Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T05:55:49.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economics of an Internationalized Jerusalem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Richard J. Ward
Affiliation:
Washington, D.C.

Extract

Setting up an economic and financial mechanism for an internationalized Jerusalem, can undoubtedly be arranged, given an appropriate political climate. There are historic precedents for international or free cities and ports in which the currency exchange system, means of revenue raising, and maintenance of municipal functions and service have been worked out. Twenty years ago the United Nations examined the possibility and passed a resolution and statutes for administering an internationalized Jerusalem. Given the mandate and cooperation, an independent municipal government for Jerusalem can implement the flexible mechanisms devised for assuring an equitable exchange relationship between the Israeli pound and Jordanian dinar, or between these and an independent sector currency. The mechanism for carrying on trade and banking facilities and services can be worked out, if the parties involved are willing to cooperate. A permanent committee of economic and financial experts in the Finance Ministry would need to review the exchange rate and the banking and trade practice to determine whether the proposed mechanisms are actually working equitably for all concerned.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBILIOGRAPHY

Abbedy, I. A. (ed.), Jerusalem Economy (Jerusalem: Jerusalem Chamber of Commerce, 1950).Google Scholar
Arab Mission to Washington, Statement, ‘The Proposed Internationalisation of Jerusalem’, 4 08 (Washington, D.C., 1953).Google Scholar
ECA, Survey of the Economy of Trieste, 1930, 1948.Google Scholar
Foreign Policy Association, Danzig–The Polish Corridor (New York, 1927).Google Scholar
Foreign Policy Association, The International Problem of Tangier (New York, 1926).Google Scholar
H.M. Statistical Office, Memorandum of Understanding (U.K., U.S., Italy) Regarding Administration in Zone A of Free Territory of Trieste (London, 05 1952).Google Scholar
H.M. Statistical Office, Great Britain, Treaties, etc., 1910–, Convention regarding organization of the statute of the Tangier Zone (London, 1924).Google Scholar
Israel Mission to U.N., Memorandum on the Future of Jerusalem (Lake Success: United Nations, 1949).Google Scholar
Kimmich, , Christoph, , The Free City: Danzig and German Foreign Policy, 1919–1934 (Yale University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
League of Nations, Free City of Danzig (Geneva, 1925).Google Scholar
Martin-Chauffier, , Jean, , Trieste: libération de la Vénétie julienne, Conférence de Londres et de Paris, le problème de l'internationalisation (Paris: P. Hartman, 1947).Google Scholar
Morrow, , Ian, , The Peace Settlement in The German Polish Borderlands (Oxford University Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Rockauskas, , Constantine, , The Internationalization of Jerusalem (Washington Committee of World Order, 1956).Google Scholar
Stuart, , Graham, , The International City of Tangier (Stanford University Press; Oxford University Press, 1931; 2nd ed., Stanford University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Tchok, , Ivan, , The Problem of Trieste (Ridgefield, Conn.: Acorn Press, 1943).Google Scholar
Unger, , Leonard, , The Economy of the Free Territory of Trieste (New York, American Geographical Society, 1948).Google Scholar
United Nations, Question of an International Regime for the Jerusalem Area (Lake Success: United Nations, 1950).Google Scholar
Ward, R. J. et al. , A Palestine Entity (The Middle East Institute, Washington, D.C., 1970).Google Scholar