Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:36:40.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A social systems approach to understanding the racial effect of the Section 44 counter-terror stop and search powers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2015

Rachel Herron
Rachel Herron*
Affiliation:
Email: r.c.herron@dunelm.org.uk
*
r.c.herron@dunelm.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2010, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) endorsed long-standing claims of the potentially discriminatory effect of the suspicionless stop and search powers within s.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. This paper applies principles of social systems theory to propose an explanation for the empirically evidenced racial effect of the s.44 police powers. Through observations regarding communicative barriers apparent between the law-making and policing subsystems, the paper argues that each subsystem's understanding of the expectations of the other, pertaining to the nature and use of the s.44 powers, contributed to their deployment in a way that diminished the effectiveness of the safeguards intended to guard against their misuse. Mismatched subsystem expectations meant that the powers were implemented by the police without the statutory protections, the operational self-restraint, or the type of intelligence-led judgment expected by the legislature, giving rise to misuse of the powers and, in particular, their deployment in line with race-based profiles.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 4: Critical Socio-legal Engagements with Systems Thinking , December 2015 , pp. 383 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2007) Introduction to Intelligence-Led Policing. London: ACPO.Google Scholar
Ardau, Claudia and Van Munster, Rens (2009) ‘Exceptionalism and the “War on Terror”: Criminology Meets International Relations’, British Journal of Criminology 49(5): 686–701.Google Scholar
Bland, Nick, Miller, Joel and Quinton, Paul (2000) Upping the PACE? An Evaluation of the Recommendations of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry on Stops and Searches (Policy Research Series Paper 128). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Bowling, Ben and Phillips, Coretta (2007) ‘Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search’, Modern Law Review 70(6): 936–961.Google Scholar
BTP (British Transport Police) (2004) Annual Report 2003–04. London: BTP.Google Scholar
BTP (British Transport Police) (2006) Annual Report 2005–06. London: BTP.Google Scholar
BTP (British Transport Police) (2007) Annual Report 2006–07. London: BTP.Google Scholar
BTP (British Transport Police) (2008) Annual Report 2007–08. London: BTP.Google Scholar
BTP (British Transport Police) (2009) Annual Report 2008–09. London: BTP.Google Scholar
Cashmore, Ellis (2001) ‘The Experiences of Ethnic Minority Police Officers in Britain: Under Recruitment and Racial Profiling in a Performance Culture’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(4): 642–659.Google Scholar
Cashmore, Ellis (2002) ‘Behind the Window Dressing: Ethnic Minority Police Perspective on Cultural Diversity’, Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies 28(2): 327–341.Google Scholar
Cavell, Anna (2009) ‘Capital Sees Rise in Terror Stops’, BBC News, 6 May 2009, online: <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/8034315.stm>.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier and Ringelheim, Julie (2008) ‘Ethnic Profiling: A Rising Challenge for European Human Rights Law’, Modern Law Review 71: 358–384.Google Scholar
Dodd, Vikram (2002) ‘Terror Act Cited to Defend Stop and Search’, The Guardian (London), 6 February 2002, online: <http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/feb/06/terrorism.ukcrime>.Google Scholar
Dodd, Vikram (2005) ‘Asian Men Targeted in Stop and Search’, The Guardian (London), 16 August 2005, online: <http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/aug/17/race.july7>.Google Scholar
Dodd, Vikram (2010) ‘Stop and Search Plans are “Discriminatory” Watchdog Warns’, The Guardian (London), 15 November 2010, online: <http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/nov/15/stop-and-search-equality-commission>.Google Scholar
EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission) (2009) Police and Racism: What Has Been Achieved 10 Years after the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report. London: EHRC.Google Scholar
Ericson, Richard and Doyle, Aaron (2004) Uncertain Business: Risk, Insurance and the Limits of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (2004) Third Report on the United Kingdom. London: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Evans, Rob and Lewis, Paul (2010) ‘Teenagers Force Apology from Police over Kingston Stop and Search’, The Guardian (London), 10 June 2010, online: <http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/10/teenagers-police-kingsnorth>.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Helen and Choudhury, Tufyal (2011) The Impact of Counter Terrorism Measures on Muslim Communities in Britain (Research Report 72). London: ECHR.Google Scholar
Foster, Janet, Newburn, Tim and Souhami, Anna (2005) Assessing the Impact of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (Home Office Research Study 294) London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gohill, Neha Singh and Sidhu, Dawinder S. (2007–08) ‘The Sikh Turban: Post 9/11 Challenges to this Article of Faith’, Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion 9(2): 1–60.Google Scholar
Hillyard, Patrick (1993) Suspect Community: People's Experiences of the Prevention of Terrorism Acts in Britain. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Holdaway, Simon and O'neill, Megan (2007) ‘Where Has all the Racism Gone/Views of Racism within Constabularies after Macpherson’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(3): 397–415.Google Scholar
Home Affairs Committee (2005) Terrorism and Community Relations, HC 165-I. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Home Office Circular (2004) s.44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (38/2004). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office Circular (2008) Authorisations of Stop and Search Powers under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (027/2008). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office Statistical Bulletin (2009a) Operation of Police Powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 and Subsequent Legislation: Arrests, Outcomes and Stops and Searches, Great Britain 2008/09. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office Statistical Bulletin (2009b) Statistics on Terrorism Arrests and Outcomes Great Britain, 11 September 2001 to 31 March 2008. London; HMSO.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2010) Without Suspicion. Stop and Search under the Terrorism Act 2000. London: HRW.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto (1970) ‘Biology of Cognition', reprinted in Zeleny, Milan (ed.), (1981) Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organization. New York: Elsevier North Holland Inc.Google Scholar
JCHR (Joint Committee on Human Rights) (2004) Review of Counter-terrorism Powers, 18th Report of Session 2003–04 (HL158/HC713). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
King, Michael and Thornhill, Christopher (2003) Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Politics and Law. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Laville, Sandra (2002) ‘More Face Stop and Search to Deter Terrorists, Say Police’, The Guardian (London).Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul (2010) ‘Stop and Search Photographer Held again under Terror Laws’, The Guardian (London, 10 May 2010), online: <http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/may/10/stop-search-photographer-grant-smith>.Google Scholar
Lloyd (Lord) (1996) Inquiry into Legislation against Terrorism (vol. 1 Cm 3420). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Liberty (2010) From ‘War’ to Law: Liberty's Response to the Coalition Government's Review of Counter-terrorism and Security Powers. London: Liberty.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1982) The Differentiation of Society, trans. Holmes, Stephen and Larmore, Charles. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1986) Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1990) Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social Systems, trans. Bednarz, John Jr. and Baecker, Dirk. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, William (Sir) (1999) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry by Sir William of Cluny. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living. Dorecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Police Authority (2007) Report of the MPA Scrutiny on MPS Stop and Search Practice. London: MPA.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Police Authority (2009) Section 44 Terrorism Act 2000 - Tactical Use Review (7 May 2009). London: MPA.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Police Service (2004) Scrutiny on MPS Stop and Search Practice. London: MPS.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Police Service (2008) Stop and Search Equality Impact Assessment. London: MPS.Google Scholar
Moeckli, Daniel (2005) ‘Discriminatory Profiles: Law Enforcement after 9/11 and 7/7’, European Human Rights Law Review 5: 517–532.Google Scholar
Moeckli, Daniel (2007) ‘Stop and Search under the Terrorism Act 2000: A Comment on Re R (Gillan)’, Modern Law Review 70(4): 659–670.Google Scholar
NPIA (National Police Improvement Agency) (2008) Practice Advice on Stop and Search in Relation to Terrorism. London: NPIAGoogle Scholar
Pantazis, Christina and Pemberton, Simon (2009) ‘From the “Old” to the “New” Suspect Communities’, British Journal of Criminology 49(5): 646–666.Google Scholar
Pantazis, Christina and Pemberton, Simon (2011) ‘Restating the Case for the Suspect Community: A Reply to Greer’, British Journal of Criminology 51(6): 1054–1062.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, Scott, Colin, Lacey, Nicola and Braithwaite, John (2004) Regulating Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Gavin (2007) ‘Deference, Discretion, and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’, Current Legal Problems 60(1): 40–78.Google Scholar
Přibáň, Jiří and Nelken, David (2001) Law's New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. J. (1997) Report on the Operation in 1996 of the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act of 1989. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Stone, Richard (2006) ‘Police Powers and Human Rights in the Context of Terrorism’, Management Law 48(4): 384–399.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law and Society Review 17: 239–285.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Christopher (2011) A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitution and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Alan (2010) ‘No Terror Arrests in 100,000 Police Counter-terror Searches, Figures Show’, The Guardian (London, 28 October 2010), online: <http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/oct/28/terrorism-police-stop-search-arrests>.Google Scholar
Van Munster, Rens (2004) ‘The War on Terror: When Exception Becomes the Rule’, International Journal for the Semiotics of the Law 17(2): 141–153.Google Scholar
Walker, Clive (2003) ‘Intelligence and Anti-terrorism Law in the United Kingdom’, Crime, Law and Social Change 44(5): 387–422.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Tom (2010) ‘No Arrests in over 100,000 Stops and Searches’, The Telegraph (London, 28 October 2010).Google Scholar