Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T11:32:37.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polar Motion: A Historical Overview on the Occasion of the Centennial of the International Latitude Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Steven J. Dick
Steven J. Dick*
Affiliation:
U. S. Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20392

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study of polar motion, termed “variation of latitude” at the time of its discovery in the late 19th century by F. Küstner and S. Chandler, is of historical interest for many reasons. From a scientific viewpoint, its discovery must be seen in the context of positional astronomy, geodesy and Earth rotation studies. From an institutional viewpoint, the founding of the International Latitude Service (ILS) in 1899 represents an early case of international cooperation in astronomy, preceding the International Astronomical Union by two decades. In addition to discussing these themes in this review, we analyze in some detail the Gaithersburg (USA) station of the ILS as a case study of the early problems and promise of polar motion studies. With milliarcsecond accuracies, polar motion studies are important today not only for astronomy and geophysics, but also for practical problems like spacecraft navigation and positioning.

Type
Historical Sessions
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Albrecht, T., 1902. Anleitung zum Gebrauche des Zenitteleskops auf den Internationalen Breitendienstes (Berlin).Google Scholar
Albrecht, T., 1903. Resultate des Internationalen Breitendienstes (Berlin).Google Scholar
Archinal, B., 1993. “Summary of Photographic Zenith Tube Observations of the U. S. Naval Observatory,” manuscript, U. S. Naval Observatory Library.Google Scholar
Blaauw, A., 1994. History of the IAU (Kluwer, Dordrecht), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butowsky, H., 1989. “Gaithersburg Latitude Observatory,” Astronomy and Astrophysics National Historic Landmark Theme Study (National Park Service, Washington, D.C.), 187–208.Google Scholar
Carter, W.E. and Carter, M. S., 1995. “Seth Carlo Chandler, Jr.,” Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 66 (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
Carter, M.S. and Carter, W. E., 2000. “Seth Carlo Chandler,Jr.: The Discovery of Variation of Latitude,” This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1885. “On the Latitude of Harvard College Observatory,” Astronomische Nachrichten, 112, no. 2672, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1887. “The Almucantar: An Investigation Made at the Observatory in 1884-1885,” Annals of the Astronomical Observatory of Harvard College, 17, 1–222.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1891a. “On the Variation of Latitude,” Astronomical Journal [hereafter, AJ], 11, 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1891b. “On the Variation of Latitude,” AJ, 11, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1893. “On the Influence of Latitude-Variations Upon Astronomical Constants and Measurements,” AJ, 12, 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danjon, A., 1958. “The Contribution of the Impersonal Astrolabe to Fundamental Astronomy,” Monthly Notices of the RAS, 118, 411–431.Google Scholar
Danjon, A., 1960. “The Impersonal Astrolabe,” in Telescopes, ed. Gerard P., Kuiper and Barbara M., Middlehurst (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 115–137, vol. 1 of Stars and Stellar Systems, Kuiper, G., General Editor.Google Scholar
Ehgamberdiev, S., 2000. “Kitab as One of the Five Stations of the ILS: History and Present,” this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euler, L., 1765. Theoria motus corporum solidorum seu rigidorum (Greifswald).Google Scholar
Guinot, B., 2000. “History of the Bureau International de L’Heure,” this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A., 1888. “The Constant of Aberration,” AJ, 8, 1–5 and 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, S.W., 1977. Systems for the Determination of Polar Motion, NOAA Technical Report NOS 72 NGS 7 (U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
Höpfner, J., 1999, “On the Contribution of the Geodetic Institute Potsdam to the International Latitude Service,” Geoforschungzentrum Potsdam, Scientific Technical Report STR99/08; abridged version this volume.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H., 1952. The Earth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Küstner, F., 1888. Neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Aberrations-Constante nebst Untersuchungen über die Veränderlichkeit der Polhhe (Berlin).Google Scholar
Küstner, F., 1890. “Ueber Polhhen-Aenderungen beobachtet 1884 bis 1885 zu Berlin und Pulkowa,” Astronomische Nachrichten, 125, no. 2993, 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambeck, K., 1980. The Earth’s Variable Rotation: Geophysical Causes and Consequences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W.D., Schlesinger, F. and Brown, E. W., 1931. “The Variation of Latitude,” Bulletin of the National Research Council, 78 (Washington, D.C.), 245–277.Google Scholar
Levallois, J.J., 1980. “The History of the International Association of Geodesy,” Bulletin Géodésique, 54, 249–313.Google Scholar
Littell, F.B. and Willis, J. E., 1929. “A New Method of Determining Time,” AJ, 40, 7–9.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. D. and Luzum, B., 1996. “Path of the Mean Rotational Pole from 1899 to 1994,” Geophysical Journal Int., 125, 623–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, W. 1960a. “Latitude and Longitude, and the Secular Motion of the Pole,” in Methods and Techniques in Geophysics, ed. Runcorn, S. K. (Interscience, London), 325–361.Google Scholar
Markowitz, W., 1960b. “The Photographic Zenith Tube and the Dual-Rate Moon-Position Camera,” in Telescopes, ed. Gerard P., Kuiper and Barbara M., Middlehurst (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 88–114, vol. 1 of Stars and Stellar Systems, Kuiper, G., General Editor.Google Scholar
Markowitz, W., 1976. “Polar Motion: History and Recent Results,” Sky and Telescope, 52 (August), 99–108.Google Scholar
Melchior, P., 1961. The Future of the International Latitude Service, Bulletin Géodésique no. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, I., 1990. “125 Years of International Cooperation in Geodesy”, IAG Symposium 102 (Springer Verlag, New York), 421–432.Google Scholar
Munk, W.H. and MacDonald, G. J. F., 1960. The Rotation of the Earth: A Geophysical Discussion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Newcomb, S., 1891. “On the Periodic Variation of Latitude, and the Observations with the Washington Prime-Vertical Transit,” AJ, 11, 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterhoff, T, ed., 1957. Transactions of the IAU, vol. 9 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), 452 and 456–459.Google Scholar
Rafferty, T., 1982. “Effect of different Sources of Variation of Latitude Data on Meridian Circle Catalogues,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 50, 27–47.Google Scholar
Ross, F., 1915. Latitude Observations with Photographic Zenith Tube at Gaithersburg, MD (U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Special Publication No. 27, Washington).Google Scholar
Smith, E. and Schlesinger, F., 1901. Report of the Superintendent of the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey showing the progress of the Work from July 1, 1899 to June 30, 1900 (Washington, 1900).Google Scholar
Spencer Jones, H., 1955, Transactions of the IAU 1955 (Dublin), 446.Google Scholar
Spencer Jones, H., 1958, Transactions of the IAU 1958 (Moscow), 488.Google Scholar
Torge, W., 1993. “The International Association of Geodesy,” posted at the IAG web site http://www.gfy.ku.dk/~iag/handbook/his.htm Google Scholar
Verdun, A. and Beutler, G., 2000. “Early Observational Evidence of Polar Motion,” this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao Ming, D., 1988. “A New Research for the Secular Polar Motion in This Century,” in The Earth ‘s Rotation and Reference Frames for Geodesy and Geodynamics” Babcock, A. and Wilkins, G. A., eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht), 385–392.Google Scholar