Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:40:45.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incongruous pedagogy: on teaching feminism, law and humour during the pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2022

Debolina Dutta
Debolina Dutta*
Affiliation:
Jindal Global Law School, India and Harvard Law School, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ddutta@jgu.edu.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the wake of the devastating second wave of the pandemic in India, I taught an elective subject called ‘A Politics of Frivolity? Feminism, Law and Humour’. I offered a subject that intellectually embraced frivolity, precisely for the purpose of responding to the serious anguish and hopelessness of the pandemic. That the study of law is serious business works as (almost) a truism. Understandably, laughter seldom goes with it. Feminists, and feminisms, have also attained a similar reputation or stereotype of being humourless and killjoys. Given this antithetical relationship that humour and laughter shared with both law and feminism, their friendship was not easily foreseeable, working to infuse their combined study with an element of surprise and incongruity. This essay offers an account of my experience of teaching the subject during these dark times. It is a reconstruction partly from my class notes and partly from scribblings and memory. I reflect on a selected set of materials that I taught in the class, how these were received, the questions they raised and how the context enlivened the materials.

Keywords

feminismjurisprudencehumourlaughtercritical pedagogysexualityviolencegenderpandemicpost-colonial
Type
Special Issue Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 18 , Special Issue 4: Contextual Legal Pedagogy , December 2022 , pp. 403 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agathocleous, T (2021) Disaffected: Emotion, Sedition, and Colonial Law in the Anglosphere. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Agnes, F (1992) Protecting women against violence: review of a decade of legislation, 1980–89. Economic and Political Weekly 17, 19–33.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S (2017) Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Antaki, M (2017) Making sense of minor jurisprudence. Law Text Culture 21, 54–75.Google Scholar
Apoorvanand (2021) Disha Ravi's brave statements in court should challenge India's judicial conscience. The Wire. Available at: https://thewire.in/rights/disha-ravi-brave-statements-court-challenge-india-judicial-conscience (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Baxi, U (1990) Teaching as provocation. In Singh, Amrik (ed.), On Being a Teacher. New Delhi: Konark Publishers, pp. 150–158.Google Scholar
Baxi, U (2014) Unlearning the law with Lotika Sarkar: Lotika Sarkar Memorial Lecture. Journal of the Campus Law Centre 2.Google Scholar
Bej, S, Sonavane, N and Bokil, A (2021) Construction(s) of female criminality: gender, caste and state violence. EPW Engage. Available at: https://www.epw.in/engage/article/constructions-female-criminality-gender-caste-and (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Bhungalia, L (2020) Laughing at power: humor, transgression, and the politics of refusal in Palestine. Environment and Planning C 38, 387–404.Google Scholar
Callard, A (2020) On anger. Boston Review Forum 13, 9–28.Google Scholar
Carroll, N (2014) Humour: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, S (2002) On Humour. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dutta, D (2016) Brushstrokes: the sound of laughter. In Plainspeak. Available at: https://www.tarshi.net/inplainspeak/brushstrokes-the-sound-of-laughter/ (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Ellis-Petersen, H (2021a) Disha Ravi: the climate activist who because the face of India's crackdown on dissent. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/18/disha-ravi-the-climate-activist-who-became-the-face-of-indias-crackdown-on-dissent (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Ellis-Petersen, H (2021b) India's Covid anguish fuels calls to release rights activists from jails. The Guardian. Available at: http://theguardian.com/world/2021/may/13/india-covid-anguish-fuels-calls-to-release-human-rights-activists-from-jails (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Gass, M et al. (2016) Play for Peace as a violence prevention model: achieving voluntad y convivencia. Journal of Experiential Education 39, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovese, A (2014) On Australian feminist tradition: three notes on conduct, inheritance, and the relations of historiography and jurisprudence. Journal of Australian Studies 38, 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, P (1996) Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodrich, P (2004) Satirical legal studies: from the legists to the ‘lizard’. Michigan Law Review 103, 397–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J and Arafa, H (2014) ‘Stuck with him’: Bassem Youssef and the Egyptian revolution's last laugh. Review of Middle East Studies 48, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, JD, III (1992) Introduction: Humor in legal education and scholarship. BYU Law Review 2, 313–323.Google Scholar
Gorris, M (1982) A Question of Silence. Quartet Films.Google Scholar
Graycar, R and Morgan, J (2002) The Hidden Gender of Law. Annadale: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Halley, J et al. (2018) Governance Feminism: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennefeld, M (2018) Comedy is a part of feminist history – and we need it more than ever. Open Democracy. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/comedy-is-part-of-feminist-history-and-we-need-it-more-than-ever/ (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Isaak, JA (1996) Feminism and Contemporary Art: The Revolutionary Power of Women's Laughter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kapur, R (2014) Gender, sovereignty and the rise of a sexual security regime in international law and postcolonial India. Melbourne Journal of International Law 14, 1–29.Google Scholar
Kotiswaran, P (2018) Governance feminism in the postcolony. In Halley, J et al. (eds), Governance Feminism: An Introduction. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 75–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S and Choudhury, S (2021) Migrant workers and human rights: a critical study on India's COVID-19 lockdown policy. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 3, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalwani, V (2021) Who is Disha Ravi, the climate activist arrested by the Delhi police? Scroll. Available at: https://scroll.in/article/986861/who-is-disha-ravi-the-climate-activist-arrested-by-delhi-police (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Leung, G (2010) The efflorescent nihilism of laughter: an existential supplement to satirical legal studies. Law and Humanities 4, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, L (2018) Guilty Pleasures: Comedy and Law in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucia, C (1997) Women on trial: the female lawyer in the Hollywood courtroom. In Fineman, MA and McClusky, MT (eds), Feminism, Media, and the Law. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 163.Google Scholar
Mondal, A (2021) The constitution of the Hathras victim's body. Body Studies 3, 42–58.Google Scholar
Morreall, J (ed.) (1986) The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Place, V (2018) You Had to Be There: Rape Jokes. Brooklyn: powerHouse Books.Google Scholar
Sircar, O (2020) Postcolonial liberalism's double binds. Critical Legal Thinking. Available at: https://criticallegalthinking.com/2020/06/19/postcolonial-liberalisms-double-binds/ (accessed 31 March 2022).Google Scholar
Sircar, O (2021) Violent Modernities: Cultural Lives of Law in the New India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A (2018) The aptness of anger. Journal of Political Philosophy 26, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder, Rajan R (2003) The Scandal of the State: Women, Law and Citizenship in Postcolonial India. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syama, Sundar U (2019) No Laughing Matter: The Ambedkar Cartoons 1932–1956. Delhi: Navayana.Google Scholar
van Marle, K (2007) Laughter, refusal, friendship: thoughts on a ‘jurisprudence of generosity’. Stellenbosch Law Review 18, 194.Google Scholar
Wall, IR (2019) Podcast as assessment: entanglement and affect in the law school. The Law Teacher 53, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, C, Willett, J and Sherman, YD (2012) The seriously erotic politics of feminist laughter. Politics and Comedy 79, 217–246.Google Scholar
Williams, PJ, Kaplan, C and Mitra, D (2021) Ask a feminist: Patricia Williams discusses rage and humor as an act of disobedience with Carla Kaplan and Durba Mitra. Signs 46, 1073–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar