Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T09:53:44.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thinking culturally about risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

Adam Burgess*
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent

Extract

Ferrari's book is a welcome addition to the still limited literature on the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) experience which, unlike any other specific response to a disease, played an important role in reshaping modern governance and consolidating key assumptions about the world around us. The ‘mad cow’ crisis began in 1986 when the unfathomable bovine brain disease was identified, but was then reignited with the shocking discovery a decade later that it could pass, and had passed, to humans despite the controls put in place. Scientific confirmation in 1996 that there was a human form of BSE led to political panic and further undermined the then exhausted Conservative Party rule. The retrospective lessons of the experience went far beyond agriculture. The problem was perceived to be one of openness and independence: perhaps government was too dependent upon lobbies and financial interests such as agriculture and, whilst utilising scientific advice, did not allow their independent voice to have influence. Less widely recognised, but even more importantly, the political lesson of the BSE experience was to henceforth tend to avoid being seen to downplay risk, based on the retrospective view that the danger could, and should, have been announced before it was scientifically confirmed. Better to overestimate even apparently limited risks than be caught again committing the now cardinal sin of downplaying them, or simply remaining silent. This is not so much a new-found principle of risk aversion as a variation on an age-old political truism of, above all, making sure that the next crisis is ‘not on my watch’.

Type
Review essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booker, Christopher and North, Richard (2007) Scared to Death: From BSE to Global Warming – Why Scares are Costing Us the Earth. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Burgess, Adam (2004) Cellular Phones, Public Fears and a Culture of Precaution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron (1982) Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Dan (2009) Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear. London: Virgin Publishing.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd (2003) Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hammitt, James K., Wiener, Jonathan B., Swedlow, Brendan, Kall, Denise and Zhou, Zheng (2005) ‘Precautionary Regulation in Europe and the United States: A Quantitative Comparison’, Risk Analysis 25: 1215–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, Philip (2010) Bad Laws. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Packer, Richard (2007) The Politics of BSE. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, Nick, Kasperson, Roger and Slovic, Paul (2003) The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, Paul (1987) ‘Perception of Risk’, Science 236: 280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starr, Chauncey (1969) ‘Social Benefits versus Social Risks’, Science 165: 1228–32.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass (2004) Risk and Reason: Safety, Law and the Environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard and Sunstein, Cass (2008) Nudge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Viklund, Mattias (2003) ‘Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross-national Study’, Risk Analysis 23: 727–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Ben (2009) What Price Liberty? London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar