Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:33:08.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Importance of Active Image Stabilisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J.E. Noordam
J.E. Noordam*
Affiliation:
Netherlands Foundation for Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands, Royal Greenwich Observatory, Hailsham, England

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The performance of an optical telescope can be improved considerably by opening the shutter only at moments of good seeing. The resulting instantaneous highresolution images must be corrected for shift before adding them all together. The optimum aperture diameter for which this technique works well is 1 meter or less, depending on atmospheric conditions. Image stabilisation not only improves the resolution and thus the point-source sensitivity, but it is also expected to improve the performance of speckle interferometry and optical aperture synthesis. This makes its implementation on large telescopes desirable. While it is certainly possible to do this by treating a large filled aperture like a set of independent subapertures, a much more logical approach would be to build an array of 1-meter telescopes, preferably mounted in a single large frame so that it can be pointed in all directions without extensive pathlength compensation. Such a “Many Mirror Telescope” has many advantages, and is feasible because image stabilisation helps to solve the beam-combining problem.

Type
III. Atmospheric Seeing, Interferometry, Speckle, MMTs and Arrays
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 79: Very Large Telescopes, their Instrumentation and Programs , 1984 , pp. 367 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © ESO 1984

References

Thompson, L.A. and Ryerson, H.R. “An active mirror image stabilisation instrument system (ISIS) for use on Mauna Kea”. SPIE conference 444 London (1983) pp 560–568 Google Scholar
Labeyrie, A. “Attainment of diffraction-limited resolution in large telescopes by Fourier analysing speckle patterns in star images”. A+A, vol 6, (1970) pp 85–Google Scholar
Woolf, N.J. McCarthy, D.W. Angel, J.R.P. “Performance of the MMT: Image shrinking in sub-arcsec seeing at the MMT and 2.4m telescopes”. SPIE conference 332 Tucson (1982) pp 50–56 Google Scholar
Hardy, J.H. “Active Optics: Don’t build a telescope without it”. SPIE conference 332 Tucson (1982) pp 252–259 Google Scholar
Boksenberg, A. “Auxiliary Instrumentation for large telescopes”. Proc of ESO/CERN conference Geneva (1972) pp 205–Google Scholar
Fienup, J.R. “Reconstruction of an object from the modulus of its Fourier transform”. Opt.Lett. No 3 (1978) pp 27–29 Google Scholar
Knox, K.T. and Thompson, B.J. “Recovery of images from atmospherically degraded short-exposure photographs”, Ap.J. vol 193 (1974) pp 145–Google Scholar
Fried, D.L. “Probability of getting a lucky short-exposure image through turbulence”, J.Opt.Soc.Am vol 68 (1978) pp 1651–Google Scholar
Young, A.T. “Seeing, its cause and cure”, Ap.J. vol 189 (1974) pp 587 Google Scholar
Mariotti, J.M. “Experimental results on atmospheric turbulence obtained with an infrared speckle-interferometer” Optica Acta vol 30 (1983) pp 831–Google Scholar
Greenaway, A.H. “Diffraction-limited pictures from single turbulence-degraded images in astronomy”. Optcics Comm Vol 42 No 3 (1982) pp 157–161 Google Scholar
Brown, T.M. “Reconstruction of turbulence-degraded images using non-redundant aperture arrays”. J.Opt.Soc.Am Vol 68 No 7 (1978) pp 883–889 Google Scholar
Noordam, J.E. and de Bruyn, A.G. “High dynamic range mapping of strong radio sources, with application to 3C84”. Nature Vol 299 No 5884 (1982) pp 597–600 Google Scholar