Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T11:12:54.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection Effects Against Small Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

H.A. Zook
Affiliation:
NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 77058, USA
J.A. Fernández
Affiliation:
Observatorio do Valongo, U.F.R.J. Ladiera Pedro Antonio, 43, 20.080-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
E. Grün
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Postfach 10 39 80, 6900 Heidelberg, F.R.G.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are three factors that inhibit detecting small comets relative to large comets: 1. They must pass closer to the Earth than large comets to be detected. 2. The resulting higher angular velocity for nearby comets means that, at comparable apparent magnitudes, there is less time available to discover a small comet relative to a large comet. 3. Small comets physically decay and vanish faster than do large comets. With these three factors, it can be shown that if the small comet input distribution gi (Rn) in varies as , where Rn is the nuclear radius of the comet, then the observed distribution will vary as

Type
V. Relationships to Comets and Meteoroids
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985

References

Delsemme, A.H. and Miller, D.C. (1971) Physico-chemical phonomena in comets--III The continuum of Comet Burnham. Planet. Space Sci. 19, 12291257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everhart, E. (1967) Comet discoveries and observational selection. Astron. J. 72, No. 6, 716726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probstein, R.F. (1968) Dusty gasdynamics of comet heads. In: Problems of Dynamics and Continuum Mechanics, SIAM, Philadelphia, 568583.Google Scholar