchia
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Preventive and Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”
Fabio Levi
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Preventive and Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”
Silvia Franceschi
Affiliation:
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico
Peter Boyle
Affiliation:
International Agency for Research on Cancer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Screening has a relevant role in and is likely to become an increasingly important instrument for cancer control in the near future. This overview summarizes some of the available evidence on the issue. Some of the opinions are well established. The apparent absence of consensus on other issues should be critically evaluated, too, because the evidence on some procedures is substantially more convincing than that on others. High costs, low compliance, poor curability, and substantial false positive rates, in a disease as relatively rare as cancer, often counterbalance in practice the theoretical benefits of diagnostic anticipation. In screening as well as in treatment for cancer, it is unlikely that major technical breakthroughs will occur in the near future. The evaluation of whether the benefits likely to be achieved by the screening program outweigh its disadvantages by a sufficient margin, therefore, should rely on large and carefully planned controlled studies.

Type
Special Section: Assessment Of Preventive Technologies
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1991 , pp. 275 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bodmer, W. F., Bailey, C. J., Bodmer, J., et al. Localization of the gene for familial adenomatous polyposis on chromosome 5. Nature, 1987, 328, 614-16.Google Scholar
2.Chamberlain, J.Failures of the cervical cytology screening programme. British Medical Journal, 1984, 289, 853–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Chu, K. C., Smart, C., & Tarone, R. E.Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan Clinical Trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988, 80, 1125-32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Clayman, C. B.Mass screening for colorectal cancer: Are we ready? Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 261, 609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Collette, H. J. A., Day, N. E., Rombach, J. J., & de Waard, F.Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a nonrandomized study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet, 1984, i, 1224–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dales, L. G., Friedman, G. D., & Collen, M. F.Evaluating periodic multiphasic health checkups: A controlled trial. Journal of Chronic Disease, 1979, 32, 385–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Day, N. E., Baines, C. J., Chamberlain, J., et al. UICC project on screening for cancer: Report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 1986, 38, 303–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Ebeling, K., & Nischan, P.Screening for lung cancer – Results from a case-control study. International Journal of Cancer, 1987, 40, 141–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Editorial. Cancer of the cervix: Death by incompetence. Lancet, 1985, ii, 363–64.Google Scholar
10.Editorial. Screening for breast cancer. Lancet, 1987, i, 575–76.Google Scholar
11.Editorial. Oral cancer. Lancet, 1989, ii, 311–12.Google Scholar
12.Elwood, J. M., Cotton, R. E., Johnson, J., et al. Are patients with abnormal cervical smears adequately managed? British Medical Journal, 1984, 289, 891–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Flehinger, B. J., Melamed, M. R., Zaman, M. B., et al. Screening for early detection of lung cancer in New York. In Prorock, P. C. & Miller, A. B. (eds.), Screening for cancer. UICC Technical Reports Series, vol. 78. Geneva: UICC, 1984, 123–35.Google Scholar
14.Fleischer, D. E., Goldberg, S. B., Browning, T. H., et al. Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 261, 580–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Fontana, R. S.Screening for lung cancer. In Miller, A. B. (ed.), Screening for cancer. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1985, 377–95.Google Scholar
16.Gilbertsen, V. A.Colon cancer screening: The Minnesota experience. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1980, 26, 31s–32s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Greenwald, P., & Sondick, E. J. (eds.). Cancer control objectives for the Nation: 1985–2000. National Cancer Institute Monograph, No. 2, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986.Google Scholar
18.Hakama, M., Chamberlain, J., Day, N. E., et al. Evaluation of screening programmes for gynaecological cancers. British Journal of Cancer, 1985, 52, 669–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Hardcastle, J. D., Armitage, N. C., Chamberlain, J., et al. Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. Results of a controlled trial. Cancer, 1986, 58, 397–403.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Hirayama, T.Screening for gastric cancer. In Miller, A. B. (ed.), Screening for cancer. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1985, 3567–76.Google Scholar
21.Hill, D., White, V., Jolley, D., & Mapperson, K.Self examination of the breast: Is it beneficial? Meta-analysis of studies investigating breast self examination and extent of disease in patients with breast cancer. British Medical Journal, 1988, 297, 271–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Hricak, H., & Demas, B. E.Advances in imaging. Cancer, 1988, 62(suppl.), 1865–70.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Huguley, C. M., Brown, R. L., Greenberg, R. S., & Clark, W. S.Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer. Cancer, 1988, 62, 1389–963.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.IARC Working Group on Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: Duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. British Medical Journal, 1986,293,659–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Jacobs, J., Stabile, I., Bridges, J., et al. Multimodal approach to screening for ovarian cancer. Lancet, 1988, i, 268–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Kewenter, J., Haglind, E., & Suanvik, J.Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: The Swedish experience. In Faivre, J. & Hill, M. J. (eds.), Causation and prevention of colorectal cancer. Proceedings of the Workshop of the European Organisation for Cooperation in Cancer Prevention Studies (ECP). Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1987, 1979–85.Google Scholar
27.Knight, K. K., Fielding, J. F., & Battista, R.Occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989, 261, 587–94.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Kronborg, O., Fenger, C., Sondergaard, O., et al. Initial mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1987, 22, 677-86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Lààrà, E., Day, N. E., & Hakama, M.Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: Association with organized screening programmes. Lancet, 1987, i, 1247–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.La Vecchia, C., Decarli, A., & Gallus, G.Epidemiological data on cervical carcinoma relevant to cytopathology. Applied Pathology, 1987, 5, 25–32.Google ScholarPubMed
31.Levi, F., La Vecchia, C., Te, V. C., & Gutzwiller, F.Incidence of invasive cervical cancer in the Swiss canton of Vaud, and a note on screening. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1989, 43, 121–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Miller, A. B. (ed.). Screening for cancer. UICC Technical Report 78. Geneva: UICC, 1984.Google Scholar
33.Miller, A. B.Screening for cancer: Issues and future directions. Journal of Chronic Disease, 1986, 39, 1067–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Miller, A. B.Screening for cancer: State of the art and prospects for the future. World Journal of Surgery, 1989, 13, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Morrison, A. S., Brisson, J., & Khalid, N.Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1988, 80, 1540–47.Google Scholar
36.Muir, C., Waterhouse, J., Mack, T., et al. (eds.). Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. 5. IARC Scientific Publication 88. Lyon: IARC, 1987.Google Scholar
37.Oosterom, R., Bogdanowicz, J., & Schroeder, F. H.Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen in untreated prostatic carcinoma. European Urology, 1989, 16, 253–57.Google Scholar
38.Palli, G., Rosselli Del Turco, M., et al. A case-control study of the efficacy of a nonrandomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy). International Journal of Cancer, 1986, 38, 501–04.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Parkin, D. M., & Moss, S. M.An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1986, 40, 143–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Peto, R. Why cancer? The causes of cancer in developed countries. Times Health Supplement, 11 6, 1981.Google Scholar
41.Pritchard, K. I.Screening for endometrial cancer: Is it effective? Annals of Internal Medicine, 1989, 110, 177–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Prorok, P. C., Chamberlain, J., Day, N. E., et al. UICC workshop on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 1984, 34, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Rifkin, M. D.Endorectal sonography of the prostate: Principal implications. American Journal of Roentgenology (Baltimore), 1987, 148, 1137-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Shapiro, S., Venet, W., Strax, P., et al. Ten- to fourteen-years of screening on breast mortality. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1982, 69, 349-55.Google Scholar
45.Solomon, E., Voss, R., Hall, V., et al. Chromosome 5 allele loss in human colorectal carcinomas. Nature, 1987, 328, 616-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Staney, T. A., Kabalin, J. B., Ferrari, M., & Yang, N.Prostate specific antigen in the diag nosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate: II. Radical prostatectomy treated patients. Journal of Urology, 1989, 141, 1076-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Stenkvist, B., Bergström, R., Eklund, G., & Fox, C. H.Papanicolau smear screening and cervical cancer. What can you expect? Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984, 252, 1423-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Tabàr, L., Faberberg, G., Day, N. E., & Holmberg, L.What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations?—An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-country breast cancer screening trial. British Journal of Cancer, 1987, 55, 547-51.Google Scholar
49.Winawer, S. J., Andrews, M., Flehinger, B., et al. Progress report on controlled trial of faecal occult blood testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer, 1980, 45, 2959-64.Google Scholar
50.Zaridze, D. G., Boyle, P., & Smans, M.Time trends in prostatic cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 1985, 33, 213-30.Google Scholar