Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:04:35.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Space Density of Spiral Galaxies as function of their Luminosity, Surface Brightness and Scalesize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Roelof S. de Jong  and
Cedric Lacey
Roelof S. de Jong
Affiliation:
Univ. of Durham, Dept. of Physics, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Cedric Lacey
Affiliation:
TAC, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The local space density of galaxies as a function of their basic structural parameters -like luminosity, surface brightness and scalesize-is still poorly known. Our poor knowledge is mainly the result of strong selection biases against low surface brightness and small scalesize galaxies in any optically selected sample. We show that in order to correct for selection biases one has to obtain accurate surface photometry and distance estimates for a large (≳ 1000) sample of galaxies. We derive bivariate space density distributions in the (scalesize, surface brightness)-plane and the (luminosity, scalesize)-plane for a sample of ~1000 local Sb-Sdm spiral galaxies. We present a parameterization of these bivariate distributions, based on a Schechter type luminosity function and a log-normal scalesize distribution at a given luminosity. We show how surface brightness limits and (1+z)4 cosmological redshift dimming can influence interpretation of luminosity function determinations and deep galaxy counts.

Type
Luminosity and surface brightness distributions
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 171: The Low Surface Brightness Universe , 1999 , pp. 52 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1999

References

Byun, Y.-I. 1992, PhD. Thesis, The Australia National University Google Scholar
Dalcanton, J.J., Spergel, D.N. & Summers, F.J. 1997, ApJ, 482, 676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, R.S. 1996, A&A, 313, 45 Google Scholar
Disney, M.J. 1976, Nature, 263, 573 Google Scholar
Disney, M.J. & Phillipps, S. 1983, MNRAS, 205, 1253 Google Scholar
Ellis, R.S. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 389 Google Scholar
Fall, S.M. & Efstathiou, G. 1980, MNRAS, 193, 189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiten, J.E. 1976, ApJ, 207, 700 Google Scholar
Freeman, K.C. 1970, ApJ, 160, 811 Google Scholar
Hudson, M.J. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1991, MNRAS, 252, 219 Google Scholar
Impey, C. & Bothun, G. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 267 Google Scholar
Lacey, C., Cole, S., Baugh, C. & Frenk, C.S. 1999, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Mathewson, D.S. & Ford, V.L. 1996, ApJS, 107, 97 Google Scholar
Mathewson, D.S., Ford, V.L. & Buchorn, M. 1992, ApJS, 81, 413 Google Scholar
McGaugh, S.S., Bothun, G.D. & Schombert, J.M. 1995, AJ, 110, 573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, H.J., Mao, S. & White, S.D.M. 1998, MNRAS, 295, 319 Google Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E. 1969, ApJ, 155, 393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W.H., Schechter, P. 1974, ApJ, 187, 425 Google Scholar
Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ, 203, 297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P. & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sodré, L. & Lahav, O. 1993, MNRAS, 260, 285 Google Scholar
Tully, R.B. & Verheijen, M.A.W. 1997, ApJ, 484, 145 Google Scholar
van den Bosch, F.C. 1998, submitted to ApJ, astro-ph/9805113Google Scholar
van der Kruit, P.C. 1987, A&A, 173, 59 Google Scholar
Warren, M.S., Quinn, P.J., Salmon, J.K. & Zurek, W.H. 1992, ApJ, 399, 405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willick, J.A. et al. 1997, ApJS, 109, 333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar