Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-rn2sj Total loading time: 0.93 Render date: 2022-08-19T10:30:19.244Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Patient Decision Making: The Missing Ingredient in Compliance Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Jenny L. Donovan
University of Bristol


Medical noncompliance has been identified as a major public health problem that imposes a considerable financial burden upon modern health care systems. There is a large research record focusing on the understanding, measurement, and resolution of noncompliance, but it is consistently found that between one third and one half of patients fail to comply with medical advice and prescriptions. Critically absent from this research record has been the patient's role in medical decision making. For patients, particularly those with chronic illnesses, compliance is not an issue: they make their own reasoned decisions about treatments based on their own beliefs, personal circumstances, and the information available to them. The traditional concept of compliance is thus outmoded in modern health care systems, where chronic illness and questioning patients predominate.

Special Section: The Rational Use of Therapeutic Drugs
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1.Annals of Pharmacotherapy (editorial). Patient compliance. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 1993, 27, S524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Audit Commission. A prescription for improvement. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
3.Barr, D. A.Competent patients and irrational choices (letter). New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 1353–54.Google Scholar
4.Bartlett, E. E., Grayson, M., Barker, R., Levine, D. M., Golden, A., & Libber, S.The effects of physician communication skills on patient satisfaction, recall and adherence. Journal of Chronic Disease, 1984, 37, 755–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Bond, W. S., & Hussar, D. A.Detection methods and strategies for improving medication compliance. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1991, 48, 1978–87.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Brock, D. W., & Wartmen, S. A.When competent patients make irrational choices. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 322, 1595–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Buchholz, W. M.When competent patients make irrational choices (letter). New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 1354.Google Scholar
8.Cornwell, J.Hard earned lives. London: Tavistock, 1984.Google Scholar
9.DiMatteo, M. R.Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. Journal of the American Association of Medicine, 1994, 271, 7983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Donovan, J. L.Patient education and the consultation: The importance of lay beliefs. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1991, 50, 418–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Donovan, J. L., & Blake, D. R.Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision-making? Social Science and Medicine, 1992, 34, 507–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Donovan, J. L., Blake, D. R., & Fleming, W. G.The patient is not a blank sheet: Lay beliefs and their relevance to patient education. British Journal of Rheumatology, 1989, 28, 5861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Franicis, V., Korsch, B., & Morris, M.Gaps in doctor-patient communication. New England Journal of Medicine, 1969, 280, 535–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Friedson, E.Professional dominance. New York: Dodd Mead and Co., 1970.Google Scholar
15.Garattini, S., & Garattini, L.Pharmaceutical prescriptions in four European countries. Lancet, 1993, 342, 1191–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Gerbino, P. P.Foreword. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 1993, 27, S34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Hamilton, R. A., & Briceland, L. L.Use of prescription-refill records to assess patient compliance. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 1992, 49, 1691–96.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Henbest, R. J., & Stewart, M.Patient centredness in the consultation: Does it really make a difference? Family Practice, 1990, 7, 2833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Heszen-Klemens, I., & Lapinska, E.Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behaviour and effects of treatment. Social Science and Medicine, 1984, 19, 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Hulka, B. S., Cassel, J. H., Kupper, L. L., & Burdette, J. A.Communication, compliance and concordance between physicians and patients with prescribed medications. American Journal of Public Health, 1976, 66, 847–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Kessler, D. A.Communicating with patients about their medications. New England Journal of Medicine, 1991, 325, 1650–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Korsch, B. M., Freeman, B., & Negrete, V. F.Practical implications of the doctor-patient interaction analysis for pediatric practice. American Journal of Diseases of Childhood, 1971, 121, 110–14.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Kruse, W.Patient compliance with drug treatment: New perspectives on an old problem. Clinical Investigator, 1992, 70, 163–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Ley, P., & Spelman, M. S.Communicating with the patient. London: Staples Press, 1967.Google Scholar
25.Locker, D.Symptoms and illness. London: Tavistock, 1981.Google Scholar
26.Malenka, D. J., Baron, J. A., Johansen, S., Wahrenberger, J. W., & Ross, J. M.The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1993, 8, 543–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Morrison, R.Medication non-compliance. Canadian Nurse, 1993, 98, 1518.Google Scholar
28.Olivieri, N. F., Matsui, D., Hermann, C., & Koren, G.Compliance assessed by the Medication Event Monitoring System. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991, 66, 13991402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Proos, M., Reiley, P., Eagan, J., Stengrevics, S., Castile, J., & Arian, D. A study of the effects of self-medication on patients' knowledge of and compliance with their medication regimen. Journal of Nursing Care Quarterly, 1992, 1826.Google Scholar
30.Redelmeier, D. H.Understanding patients’ decision. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1993, 270, 7276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Rees, A. M.Communication in the patient-physician relationship. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1993, 81, 110.Google Scholar
32.Rivers, P. H.Compliance aids: Do they work? Drugs and Aging, 1992, 2, 103–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A.Strategies for enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1994, 271, 8081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Rudd, P., Ahmed, S., Zachary, V., Barton, C., & Bonduelle, D.Issues in patient compliance: The search for therapeutic sufficiency. Cardiology, 1992, 80(Suppl.) 210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Schlar, D. A.Improving medication compliance: A review of selected issues. Clinical Therapeutics, 1991, 13, 436–40.Google Scholar
36.Starfield, B., Wray, C., Hess, K., Gross, R., Birk, P., & D'Lugoff, B.The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. American Journal of Public Health, 1981, 71, 127–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Steiner, J. F., Fihn, S. D., Blair, B., & Inui, T.S.Appropriate reductions in compliance among well-controlled hypertensive patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991, 44, 1361–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Stockwell Morris, L., & Schulz, R. M.Patient compliance: An overview. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 1992, 17, 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Stockwell Morris, L., & Schulz, R. M.Medication compliance: The patient's perspective. Clinical Therapeutics, 1993, 15, 593606.Google Scholar
40.Svarstad, B. The doctor-patient encounter: An observational study of communication and outcome. Unpublished dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1974.Google Scholar
41.Tetersell, M. J.Asthma patients' knowledge in relation to compliance with drug therapy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1993, 18, 103–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Trostle, J. A.Medical compliance as an ideology. Social Science and Medicine, 1988, 20, 1299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Tuckett, D. A., Boulton, M., Olson, C., & Williams, A.Meetings between experts: An approach to sharing ideas in medical consultations. London: Tavistock, 1986.Google Scholar
44.Waitzkin, H.A critical theory of medical discourse. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 1989, 30, 220–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Wennberg, J. E.Outcomes research, patient preference, and the primary care physician. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 1991, 4, 365–67.Google ScholarPubMed
46.Wright, E. C.Non-compliance: Or how many aunts has Matilda? Lancet, 1993, 342, 909–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Patient Decision Making: The Missing Ingredient in Compliance Research
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Patient Decision Making: The Missing Ingredient in Compliance Research
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Patient Decision Making: The Missing Ingredient in Compliance Research
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *