Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T01:53:29.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DARIUSH ZAHEDI, The Iranian Revolution Then and Now:Indications of Regime Instability (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2000). Pp. 215. $60.00cloth.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2002

Extract

In general, historians seldom venture into predicting the future. Their discipline and training guides them toward attempting to reconstruct the past by relying on research, scrutinized facts, deliberation, and analysis. Other disciplines seem sometimes to disagree. That historians do not venture into predictions does not arise from a conservative orientation in their discipline, which may lead to a lack of enthusiasm for adventure; it comes from a philosophical attitude toward study of human society that points up the fact that the task of reconstructing the past, when data are obtainable, is a monumental task. Doing the same for events that have yet to happen can easily turn into futile attempts precisely because of lack of adequate data for analysis. On rare occasions, of course, major events in history have been predicted. World War II is a good example. However, observers missed other, equally significant events. The fall of the Soviet Union and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are two examples.

Type
Book Review
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)