Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:34:54.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Significance of the Sunni Schools of Law in Islamic Religious History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

George Makdisi
George Makdisi
Affiliation:
University Of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the more interesting phenomena in Islamic religious history is the development of the schools of law. This phenomenon has seldom failed to arouse ourinterest, though it has consistently eluded our understanding. The difficulty in grasping the significance of the schools of law is evidenced by vacillation in translating the termmadhhab. This term was first translated as ‘sect,’ then as ‘rite’ or ‘school.’ But a Sunni madhhab could not be a sect, since the term ‘sect’ is applied to a dissenting religious body, one that is heretical in the eyes of other members within the same communion. That is not the case with the Sunni madhhabs, all of which are regarded equally as orthodox. Nor is the term ‘rite’ an adequate one, since it applies to a division of the Christian church as determined by liturgy; and, unlike a transfer from one rite to another in Christianity, a transfer requiring certain formalities, the transfer in Islam is made from one madhhab to another without any formalities whatsoever. The term ‘school,’ for lack of a better term, is the most acceptable; it is the one that offers the least difficulty.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Author's Note: This paper was the presidential address delivered at theAnnual Meeting of the Middle East Studies Association in New York on 10 November 1977.

1 Schacht, J., Esquisse d'unehistoire du droit musulman (Paris: Max Besson,1953), p. 24;Google Scholaridem., An Introduction to Islamic Law(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), p.28.Google Scholar

2 Schacht, J., The Origins ofMuhammadan Jurisprudence (Oxford: The ClarendonPress, 1950), p. 7.Google Scholar For the Arabic text, seeShāfi'i, , Kitāb al-Umm, 7 vols.(Cairo: Būlāq Press,1321–1325/1903–1907), VII, 246.Google Scholar

3 On the concept of riyāsa, see the study by G.Makdisi in the forthcoming Mélanges in honor of G. C. Anawati andLouis Gardet (Louvain).

4 Mez, A., The Renaissance ofIslam (London: Luzac, 1937), p.212.Google Scholar

5 Ibn, Qutaiba, Kitābal-ma'ārif, ed. Wüstenfeld, F.(Gottingen, 1850), pp. 248 f.,Google Scholar cited inGoldziher, I., Die Zâhirten, ihr Lehrsystem undihre Geschichte (Leipzig: O. Schulze,1884), p. 4 n. I.Google Scholar

6 Al-Maqdisi, , Ahsanat-taqāsim fi ma'rifat al-aqālim, ed. deGoeje, M. J. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1906), p.37, lines 5, 7–8 (hereafter al-Maqdisī).Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. 38, lines 8–9.

8 Ibid., p. 142, line 11.

9 Shahrastāni, , al-Milal wa'n-nihal,Google Scholar 5 vols. (on the margins of Ibn, Hazm, al-Fişal fi ‘;l-milal wa'l-ahwā’wa'n-nihal [Cairo: al-AdabiyaPress, 1317–1321/1899–1930]), II, 45, lines25–30, and p. 46, lines 15–16.Google Scholar

10 Ibn, Khaldun, al-Muqaddima (Cairo, 1274/1857–1858), p. 218,Google Scholar line I; in thetranslation of Rosenthal, F., The Muqaddimah, 3vols.[New York: Bollingen Foundation, 1958], III, 5,Google Scholar cited in Goldziher, , DieZâhiriten, p. 5n. 3.Google Scholar

11 Fihrist, p. 225,Google Scholar cited in Mez, , Renaissance of Islam, p. 209 n. 3.Google Scholar

12 A1-Maqdisi, , p. 37.Google Scholar

13 Subkī, ,Tabaqāt ash-shāfi'iya, 6 vols.(Cairo: al-Husaimiya Press, 1324–1906), II, 337.Google Scholar

14 Al-Maqdisī, , p. 37, line 5.Google Scholar

15 Ash-Sha'rāni, ,Kitāb al-Mīzāa, a vols. (Cairo:Qasalli, 1279/1862–1863), I, 63,Google Scholar cited inGoldziher, , Die Zdhiriten, p. 37 n.Google Scholar I.Sha'rānī was commenting here on a saying transmitted byAbū Bakr b. 'Aiyāsh (d. 193/808–809; see Ibn, al-'Imād, Shadharāt adh-dhahab, 8vols. [Cairo: Qudsi Press,1350/1931–1932[, I, 34, lines 5–9).Google Scholar

16 See G., Makdisi, ‘Ash'ari and the Ash'arites in Islamic Religious History,’ StudiaIslamica, Vol. 17 (1962).Google Scholar

17 On Zāhirism and giyās, seeGoldziher, , Die Zâhiriten;Google Scholar andArnaldez, R., Grammaire et théologie chez IbnHazm de Cordoue: Essai sur Ia structure et les conditions de Ia penséemusulmane (Paris: J. Vrin, 1956).Google Scholar

18 Makdisi, G., Jbn 'Aqil et larésurgence de l'Islam traditionaliste au XPesiècle (Damascus: Publications de l'InstitutFrançais de Damas, 1963), p. 280 and notes.Google Scholar