Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5bf98f6d76-fsmsh Total loading time: 0.442 Render date: 2021-04-22T00:11:33.569Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2014

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

I Law in context: past, present and future

In 2014, the International Journal of Law in Context (IJLC) celebrates its tenth anniversary. In this Editorial, we look back briefly at the first decade and, as new Editors-in-Chief, we present our ambitions for the Journal for the next decade (and beyond). The IJLC is the companion journal to the Law in Context book series, which was founded in the early 1970s. As William Twining recalls in a paper about the genesis of the series, their aim was ‘to challenge the existing textbook orthodoxy’.Footnote 1 Rather than the typical ‘black letter’ law books, in which law is studied ‘in isolation’, the aim was to promote a more ‘contextual approach’ to law. ‘Context’ has many different meanings. In one case, it may include ‘the practices and expectations of the people most directly affected by the rules under consideration’. In another case, paying more attention to ‘context’ refers to the idea that ‘light may be thrown on particular problems by the techniques and findings of other disciplines’. And, finally, ‘context’ may also include ‘the consideration of policies underlying the rules’.Footnote 2 In short, the principal objective of the founders of the Law in Context series was to move from narrow ‘statements of law’ to broader ‘statements about law’. According to one of us (David), ‘building on the heritage of the American Legal Realists, this series successfully set out to transform law teaching in the UK’.Footnote 3 David also observes that, over the past decades, numerous other books and essays about law, especially those published in other common law countries such as the US, Canada and Australia, have some reference to context in their titles. These publications demonstrate that law can be placed in ‘a variety of linguistic, literary, ideological, social, psychological, political, cultural, and material contexts’,Footnote 4 and that law often rests on important underlying assumptions. According to Twining, ‘[a] characteristic of the contextual approach is that these assumptions are articulated, examined, and subjected to critical scrutiny’.Footnote 5 For us, as editors, the contextual approach is more than a well-established research tradition, but also an exciting challenge for future research on law and society. Following the philosophy of the Law in Context book series, our mission is to establish the IJLC as ‘a global forum for interdisciplinary legal research’, capturing the best of socio-legal research and critical thinking. This means that we are engaged in fulfilling several key aims, outlined further below.

II Global

Our first ambition is to establish the IJLC as a truly global journal. One illustration of this is the new section ‘Law in other contexts’, which includes specially commissioned reports of socio-legal research in places where English is not the first language. In this way, the IJLC hopes to bring attention to work which may not be easily accessible to those without knowledge of the relevant language (and culture). In his introduction of the section, David indicated that it was also hoped that it may − eventually – ‘make some contribution to putting into question the Anglo-American hegemony over how this academic field is constituted, which questions are considered important to ask, and which methods are thought appropriate for studying them’.Footnote 6 This global ambition is not limited to this new section, but applies to the whole journal. We invite papers from all parts of the world, from Europe and North America but also from Africa, Asia and South America, which are usually less visible in international law journals.

III Forum

Our second ambition is to develop the IJLC into an open forum for innovative research and academic debate. The founders of the Law in Context book series chose the word ‘contextual’ deliberately for its open-endedness. According to Twining, law in context ‘is neither a distinctive theory of or about law, nor an academic orthodoxy’.Footnote 7 While much contemporary research is compartimentalised in many different disciplines, and most other law journals are highly specialised with a narrow focus on a particular (sub)field of law, the IJLC seeks to accommodate papers from ‘a variety of standpoints, ideologies, perspectives, and methods’.Footnote 8

IV Interdisciplinary research

Our third ambition is to publish groundbreaking critical interdisciplinary research. As indicated earlier, part of the contextual approach to law is to explore the techniques and findings from other disciplines. The IJLC aims to publish papers about law and its relationship with other disciplines including, but not limited to, science, literature, humanities, philosophy, sociology, psychology, ethics and geography. Both in Europe and in the US there is a growing interest in the role of methodology in legal scholarship.Footnote 9 While some authors are critical about traditional doctrinal research and argue for more interdisciplinary research, others question whether legal research is not drifting away from legal practice. The IJLC welcomes papers that contribute to this important methodological debate. Unlike other law journals that specialise in quantitative or qualitative methods, the IJLC promotes the idea of ‘methodological pluralism’. We agree with Twining that ‘there is plenty of scope within “the contextual approach” for differences of method, for disagreement, and for experiment’.Footnote 10

V Opportunities for young scholars

In recognition of the difficult climate of contemporary academia (research exercises, corporate takeovers, managerialism, funding crises, etc.), our fourth objective is to offer opportunities to new and young scholars. We will provide constructive feedback and advice on papers submitted to the IJLC by such scholars and aim to prioritise the publication of their work. This commitment is also a response to what Hazel Genn, Michael Partington and Sally Wheeler identify as a serious lack of capacity amongst academics to carry out empirical research.Footnote 11 Taking into account that the bulk of empirical research is carried out by ‘mature’ (i.e. reaching retirement) academics, this has the potential to develop into a crisis. We recognise that the reviewing process is (ideally) capable of being a positive source of information, guidance and sharing of expertise, often across generations of scholars (and across jurisdictional boundaries), and we aim to ensure that peer review for the IJLC is carried out with this in mind.

VI A tribute

As new editors we would like to take this opportunity to pay great tribute to the founder of the IJLC, Professor Michael Freeman, and his co-editor Carrie Menkel-Meadow. The IJLC very much reflects the breadth and depth of Michael's formidable intellect, his constant searching for new ways of understanding law and legal process, and his talent for making important connections and foregrounding context. A review of the most downloaded papers of the Journal over the past ten years reads like a record of Michael's projects and interests (and which have clearly found a grateful audience in academics developing their own work in these areas): mental health and incapacity,Footnote 12 analytical jurisprudence,Footnote 13 justice,Footnote 14 human rights,Footnote 15 courtroom evidence,Footnote 16 racism,Footnote 17 homophobia and bullying,Footnote 18 corporate responsibilityFootnote 19 and marriage in its various forms.Footnote 20 Even this very partial review of the rich diversity of papers published in the IJLC over the past ten years gives us a clear picture of Michael's conception of ‘law in context’. An important refrain is how legal institutions depend upon underlying realities of class and power, most often determined by race and gender, and exercised in a range of contexts – the family, the workplace, the village, the city, sport, hospitals, schools. It further becomes clear that during his editorship Michael has been gloriously alert to controversy (often flagging up soon-to-be highly controversial issues), and tracking their entry into political and legal processes and, as Selznick identifies, ‘even into the streets’.Footnote 21 We have all in the course of our careers benefited from Michael's generous and irrepressible spirit, and his idea of an academic ideal – relevant, frequently irreverent, linked up, searching, campaigning and radical.

Michael's co-editor, Carrie Menkel-Meadow, played a key role in exposing the Journal to a North American audience and authorship. She is regarded as one of the most innovative legal scholars in the US and elsewhere. A pioneer in several fields of legal inquiry, ranging from alternative dispute resolution, legal ethics, and feminist jurisprudence, to clinical legal education, Carrie has explored with vigour the possibilities of law, legal processes and legalism. A foremost interdisciplinary, international and comparative legal scholar, she has brought exciting insights to her empirical work on several continents and in several legal settings. For her pioneering and breaking research and scholarship, she has received several awards, including the first-ever Award for Outstanding Scholarly Work from the American Bar Association's Dispute Resolution section, who lauded her as a ‘tireless, prolific and influential researcher and writer’ who put forth the transformative idea of lawyer as problem solver twenty-five years ago. On three occasions she has been the recipient of the Center for Public Resources' First Prize for Scholarship in Alternative Dispute Resolution.

We aim to uphold both Michael's and Carrie's remarkably good work on this Journal and to be faithful to their founding ideas for it. Needless to say, as Editors-in-Chief we can only achieve these objectives with the help from the Journal's Reviews Editor, Helen Reece, and the members of our International Editorial Board, Cambridge University Press and – most importantly – the authors, readers and reviewers. Finally, the best illustration of our ambitions and objectives are the papers in this first issue of 2014.


1 Twining, William, ‘Reflections on “Law in Context”’ in Twining, William, Law in Context: Enlarging a Discipline (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 36.

2 Ibid., at 44.


3 Nelken, David, ‘Introduction’, in Nelken, David, Beyond the Law in Context: Developing a Sociological Understanding of Law (London: Ashgate, 2009)Google Scholar at xii.

4 Ibid., at xvi.


5 Twining, supra note 1 at 44.

6 Nelken, David, ‘Law in Other Contexts: A New Initiative for the Journal’ (2012) 8 International Journal of Law in ContextCrossRefGoogle Scholar 133.

7 Twining, supra note 1 at 62.

8 Ibid.


9 See, e.g., Van Gestel, Rob, Micklitz, Hans-W. and Maduro, Miguel Poiares, Methodology in the New Legal World (EUI Working Papers) (Florence: European University Institute, 2012)Google Scholar; Van Klink, Bart and Taekema, Sanne (eds), Law and Method: Interdisciplinary Research into Law (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011).Google Scholar

10 Twining, supra note 1 at 44.

11 Law in the Real World: Improving Our Understanding of How Law Works (London: Nuffield Foundation, 2006).Google Scholar

12 Craigie, J., ‘Mental Capacity and Value Neutrality’ (2013) 9(1) IJLC 1.Google Scholar

13 Twining, W., ‘Have Concepts Will Travel: Analytical Jurisprudence in a Global Context’ (2005) 1(1) IJLC 5.Google Scholar

14 Arjona, C. et al. , ‘Senses of Sen: Reflections on Amartya Sen's Ideas of Justice’ (2012) 8(1) IJLC 155.Google Scholar

15 Cabrera, O. and Gostin, L., ‘Human Rights and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Mutually Reinforcing Systems’ (2011) 7(3) IJLC 285.Google Scholar

16 Feigenson, N., ‘Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI’ (2006) 3(2) IJLC 233.Google Scholar

17 Herman, D., ‘Hopeless Causes: Race, Racism and the ‘Vexatious Litigant’ (2012) 8(1) IJLC 27.Google Scholar

18 Monk, D., ‘Homophobic Bullying in Schools: the Politics of Progress’ (2011) 7(2) IJLC 181.Google Scholar

19 Buhmann, K., ‘Integrating Human Rights in Emerging Regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: The EU Cases’ (2011) 7(2) IJLC 139.Google Scholar

20 Campbell, A., ‘Bountiful's Plural Marriages’ (2010) 6(4) IJLCGoogle Scholar 343; Grossi, R., ‘The Meaning of Love in the Debate for the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage in Australia’ (2012) 8(4) IJLC 487.Google Scholar

21 Selznick, P., ‘Law in Context Revisited’ (2003) 30 Journal of Law and Society 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 179.

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 44
Total number of PDF views: 76 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *