Skip to main content Accessibility help

Civil disobedience and constituent power

  • Richard Nobles and David Schiff (a1)


This paper uses the example of civil disobedience to explore Luhmann's description of the constitution as structural coupling between law and politics. Civil disobedience highlights the paradox of constituent and constituted power. The claims made for constituent power provide a basis for challenging the current configuration and expression of constituted power. This paradox is first avoided in the legal system through that system's inability to recognise a legal right to disobey law. In turn, a political system that has, under conditions of modernity, increasingly second coded power as legality, has an ever decreasing capacity to include communications that acknowledge a right to disobey law. Civil disobedience is only able to operate within the political system in the form of protest, and is accommodated through the exercise of discretionary powers. However, juridification of those powers has the capacity to threaten this accommodation.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Agamben, Giorgio (2005) State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Amstutz, Marc (2009) ‘The Constitution of Contractual Networks’, in Amstutz, Marc and Teubner, Gunther (eds), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 309346.
Arendt, Hannah (1973) ‘Civil Disobedience’, in Crises of the Republic. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 49–102.
Brownlee, Kimberley (2012) Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christodoulidis, Emilios (1998) Law and Reflexive Politics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
DOBNER, Petra and Loughlin, Martin (eds) (2010) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
Dworkin, Ronald (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dyzenhaus, David (1997) Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Herman Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Griffith, John (1979) ‘The Political Constitution’, The Modern Law Review 42: 121.
Herstein, Ori (2012) ‘Defending the Right to Do Wrong’, Law and Philosophy 31: 343365.
Herstein, Ori (2014) ‘A Legal Right to Do a Legal Wrong’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34: 2146.
Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard (eds) (2002) Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kelsen, Hans (2013) The Essence and Value of Democracy, trans. Graf, B., ed. Urbinati, N. and Accetti, C.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
King, Michael and Thornhill, Chris (2005) Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Politics and Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lindahl, Hans (2007) ‘Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood’, in Loughlin and Walker (2007), 9–24.
Loizidou, Elena (ed.) (2013) Disobedience: Concept and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds) (2007) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (1982) Protest: Systemtheorie und Soziale Bewegungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, Niklas (1988) ‘The Third Question: The Creative Use of Paradoxes in Law and Legal History’, Journal of Law and Society 15: 153165.
Luhmann, Niklas (1989) Ecological Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (1990) Political Theory in the Welfare State, trans. Bednarz, J. Jr.Berlin: de Gruyter.
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System, trans. Ziegert, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (2012) Theory of Society, Vol. 1, trans. Barrett, Rhodes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (2013a) Introduction to Systems Theory, trans. Gilgen, P.. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (2013b) Theory of Society, Vol. 2, trans. Barrett, Rhodes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mac Amhlaigh, Cormac (2013) ‘Constitutionalism as Paradigm: A Prospectus for Political Legitimacy in the New World Order’. Paper presented at International Network on Transnational Legal and Political Theory, Queen Mary University, London, 7 November 2013 (on file with author).
Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (2006) A Sociology of Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (2009) ‘Why Do Judges Talk the Way They Do?’, International Journal of Law in Context 5: 2549.
Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (2013) Observing Law through Systems Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Perez, Oren (2006) ‘Law in the Air: A Prologue to the World of Legal Paradoxes’, in Perez, Oren and Teubner, Gunther (eds), Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in the Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 338.
Přibáň, Jiří (2007) Legal Symbolism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Přibáň, Jiří (2011) ‘Self-reference of the Constitutional State: A Systems Theory Interpretation of the Kelsen–Schmitt Debate’, Jurisprudence 2: 309328.
Quint, Peter (2008) Civil Disobedience and the German Courts: The Pershing Missile Protests in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Rawls, John (1973) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, Joseph (2009) The Authority of Law, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Adam and Garton Ash, Timothy (2009) (eds) Civil Resistance and Power Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sarat, Austin (2014) ‘Keeping Civility in its Place: Dissent, Injustice and the Lessons of History’, in Nobles, R. and Schiff, D. (eds), Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell. Aldershot: Ashgate, 293308.
Schmitt, Carl (2006) The Concept of the Political, trans. by Schwab, G.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Teubner, Gunther (2012) Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thornhill, Chris (2011) A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verschraegen, Gert (2002) ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’, Journal of Law and Society 29: 258281.
Vinx, Lars (2007) Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed