Ahmed, M (2012) Implied compulsory mediation. Civil Justice Quarterly 31, 151–175.
Ahmed, M (2015) Bridging the gap between alternative dispute resolution and robust adverse cost orders. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 66, 71–92.
Ahmed, M (2018) Mediation: the need for a united, clear and consistent judicial voice. Civil Justice Quarterly 37, 13–19.
Ali, SF (2019) Civil mediation reform: balancing the scales of procedural and substantive justice. Civil Justice Quarterly 38, 9–31.
Briggs, M (2013) Chancery Modernisation Review, Final Report. London: Judiciary of England and Wales.
Briggs, M (2015) Civil Courts Structure Review: Interim Report. London: Judiciary of England and Wales.
Briggs, M (2016) Civil Courts Structure Review: Final Report. London: Judiciary of England and Wales.
Brooke, H (2004) The legal and policy implications of courtroom technology: the emerging English experience. William and Mary Rights Journal 12, 699–714.
Cappelletti, M et al. (1982) Access to justice: variations and continuity of a world-wide movement. The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law 46, 664–707.
Cloke, K (2008) Conflict Resolution. Santa Ana, CA: Janis Publications.
Court Service (2002) Modernising the Civil and Family Courts: Courts and Tribunals Modernisation Programme. London: Court Service.
de Girolamo, D (2016) Rhetoric and civil justice: a commentary on the promotion of mediation without conviction in England and Wales. Civil Justice Quarterly 67, 162–185.
Economides, K (1980) Small claims and procedural justice. British Journal of Law and Society 7, 111–121.
Fiss, O (1984) Against settlement. Yale Law Journal 93, 1073–1090.
Genn, H (2008) Judging civil justice. Hamlyn Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Genn, H (2012) What is civil justice for? Reform, ADR and access to Justice. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 24, 397–417.
Hagan, MD (2018) A human-centred design approach to access to justice: generating new prototypes and hypotheses for intervention to make courts user-friendly. Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality 6, 199–239.
Hart, HLA (1958) Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review 71, 593–629.
House of Commons Justice Committee (2019) Court and Tribunal Reforms, 2nd Report of Session 2019, HC190. London: HMSO.
Howarth, D (2014) Law as Engineering. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Jackson, R (2009) Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report. London: The Stationery Office.
Jackson, R (2010) Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report. London: The Stationery Office.
Katsh, K and Rabinovich-Einy, O (2017) Digital Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Legatt, A (2001) Tribunals for Users: One System One Service. Report of the Review of Tribunals. London: HMSO.
Lord Chancellor et al. (2016) Transforming Our Justice System: Joint Vision Statement. Cm9391. London: HMSO.
Menkel-Meadows, C (1996) The trouble with the adversary system in a postmodern, multicultural world. William & Mary Law Review 38, 5–44.
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2012) Solving Disputes in the County Courts: Creating a Simpler Quicker and More Proportionate System. Cm 8274. London: HMSO.
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2017) Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012: Post-Legislative Memorandum. Cm 9486. London: HMSO.
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2019b) Legal Support: The Way Ahead. CP 40. London: HMSO.
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2019c) Post-Implementation Review of Part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO). CP37. London: HMSO.
National, Audit Office (2018) HMCTS: Early Progress in Transforming Courts and Tribunals. Session 2017–19. HC101. London: HMSO.
Prince, S (2007) Mediating small claims: are we on the right track? Civil Justice Quarterly 26, 328–340.
Prince, S (2019) Fine words butter no parsnips: can the principle of open justice survive the introduction of the online court? Civil Justice Quarterly 38, 111–125.
Quek, D (2010) Mandatory mediation: an oxymoron? Examining the feasibility of implementing a court-based mediation programme. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 11, 479–509.
Rabinovich-Einy, O and Katsh, E (2014) Digital justice: reshaping boundaries in an online dispute resolution environment. International Journal of Dispute Resolution 1, 5–36.
Roberge, J (2019) Justicial judging: towards a renewal in problem-solving access to justice. Civil Justice Quarterly 38, 32–43.
Salter, S (2017) Online dispute resolution and justice system integration: British Columbia's Civil Resolution Tribunal. Windsor Year Book of Access to Justice 34, 112–129.
Salter, S and Thompson, D (2016–2017) Public-centred civil justice redesign: a case study of the British Columbian Civil Justice Tribunal. McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 3, 113–153.
Sanders, F (1976) Varieties of dispute resolution. Federal Rules Decisions 70, 130–131.
Smith, M et al. (2013) Bridging the empirical gap: new insights into the experience of multiple legal problems and advice seeking. Journal of Empirical Studies 10, 146–170.
Sorabji, J (2012) The road to new street station: fact, fiction and the overriding objective. European Business Law Review 1, 1–77.
Susskind, R (2019) Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tyler, TR (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice 30, 283–357.
Van, Loo R (2016) The Corporation as courthouse. Yale J on Regulation 33, 547–602.
Woolf, H (1995) Access to Justice Interim Report. London: HMSO.
Woolf, H (1996) Access to Justice Final Report. London: HMSO.