Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:22:39.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planetary Ephemerides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Jay H. Lieske  and
E. Myles Standish
Jay H. Lieske
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany
E. Myles Standish
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the past twenty years there has been a great amount of growth in radiometric observing methods, as well as in classical optical observations. Through radar ranging and Doppler observations of the planets and spacecraft, we have been able to improve our knowledge of the location and motion of the planets by several orders of magnitude and have succeeded in planning and executing space missions which would have been difficult if not impossible to plan and to perform utilizing the classical ephemerides. We will outline the goals and methods employed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in its effort to develop improved ephemerides which accurately reflect the motions of planets in an inertial system.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 56: Reference Coordinate Systems for Earth Dynamics , August 1980 , pp. 295 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1981

References

Brouwer, D.: 1952, Astron. J. 57, 133.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L., Seidelmann, T. C., and Van Flandern, T. C: 1975, On Reference Coord. Systems, IAU Colloq. 26, Ed. Kołaczek, B., Weiffenbach, G., Warsaw.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 1368.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 13, 298.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1975, On Reference Coord. Systems, IAU Colloq. 26, Ed. Kołaczek, B., Weiffenbach, G., Warsaw.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1980, Mitteil. Astron. Gesellschaft 48, 29.Google Scholar
Fricke, W., Kopff, A.: 1963, Fourth Fundamental Catalogue (FK4), Veröff. Astr. Rechen-Inst. Heidelberg Nr. 10, 1445.Google Scholar
Herget, P.: 1953, Astr. Pap. Wash. 14.Google Scholar
Kristensen, L.: 1980, Private Communication.Google Scholar
Morrison, L. V.: 1979, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 58, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1872, Wash. Obs. for 1870, App. III.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1882, Astr. Pap. Wash. 1, Part 4.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1895, Fundamental Const, of Astr., Washington.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1898, Astr. Pap. Wash. 6.Google Scholar
Newhall, X. X.: 1980, Private Communication.Google Scholar
O’Handley, D. A., Holdridge, D. B., Melbourne, W. G., and Mulholland, J. D., 1969, JPL Development Ephemeris Number 69, JPL TR 32-1465.Google Scholar
Schubart, J.: 1980, Private Communication.Google Scholar
Schwan, H.: 1977, Veröff. Astron. Rechen-Inst. Nr. 27.Google Scholar
Standish, E.M., Keesey, M. S. W., and Newhall, X. X.: 1976, JPL Development Ephemeris Number 96, JPL TR 32-1603.Google Scholar
Stumpff, P.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 56, 13.Google Scholar
Stumpff, P.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 78, 229.Google Scholar
Stumpff, P.: 1980, Private Communication.Google Scholar
van Flandern, T.: 1980, Private Communication.Google Scholar
Williams, J. G.: 1980, Private Communication.Google Scholar