Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T01:46:20.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

World Heritage Regionalism: UNESCO from Europe to Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2015

Lynn Meskell*
Affiliation:
Stanford University. Email: lmeskell@stanford.edu (corresponding author), cliuzza@standford.edu
Claudia Liuzza
Affiliation:
Stanford University. Email: lmeskell@stanford.edu (corresponding author), cliuzza@standford.edu
Nicholas Brown
Affiliation:
Yale University. Email: nicholas.e.brown@yale.edu

Abstract:

UNESCO World Heritage regions are historically constructed categories that do not easily map onto global geographies, yet they still continue to have important political and ethical implications in the international arena. Since their inception, regional categories have been at the heart of debates over global representation and equity in the World Heritage Committee. We include the recent controversy over uneven regional representation in elections to the Committee and the measures adopted to remedy this for the future. Specifically, the “Europe and North America” regional group has historically been the most dominant region and, as we demonstrate, continues to be so despite measures such as the Global Strategy. In the last decade, however, the “Asia and the Pacific” regional group has exhibited a growing presence in many aspects of World Heritage. We go on to examine overall trends from annual sessions of the World Heritage Committee from its start in 1977 to 2014 in terms of site inscription on the World Heritage List, membership on the Committee and size of national delegations in order to look in greater detail at the rising profile of Asia. This leads to a discussion of the different forms and understandings of regionalism, whether for Europe or Asia, and how some Asian delegations see their increased role and visibility in World Heritage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allais, L. 2013. “Integrities: The Salvage of Abu Simbel.” Grey Room 50: 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S. D., and Daws, S.. 1995. The United Nations: A Concise Political Guide. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandarin, F. 2007. World Heritage: Challenges for the Millennium. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Beeson, M. 2005. “Rethinking Regionalism: Europe and East Asia in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, no. 6: 969–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, M., and Stubbs, R.. 2012. “Introduction.” In Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, edited by Beeson, M. and Stubbs, R., 17. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertacchini, E., and Saccone, D.. 2012. “Toward a Political Economy of World Heritage.” Journal of Cultural Economics 36, no. 4: 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchfield, L., and Browne, M.. 2013. “The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42999.pdf (accessed 13 October 2015).Google Scholar
Cassel, S. H., and Pashkevich, A.. 2013. “World Heritage and Tourism Innovation: Institutional Frameworks and Local Adaptation.” European Planning Studies 22, no. 8: 1625–40.Google Scholar
Ching, L. 2000. “Globalizing the Regional, Regionalizing the Global: Mass Culture and Asianism in the Age of Late Capital.” Public Culture 12, no. 1: 233–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choay, F. 2001. The Invention of the Historic Monument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claudi, I. B. 2011. “The New Kids on the Block: Brics in the World Heritage Committee.” MA Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Conil-Lacoste, M. 1994. The Story of a Grand Design: UNESCO 1946–1993. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Dent, C. M. 2008. East Asian Regionalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droit, R.-P. 2005. Humanity in the Making: Overview of the Intellectual History of UNESCO 1945–2005. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Dutt, S. 1995. The Politicization of the United Nations Specialized Agencies: A Case Study of Unesco. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Duxbury, A. 2011. The Participation of States in International Organisations: The Role of Human Rights and Democracy. Vol. 71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falser, M. 2015a. “Epilogue: Clearing the Path towards Civilization: 150 Years of ‘Saving Angkor.’” In Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission, edited by Falser, M., 279346. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falser, M. 2015b. “Representing Heritage without Territory: The Khmer Rouge at the UNESCO in Paris During the 1980s and Their Political Strategy for Angkor.” In Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission, edited by Falser, M., 225–49. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdinand, P. 2012. “Rising Powers at the UN: An Analysis of the Voting Behaviour of BRICSAM States in the General Assembly, 1974–2008.” Paper presented at “Rising Powers and the Future of Global Governance,” 16–17 May, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Forteau, M. 2008. “International Organization or Institutions, Regional Groups.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by Wolfrum, R., 55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoggart, R. 2011. An Idea and Its Servants: UNESCO from Within. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hudson, B. 2008. “Restoration and Reconstruction of Monuments at Bagan (Pagan), Myanmar (Burma), 1995–2008.” World Archaeology 40, no. 4: 553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Källén, A. 2014. “The Invisible Archaeologist: Letters from the UNESCO Secretariat 1946–1947.” Journal of Social Archaeology 14, no. 3: 383405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labadi, S. 2005. “A Review of the Global Strategy for a Balanced, Representative and Credible World Heritage List 1994–2004.” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 7, no. 2: 89102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labadi, S. 2007. “Representations of the Nation and Cultural Diversity in Discourses on World Heritage.” Journal of Social Archaeology 7, no. 2: 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labadi, S. 2014. “The Upstream Process: The Way Forward for the World Heritage Convention?Heritage & Society 7, no. 1: 5758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L. M. 2013. “UNESCO’s World Heritage Convention at 40: Challenging the Economic and Political Order of International Heritage Conservation.” Current Anthropology 54, no. 4: 483–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L. M. 2014. “States of Conservation: Protection, Politics and Pacting within UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee.” Anthropological Quarterly 87, no. 1: 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L. M., Liuzza, C., Bertacchini, E., and Saccone, D.. 2015. “Multilateralism and UNESCO World Heritage: Decision-Making, States Parties and Political Processes.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21, no. 5: 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, K. 2011. “World Heritage Making in Angkor. Global, Regional, National and Local Actors, Interplays and Implications.” In World Heritage Angkor and Beyond Circumstances and Implications of UNESCO Listings in Cambodia, edited by Hauser-Schäublin, B., 933. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, K. 2015. “Discourses and Practices between Traditions and World Heritage Making in Angkor after 1990.” In Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission, edited by Falser, M., 251–77. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nafziger, J. A. 1975. “UNESCO-Centered Management of International Conflict over Cultural Property.” The Hastings Law Journal 27: 1051.Google Scholar
Nye, J. 1971. Peace in Parts. Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. 2001. Building Better Global Economic Brics. New York: The Goldman Sachs Group.Google Scholar
Pouliot, V. 2011. “Diplomats as Permanent Representatives: The Practical Logics of the Multilateral Pecking Order.” International Journal 66, no. 3: 543–61.Google Scholar
Reyes, V. 2014. “The Production of Cultural and Natural Wealth: An Examination of World Heritage Sites.” Poetics 44: 4263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sané, P. 2006. “Introduction.” In What UNESCO for the Future?, coordinated by Sané, P., 716. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Schermers, H. G., and Blokker, N. M.. 2011. International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2011. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Creating Norms for a Complex World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stott, P. 2011. “The World Heritage Convention and the National Park Service, 1962–1972.” George Wright Forum 28, no. 3: 279–90.Google Scholar
Stuenkel, O. 2013. “Brazil, South American Regionalism and Re-Defining the ‘Atlantic Space’.” In Laying the BRICs of a New Global Order: From Yekaterinburg 2009 to Ethekwini 2013, edited by Kornegay, F. A. and Bohler-Muller, N., 327–45. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.Google Scholar
Terrill, G. 2014. “‘Surprise!’ Is Not Good System Design: The Upstream Process for Nominations to the World Heritage List.” Heritage & Society 7, no. 1: 5971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, R., and Van Langenhove, L.. 2006. “Enhancing Global Governance through Regional Integration.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organisations 12, no. 3: 233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. 1993. Safeguarding and Development of Angkor (Prepared for the Intergovernmental Conference on Angkor, Tokyo October 12−13, 1993). UNESCO: Paris.Google Scholar
Valderrama, F. 1995. A History of UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Van der Aa, B. 2005. “Preserving the Heritage of Humanity? Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing.” Unpublished PhD diss., Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.Google Scholar
Wells, C. 1987. The UN, UNESCO and the Politics of Knowledge. New York: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar