Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:51:09.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of bureaucrats in designing policy outcomes: the case of the 2002 General Security Service (GSS) Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2015

Assaf Meydani
Assaf Meydani*
Affiliation:
Assaf Meydani is an Associate Professor in the School of Government and Society at Tel Aviv-Yaffo Academic College. Email: assafmei@mta.ac.il
*
assafmei@mta.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the 1980s, and mainly since the 1990s, studies in politics and law have adopted an economic attitude to explaining judicial behaviour. In contrast, this paper follows the individualistic approach by focusing on the role of individuals in bureaucracies in designing policy outcomes, using political entrepreneurship and new institutionalism as its theoretical framework. In describing a specific institutional change in Israel – the passage of the General Security Service Law in 2002 – I maintain that this institutional change is an equilibrium that resulted from the actions of empowered military bureaucrats acting as political entrepreneurs who sought to maximise their own political assets in the light of certain structural and cultural conditions, both local and international. The institutional arena was characterised by the inability of the government to function effectively (non-governability), enhanced judicialisation, the dominance of security issues in Israel, and the development of a unique shared mental model of alternative political culture. However, it was still open to changes based on new liberal attitudes about human rights. Thus, politicians influence and are influenced by a wide range of institutional norms and practices in a complex process of changes in institutional design.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 59 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arian, A. (1997) The Second Republic-Politics in Israel. Tel Aviv: Zmora-Bitan, Publishers.Google Scholar
Arian, A., Nachmias, D. and Amir, R. (2002) Executive Governance in Israel. Jerusalem: The Israel Democracy Institute [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Barak, A. and Mazoz, E. (eds) (1995) Landau Book, Vol. A. Tel Aviv: Bursi Law Books [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Barak-Erez, D. (2003) Key Sentences. Tel-Aviv: Ministry of Defense Publications.Google Scholar
Barzilai, G. (1992) Democracy at War: Debate and Consensus in Israel. Tel-Aviv: Poalim Library [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Barzilai, G. (1999) ‘Courts as Hegemonic Institutions: The Israeli Supreme Court in a Comparative Perspective’, Israel Affairs 5(2/3): 15–33.Google Scholar
Barzilai, G. and Inbar, E. (1996) ‘The Use of Force: Israeli Public Opinion on Military Options’, Armed Forces and Society 23(1): 49–50.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G. (1998) ‘Civil-Military Relations in Israel in the mid-1990's’, in Shapira, Anita (ed.), Independence: The First Fifty Years. Jerusalem: Shazar Center [in Hebrew], 471–486.Google Scholar
Brian, M. A. (1998) ‘A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell’, Working papers in Political Science, Stanford University, 88–97.Google Scholar
Bryner, G. (2007) ‘Public Organizations and Public Polices’, in Peters, Guy and Pierre, Jon (eds), The Handbook of Public Administration. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 189–199.Google Scholar
Canon, B. C. and Johnson, C. A. (1998) Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact, 2nd edn.Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, D. C. (2006) ‘Relational Attributes of Political Entrepreneurs: A Network Perspective’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(5): 757–778.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2014) ‘The Israeli Supreme Court's Political Role in Matters of National Security’ (3 February 2014), online: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2390411>..' href=https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2390411>CrossRef.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cohen,+A.+(2014)+‘The+Israeli+Supreme+Court's+Political+Role+in+Matters+of+National+Security’+(3+February+2014),+online:+.>Google Scholar
Cohen, N. (2012) ‘Policy Entrepreneurs and the Design of Public Policy: Conceptual Framework and the Case of the National Health Insurance Law in Israel’, Journal of Social Research & Policy 3(1): 5–26.Google Scholar
Cowan, T. A. (1958) ‘Group Interests’, Virginia Law Review 44: 331–345.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Denos, M. and Azrieli, S. (2008) Interviewing the Former GSS Attorney Arie Roter, ‘Terror without Winners’ Lawyers: Bar Association Magazine, Tel-Aviv and the Center County, 19: 29–31.Google Scholar
Doron, G. and Harris, M. (2000) Public Policy and Electoral Reform: The Case of Israel. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Doron, G. and Sened, I. (2001) Political Bargaining: Theory, Practice, and Process. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dror, Y. (1989) Memorandum for the Israeli Prime Minister: To Build a State. Jerusalem: Academon, the Hebrew University [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Edelman, M. (1995) ‘Israel’, in Tate, Neal C. and Vallinder, Torbjorn (eds), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York & London: New York University Press, 403–415.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. and Knight, J. (1998) The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, L., Segal, J. A., Spaeth, H. J. and Walker, T. G. (1994) The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. and Walker, T. G. (1995) Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. and Rubin, E. L. (1998) Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
François, A. (2003) ‘The Political Entrepreneur and the Coordination of the Political Process: A Market Process Perspective of the Political Market’, Review of Austrian Economics 16(2/3): 153–168.Google Scholar
Galnoor, I. (2004) ‘The Judicialization of the Public Domain in Israel’, Law and Government 7(1): 355–386 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Gely, R. and Spiller, P. T. (1990) ‘A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Case’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 263–300.Google Scholar
HERMAN, P. C. (1948) The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937–1947. New York: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Hertogh, M. and Halliday, S. (eds) (2004) Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact, International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofnung, M. (1991) Israel – State Security versus the Government of Law 1948–1991. Jerusalem: Nevo Publishing House [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Hofnung, M. (1999) ‘Israeli Constitutional Politics: The Fragility of Impartiality’, Israel Affairs 5(2/3): 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holder, J. and Lee, M. (2007) Environmental Protection, Law and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, K. M. (ed.) (1991) Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. and Lissak, M. (1989) Trouble in Utopia: The Overburdened Polity of Israel. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Lindquist, E. (2004) ‘Policy Analysis and Governance: Analytical and Policy Styles in Canada’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice 6(3): 225–251.Google Scholar
Kerwin, C. (1999) Rulemaking. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edn.New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kleiman, A. and Pedatzur, R. (1991) Rearming Israe–Defence Procurement Through the 1990's. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A. (1975) ‘The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective’, Journal of Law and Economics 18: 875–901.Google Scholar
Lehman-Wilzig, S. N. (1992) Wildfire: Grassroots Revolts in Israel in the Post-Socialist Era. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1993) ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services’, in Hill, Michael (ed.), The Policy Process: A Reader. London: Prentice Hall / Harvester Wheatsheaf, 389–392.Google Scholar
López, E. J. (2002) ‘The Legislator as Political Entrepreneur: Investment in Political Capital’, Review of Austrian Economics 15(2/3): 211–228.Google Scholar
Macey, J. R. (1987) ‘Competing Economic Views of the Constitution’, George Washington Law Review 56: 50–80.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C., North, D. and Shariq, S. (2004) ‘Learning, Institutions and Economic Performance’, Perspectives on Politics 2: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mautner, M. (1993) The Decline of Formalism and the Rise of Values in Israeli Law. Tel-Aviv: Ma'agalay Da'at [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Mautner, M. (2002) ‘Law and Culture in Israel: The 1950s and the 1980s’, in Harris, R., Kedar, A., Lahav, P. and Likhovski, A. (eds), The History of Law in a Multi-Cultural Society: Israel 1917–1967. Aldershot: Ashgate, 175–217.Google Scholar
Mccann, M. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meydani, A. (2008) ‘Political Entrepreneurs and Electoral Capital: The Case of the Israeli State Economy Arrangement Law’, Constitutional Political Economy, 19(4): 301–312.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. (2000) Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. (2006). ‘Policy Entrepreneurs, Think Tanks, and Trusts’, in Miller, R. (ed.), New Zealand Government and Politics. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 536–546.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. (2009) ‘Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change’, Policy Studies Journal 37: 649–667.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, S. and Meydani, A. (2003) ‘Political Participation via the Judicial System: Exit, Voice and Quasi-Exit in Israeli Society’, Israel Studies 8(2): 118–136.Google Scholar
Narbutaité Aflaki, I., Petridou, E. and Miles, L. (eds) (2014) Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nonet, P. (1976) ‘For Jurisprudential Sociology’, Law and Society Review 10: 525–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1962) ‘The Law and Social Control’, in Evan, William M. (ed.), Law and Sociology. New York: Macmillan, 56–72.Google Scholar
Perry, Y. (1999) He Who Comes To Kill You. Tel-Aviv: Keshet Publishers [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Peters, G. and Pierre, J. (2007) The Handbook of Public Administration. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1980) ‘Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions’, American Political Science Review 74: 432–447.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. and King, P. J. (1991) ‘Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1(2): 147–175.Google Scholar
Robins, P. (2009) ‘Public Policy Making in Turkey: Faltering Attempts to Generate a National Drugs Policy’, Policy & Politics 37(2): 289–306.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R. H. (1969) ‘An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups’, Midwest Journal of Political Science 13: 1–32.Google Scholar
Schneider, M. and Teske, P. (1992) ‘Toward a Theory of the Political Entrepreneur: Evidence from Local Government’, American Political Science Review 86: 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, G. A. (1985) Political Culture and Judicial Behavior. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Segal, J .A. and Spaeth, H. J. (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, O. (2013) ‘On Accessibility and Sensitivity: Political Consumerism, Social-Political Entrepreneurship and Social Justice in Israel’, Social Security 92: 129–160 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Shamir, R. (1991) ‘Litigation as Consummatory Action: The Instrumental Paradigm Reconsidered’, Studies in Law, Politics and Society 11: 41–67.Google Scholar
Sheingate, A. D. (2003) ‘Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development’, Studies in American Political Development 17: 185–203.Google Scholar
Shelef, L. (1990) ‘The Lesser Evil and the Greater Good – On the Landau. Commission Report, Terror and Torture’, Plilim: Israel Journal of Criminal Justice 1: 185–219 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Tate, C. N. and Vallinder, T. (eds) (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2009) Building Strong Nations: Improving Governability and Public Management. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Walter, M. F. (1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yaniv, A. (1992) ‘Introduction’, in Yaniv, Avner (ed.), National Security and Democracy in Israel. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner, 1–11.Google Scholar
Zecharia, D. (2003) ‘On Torture Chambers and Acoustic Walls’, Politics 10: 61–87 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar