Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

What do ‘lay’ people know about justice? An empirical enquiry

  • Charlie Irvine (a1)

Abstract

When mediation places decision-making power in the hands of lay disputants it raises troubling issues. Can justice be delivered without judicial assistance? What is the effect on the legal system? And how should outcomes thus achieved be regarded? Critics have tended to answer negatively, pointing to a range of harms including individual oppression and the vanishing trial. Such views, focusing too narrowly on conformity to legal norms, overlook ordinary people's capacity for justice reasoning. A recent Scottish pilot study of small-claims mediation parties illustrates the richness and complexity of their thinking around whether, and for how much, to settle. This suggests that mediation settlements, rather than representing second-class justice, may enhance the legitimacy of the legal system. Implications for theories of justice are considered.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail: charlie.irvine@strath.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Abel, RL (1982) The contradictions of informal justice. In Abel, RL (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, Vol. 1: The American Experience. New York: Academic Press, pp. 267320.
Ajjawi, R and Higgs, J (2007) Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report 12, 612638.
Aristotle, (no date) The Nichomachean Ethics. Internet Classics Archive. Available at http://classics.mit.edu/index.html (accessed 14 April 2020).
Arthurs, HW (1985) Without the Law: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Astor, H (2007) Mediator neutrality: making sense of theory and practice. Social and Legal Studies 16, 221239.
Auchie, DP et al. (2015) The Scottish Arbitration Survey. Edinburgh. Available at https://www.lawscot.org.uk/media/544422/Scottish-Arbitration-Survey-June-2015.pdf (accessed 5 January 2019).
Auerbach, JS (1983) Justice without Law: Resolving Disputes without Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beer, J and Packard, C (2012) The Mediator's Handbook, 4th edn. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
Belhorn, SR (2005) Settling beyond the shadow of the law: how mediation can make the most of social norms. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 20, 9811026.
Bilsky, L and Fisher, T (2014) Rethinking settlement. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 15, 77123.
Bok, DC (1983) A flawed system of law practice and training. Journal of Legal Education 33, 570585.
Bollen, K, Ittner, H and Euwema, MC (2012) Mediating hierarchical labor conflicts: procedural justice makes a difference – for subordinates. Group Decision and Negotiation 21, 621636.
Bourdieu, P (1987) The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal 38, 814853.
Brockner, J et al. (2001) Culture and procedural justice: the influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37, 300315.
Budnitz, ME (1994) Arbitration of disputes between consumers and financial institutions: a serious threat to consumer protection. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 10, 267342.
Bush, RAB and Folger, J (1994) The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bush, RAB and Folger, J (2005) The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict, 2nd edn.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cappelletti, M (1993) Alternative dispute resolution processes within the framework of the world-wide access-to-justice movement. The Modern Law Review 56, 282296.
Carmichael, NG (2013) The extent (or limit) of mediator influence to effect settlement. Dispute Resolution Journal 68, 2132.
Charkoudian, L, Eisenberg, DT and Walter, JL (2017) What difference does ADR make? Comparison of ADR and trial outcomes in small claims court. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 35, 745.
Cicero, (1961) The Republic. Keyes, C (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clark, B (2011) Lawyers’ resistance to mediation: a Scottish perspective. In Rediscovering Mediation in the 21st Century, 2nd CAMA Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 24–25 February 2011, pp. 112.
Coben, JR (2004) Gollum, meet Smeagol: a schizophrenic rumination on mediator values beyond self-determination and neutrality. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 5, 6586.
Cohen, AJ (2009a) Dispute systems design, neoliberalism, and the problem of scale. Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series 14, 5180.
Cohen, AJ (2009b) Revisiting against settlement: some reflections on dispute resolution and public values. Fordham Law Review 78, 11431170.
Colatrella, MT (2014) Informed consent in mediation: promoting pro se parties’ informed settlement choice while honoring the mediator's ethical duties. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 15, 705775.
Collett, JL (2008) Is procedural justice enough? Affect, attribution, and conflict in alternative dispute resolution. In Hegtvedt, KA and Clay-Warner, J (eds), Advances in Group Processes: Justice. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, pp. 267289.
Coy, PG and Hedeen, T (2005) A stage model of social movement co-optation: community mediation in the United States. Sociological Quarterly 46, 405435.
Creutzfeldt, N and Bradford, B (2016) Dispute resolution outside of courts: procedural justice and decision acceptance among users of Ombuds services in the UK. Law and Society Review 50, 9851016.
Delgado, R (1988) ADR and the dispossessed: recent books about the deformalization movement. Law and Social Inquiry 13, 145154.
Delgado, R et al. (1985) Fairness and formality: minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution. Wisconsin Law Review 6, 13591404.
Deutsch, M (2014) Justice and conflict. In Coleman, PT, Deutsch, M and Marcus, EC (eds), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 2955.
Dwyer, D (2008) Beyond Kelsen and Hart? MacCormick's institutions of law. Modern Law Review 71, 823839.
Eisenberg, DT (2016) What we know (and need to know) about court-annexed dispute resolution. South Carolina Law Review (Legal Studies Research Paper) 67, 118.
Engle-Merry, S (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Engle-Merry, S (1993) Sorting out popular justice. In Merry, SE (ed.), The Possiblity of Popular Justice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 3166.
Epstein, L and Martin, AD (2014) An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erlanger, HS and Klegon, DA (1978) Socialization effects of professional school: the law school experience and student orientations to public interest concerns. Law & Society Review 13, 1135.
Farrell, IP (2006) H.L.A. Hart and the methodology of jurisprudence. Texas Law Review 84, 9831011.
Felstiner, WLF, Abel, RL and Sarat, A (1981) The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming …. Law and Society Review 15, 631654.
Finnis, J (2011) Philosophy of Law: Introduction. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1850674 (accessed 7 September 2018).
Fiss, O (1984) Against settlement. The Yale Law Journal 93, 10731090.
Foucault, M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Random House.
Frey, MA (2000) Does ADR offer second class justice? Tulsa Law Journal 36, 727766.
Fuller, L (1969) The Morality of Law, revised edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fuller, L (1971) Mediation: its forms and functions. Southern California Law Review 44, 305339.
Galanter, M (1974) Why the haves come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review 9, 95160.
Galanter, M (1981) Justice in many rooms: courts, private ordering, and indigenous law. Journal of Legal Pluralism 19, 147.
Galanter, M (1988) The quality of settlements. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1988, 5584.
Galanter, M (2004) The vanishing trial: an examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1, 459570.
Gardner, J (2018) The Twilight of Legality. University of Oxford Legal Research Paper, 4/2018. Oxford.
Genn, H (2012a) What is civil justice for? Reform, ADR, and access to justice. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 24, 397417.
Genn, H (2012b) Why the Privatization of Civil Justice Is a Rule of Law Issue. London. Available at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/judicial-institute/layout-components/36th_F_A_Mann_Lecture_19.11.12_Professor_Hazel_Genn.pdf (accessed 9 September 2018).
Genn, H, Partington, M and Wheeler, S (2006) Law in the Real World: Improving Our Understanding of How Law Works. Final Report and Recommendations. London. Available at https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/LawintheRealWorldfullreport.pdf (accessed 11 June 2018).
Genn, H et al. . (2007) Twisting Arms: Court Referred and Court Linked Mediation under Judicial Pressure. London. Available at https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110201151141/http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/Twisting-arms-mediation-report-Genn-et-al.pdf (accessed 7 January 2019).
Gilligan, C (1982) In a Difference Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gordon, R (1999) The radical conservatism of the practice of justice. Stanford Law Review 51, 919933.
Greatbatch, D and Dingwall, R (1989) Selective facilitation: some preliminary observations on a strategy used by divorce mediators. Law and Society Review 23, 613642.
Grillo, T (1991) The mediation alternative: process dangers for women. The Yale Law Journal 100, 15451610.
Grix, J (2010) The Foundations of Research, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Halpin, A (2006) The methodology of jurisprudence: thirty years off the point. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 67, 67105.
Harrington, CB (1982) Delegalisation reform movements: a historical analysis. In Abel, RL (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, Vol. 1. The American Experience. New York: American Press.
Hart, HLA (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Haynes, J and Haynes, G (1989) Mediating Divorce: Casebook of Strategies for Successful Family Mediation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hillyard, P (2007) Law's empire : socio-legal empirical research in the twenty-first century. Journal of Law and Society 34, 266279.
Hyman, JM (2014) Swimming in the deep end: dealing with justice in mediation. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 1956.
Hyman, JM and Love, LP (2002) If Portia were a mediator: an inquiry into justice in mediation. Clinical Law Review 9, 157193.
Irvine, C (2007) Mediation's Values: An Examination of the Values behind Five Mediation Texts. Birkbeck University of London: Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1686195: (accessed 12 January 2019).
Irvine, C (2010) The sound of one hand clapping: the Gill Review's faint praise for mediation. Edinburgh Law Review 14, 8592.
Irvine, C (2012) Scotland's ‘mixed’ feelings about mediation. SSRN eLibrary 27.
Irvine, C (2015) Lawyers of the future on mediation: threat or promise? Kluwer Mediation Blog. Available at http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/06/14/lawyers-of-the-future-on-mediation-threat-or-a-promise/ (accessed 4 January 2019).
Irvine, C (2016) And finally... some plain English from Scotland. Kluwer Mediation Blog. Available at http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/09/10/and-finally-some-good-news-from-scotland/ (accessed 7 January 2019).
Kelsen, H (1934) The pure theory of law: its method and fundamental concepts. Law Quarterly Review 50, 474498.
Kelsen, H (1967) The Pure Theory of Law, 2nd edn. Knight M (trans.). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Kennedy, D (1982) Legal education and the reproduction of hierarchy. Journal of Legal Education 32, 591615.
King, M et al. (2014) Non-adversarial Justice, 2nd edn.Leichardt, NSW: Federation Press.
King, N (2004) Using interviews in qualitative research. In Cassell, C and Symon, G (eds), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage, pp. 1123.
Korobkin, RB (2005) The role of law in settlement. In Moffitt, M and Bordone, R (eds), The Handbook of Dispute Resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 254276.
Lande, J (2005) Shifting the focus from the myth of ‘the vanishing trial’ to complex conflict management systems, or I learned almost everything I need to know about conflict resolution from Marc Galanter. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 191.
Leveson, SB (2015) Security and Justice: Court and Tribunals Judiciary. Available at https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/announcements/speech-by-sir-brian-leveson-security-and-justice/ (accessed 14 April 2020).
Lind, EA (2001) Fairness heuristic theory: justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Greenberg, J and Cropanzano, R (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 5688.
Lind, EA and Arndt, C (2017) Regulations, fairness and trust. In OECD (ed.), Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 6785.
Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd LCJ of E and W (2015) The centrality of justice: its contribution to society, and its delivery. Lord Williams of Mostyn Memorial Lecture. London: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, pp. 119.
Luban, D (1995) Settlements and the erosion of the public realm. Georgetown Law Journal 83, 26192662.
MacCoun, RJ (2005) Voice, control and belonging: the double-edged sword of procedural fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1, 171201.
Macfarlane, J (2001) Why do people settle? McGill Law Journal 46, 663711.
MacIntyre, A (1988) Whose Justice, which Rationality? London: Duckworth.
Maroney, TA (2011) The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion. California Law Review 99, 629681.
Maroney, TA (2012) Angry judges. Vanderbilt Law Review 65, 12051286.
Mayer, B (2012) The Dynamics of Conflict: A Guide to Engagement and Intervention, 2nd edn.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mayer, B et al. (2012) Core values of dispute resolution: is neutrality necessary? Marquette Law Review 95, 805828.
McCoubrey, H and White, ND (1996) Textbook on Jurisprudence, 2nd edn. London: Blackstone Press Ltd.
McGregor, L (2015) Alternative dispute resolution and human rights: developing a rights-based approach through the ECHR. European Journal of International Law 26, 607634.
Menkel-Meadow, C (1991) Pursuing settlement in an adversary culture: a tale of innovation co-opted or ‘the law of ADR’. Florida State University Law Review 19, 147.
Menkel-Meadow, C (1997) What Trina taught me: reflections on mediation, inequality, teaching and life. Minnesota Law Review 81, 14131428.
Menkel-Meadow, C (2006) Empirical studies of ADR: the baseline problem of what ADR is and what it is compared to. In Cane, P and Kritzer, H (eds), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148.
Miles, MB, Huberman, AM and Saldana, J (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Mnookin, RH and Kornhauser, L (1979) Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce. Yale Law Journal 88, 950997.
Moore, CW (1986) The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, CW (2014) The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict, 4th edn.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mulcahy, L (2000) Between the devil and the deep blue sea? A critique of the ability of community mediation to suppress and facilitate participation in civil life. Journal of Law and Society 27, 133150.
Mulcahy, L (2013) The collective interest in private dispute resolution. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33, 5980.
Nader, L (1979) Disputing without the force of law. The Yale Law Journal 88, 9981021.
Nesbit, R, Nabatchi, T and Bingham, LB (2012) Employees, supervisors, and workplace mediation. Review of Public Personnel Administration 32, 260287.
Nolan-Haley, J (1999) Informed consent in mediation: a guiding principle for truly educated decisionmaking. Notre Dame Law Review 74, 775840.
Nolan-Haley, J and Annor-Ohene, JK (2014) Procedural justice beyond borders: mediation in Ghana. Harvard Negotiation Law Review Online 119.
Noone, MA and Akin, Ojelabi L (2014) Ensuring access to justice in mediation within the civil justice system. Monash University Law Review 40, 528563.
Osler, D (2007) The fantasy men. Rechtsgeschichte 10, 169193.
Paul, GD and Dunlop, JA (2014) The other voice in the room: restorative justice faciliators’ constructions of justice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 31, 257283.
Pavlakos, G (2004) Normativity v ontology: law, facts and practical reason. Rechtstheorie 34, 393420.
Pearce, WB (2006) Doing Research from the Perspective of the Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM). Santa Barbara, CA. Available at https://www.taosinstitute.net/Websites/taos/files/Content/5692988/Overview_of_CMM_in_Research_version_2.0.pdf (accessed 10 June 2018).
Perschbacher, RR and Bassett, DL (2004) The end of law. Boston University Law Review 84, 162.
Pound, R (1944) What is a profession – the rise of the legal profession in antiquity. Notre Dame Law Review 19, 203228.
Quintanilla, VD, Allen, RA and Hirt, ER (2017) The signaling effect of pro se status. Law and Social Inquiry 42, 10911121.
Raz, J (1975) Practical Reason and Norms. London: Hutchinson & Co.
Reda, DS (2010) Critical conflicts between first-wave and feminist critical approaches to alternative dispute resolution. Texas Journal of Women and the Law 20, 193229.
Reid, D (2008) Thomas Aquinas and Viscount Stair: the influence of scholastic moral theology on Stair's account of restitution and recompense. Journal of Legal History 29, 189214.
Reid, KGC (2003) The idea of mixed legal systems. Tulane Law Review 78, 540.
Relis, T (2007) ‘It's not about the money!’: a theory on misconceptions of plaintiff's litigation aims. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 68, 701746.
Relis, T (2009) Perceptions in Litigation and Mediation: Lawyers, Defendants, Plaintiffs, and Gendered Parties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Resnik, J (2002) Mediating preferences: litigant preferences for process and judicial preferences for settlement. Journal of Dispute Resolution 2002, 155169.
Rifkin, J, Millen, J and Cobb, S (1991) Toward a new discourse for mediation: a critique of neutrality. Mediation Quarterly 9, 151164.
Riskin, L (2005) Replacing the mediator orientation grids, again: the new new grid system. Alternatives 23, 127132.
Riskin, LL (1996) Understanding mediators’ orientations, strategies, and techniques: a grid for the perplexed. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 1, 752.
Ritchie, J et al. (2014) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Roberts, S and Palmer, M (2005) Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rommen, H (1936/1998) The Natural Law. Hanley, TR (trans.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Ross, M and Bain, D (2010) Report on Evaluation of In Court Mediation Schemes in Glasgow and Aberdeen Sheriff Courts. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.
Ross, ML (2006) Mediation in Scotland: an elusive opportunity? In Alexander, N (ed.), Global Trends in Mediation, 2nd edn.Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International B.V., pp. 305331.
Rubinson, R (2016) Of grids and gatekeepers: the socioeconomics of mediation. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 17, 873907.
Ryder, SE (2015) In the Shadow of Magna Carta. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Available at https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/announcements/speech-by-sir-ernest-ryder-in-the-shadow-of-magna-carta/ (accessed 14 September 2018).
Sabatino, JM (1998) ADR as ‘litigation lite’: procedural and evidentiary norms embedded within alternative dispute resolution. Emory Law Journal 47, 12891349.
Samuel, G (2009) Interdisciplinarity and the authority paradigm: should law be taken seriously by scientists and social scientists? Journal of Law and Society 36, 431459.
Sandefur, RL (2008) Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality. Annual Review of Sociology 34, 339358.
Sander, FEA (1985) Alternative methods of dispute resolution: an overview. University of Florida Law Review 37, 118.
Sarat, A (1990) ‘… the Law Is All Over’: power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 2, 343379.
Schauer, F (2006) Do cases make bad law? University of Chicago Law Review 73, 883918.
Schwartz, JR (1999) Laymen cannot lawyer, but is mediation the practice of law? Cardozo Law Journal 20, 17151746.
Scotland, J (2012) Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching 5, 916.
Scottish Civil Courts Review (2009) Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review. Edinburgh.
Scottish Civil Justice Council (2017) The New Civil Procedure Rules: First Report. Available at http://www.scottishciviljusticecouncil.gov.uk/docs/librariesprovider4/consultations/scjc-consultations/the-new-civil-procedure-rules-first-report-and-annex.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed 10 January 2019).
Scottish Statutory Instruments (2016) SHERIFF COURT Act of Sederunt (Simple Procedure) 2016. Edinburgh.
Seron, C et al. (2001) The impact of legal counsel on outcomes for poor tenants in New York City's housing court: results of a randomized experiment. Law and Society Review 35, 419434.
Seth, R (2000) Mediation: The Great Equalizer? A Critical Theory Analysis. Canadian Forum on Civil Justice. Available at http://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/hosted/16171-mediation_equalizer.pdf (accessed 16 November 2018).
Seul, JR (2004) Settling signficant cases. Washington Law Review 79, 881968.
Shestowsky, D and Brett, J (2008) Disputants’ perceptions of dispute resolution procedures: an ex ante and ex post longitudinal empirical study. Connecticut Law Review 41, 63107.
Shiner, L (1982) Reading Foucault: anti-method and the genealogy of power-knowledge. History and Theory 21, 382398.
Sikveland, R and Stokoe, E (2016) Dealing with resistance in initial intake and inquiry calls to mediation: the power of ‘willing’. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 33, 235254.
Silbey, SS (2005) After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1, 323368.
Singer, LR (1979) Nonjudicial dispute resolution mechanisms: the effects on justice for the poor. Clearinghouse Review 13, 569.
Smith, A (1759/1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 1976 edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Smith, TB (1970) Scottish nationalism, law and self-government. In McCormack, N (ed.), The Scottish Debate. London: OUP.
Solum, LB (2005) Procedural justice. Southern California Law Review 78, 181322.
Stair, (1681) Institutions of the Law of Scotland, 1832 edn. Edinburgh: Bell and Bradfute.
Stets, JE and Osborn, SN (2008) Injustice and emotions using identity theory. Advances in Group Processes 25, 151179.
Stulberg, JB (2012) Must a mediator be neutral? You'd better believe it! Marquette Law Review 95, 829858.
Stulberg, JP (1998) Fairness and mediation. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 13, 909945.
Stulberg, JP (2005) Mediation and justice: what standards govern? Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 144.
Sturm, S (2005) Law's role in addressing complex discrimination. In Neilson, LB and Nelson, RL (eds), Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3557.
Tamanaha, BZ (2019) The promise and conundrums of pluralist jurisprudence. The Modern Law Review 82, 159179.
Taylor, JA (2013) Review of Expenses and Funding of Civil Litigation in Scotland Report. Edinburgh. Available at https://www2.gov.scot/Publications/2013/10/8023/5 (accessed 14 September 2018).
Teubner, G (1989) How the law thinks: toward a constructivist epistemology of law. Law and Society Review 23, 727758.
Tyler, TR (2006) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Waldman, E (2004) The concept of justice in mediation: a psychobiography. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 247271.
Waldman, E and Akin, Ojelabi L (2016) Mediators and substantive justice: a view from Rawls’ original position. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 30, 391430.
Waldman, EA (1997) Identifying the role of social norms in mediation: a multiple model approach. Hastings Law Journal 48, 703769.
Wall, JA and Chan-Serafin, S (2014) Friendly persuasion in civil case mediations. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 31, 285303.
Wall, JA and Kressel, K (2017) Mediator thinking in civil cases. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 34, 331367.
Webley, L (2010) Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. In Cane, P and Kritzer, H (eds), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121.
Weinstein, JB (1996) Some benefits and risks of privatization of justice through ADR. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 11, 241295.
Welsh, NA (2001) Making deals in court-connected mediation: what's justice got to do with it. Washington University Law Quarterly 79, 787861.
Welsh, NA (2002) Disputants’ decision control in court-connected mediation: a hollow promise without procedural justice. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1, 179192.
Wexler, S (1970) Practicing law for poor people. The Yale Law Journal 79, 10491067.
Wheeler, C (2014) What is ‘fair’ and ‘reasonable’ depends a lot on your perspective. Australian Journal of Administrative Law 22, 6376.
Whittemore, R, Chase, SK and Mandle, CL (2001) Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 11, 522537.
Wilson, B and Wilson, A (2006) Why is fairness ‘grubby?’ – semantics, etymology, and perspectives in dispute resolution. Texas Wesleyan Law Review 13, 795817.
Winslade, J and Monk, G (2002) A narrative approach in mediation. Context 63, 912.
Wissler, RL et al. (2002) Court-connected mediation in general civil cases: what we know from empirical research. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 17, 641.
Yoon, A (2009) Importance of litigant wealth. DePaul Law Review 59, 649673.

Keywords

What do ‘lay’ people know about justice? An empirical enquiry

  • Charlie Irvine (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.