Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:05:52.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low Luminosity Galaxies in Large Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

John P. Huchra
John P. Huchra*
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-1516USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The debate about the slope and amplitude of the galaxy luminosity function at the faint end is discussed w.r.t. faint galaxies in large surveys, in particular the second CfA (CfA2) and the Las Campanas (LCRS) redshift surveys. Large surveys are necessary to determine the statistics of rare objects or objects that can only be seen out to limited volumes. Both surveys show excesses of faint galaxies over Schechter function fits, but the parent sample for the LCRS survey generally does not contain large or low surface brightness galaxies which do appear in the CfA2 survey. The objects that comprise the relatively large excess of faint galaxies in the CfA2 survey are shown to be primarily of low surface brightness and late morphological type and are generally emission line galaxies. Galaxy samples constructed like the LCRS will generally always be deficient in low luminosity galaxies and thus are not useful for constraining the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function.

Type
Luminosity and surface brightness distributions
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 171: The Low Surface Brightness Universe , 1999 , pp. 45 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1999

References

Abell, G. 1962, IAU Coll. #15, 213.Google Scholar
Arp, H.C. 1965, ApJL 142, 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binggeli, B., Sandage, A. & Tammann, G. 1988, ARA&A 26, 509 Google Scholar
Bromley, B., Press, W., Lin, H. & Kirshner, R. 1998, ApJ 595, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burg, R. 1987, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Techology.Google Scholar
De Lapparent, V. Geller, M. and Huchra, J. 1989, ApJ 343, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disney, M. 1976, Nature 263, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eftstathiou, G., Ellis, R. and Peterson, B. 1988, MNRAS 232, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felten, J. 1977, AJ 82, 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaidos, E. 1997, AJ 113, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubble, E. 1936, ApJ 84, 158; 84, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, E. 1950, Medd. Lund Series 2 #128.Google Scholar
Impey, C. & Bothun, G. 1997, ARAA 35, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiang, T. 1961, MNRAS 122, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraan-Korteweg, R. 1999, IAU Colloq 171, this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H., Kirshner, R., Shectman, S., Landy, S., Oemler, A., Tucker, D & Schechter, P. 1996, ApJ 464, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveday, J., Peterson, B., Efstathiou, G & Maddox, S. 1992, ApJ 390, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveday, J. 1998, preprint. (Astroph 9805255)Google Scholar
Marzke, R., Huchra, J. & Geller, M. 1994, ApJ 428, 43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzke, R., Geller, M., Huchra, J. & Corwin, H. 1994, AJ 108, 437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzke, R. & daCosta, L. 1997, AJ 113, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilson, The Uppsala General Catalogue of Galaxies, Ann. Uppsala Astron. Obs. Band 6, Ser. V:A. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Press, W. and Schechter, P. 1974, ApJ 187, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A., Tammann, G. & Yahil, A. 1979, ApJ 232, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ 203, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S., Rosenberg, J., Chester, T., Jarrett, T. & Huchra, J. 1998, in the DENIS Symposium.Google Scholar
Shectman, S., Landy, S., Oemler, A., Tucker, D. Lin, H., Kirhsner, R. & Schechter, P. 1996, ApJ 470, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentham, N. 1998, MNRAS 294, 193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmer, C. 1997, AJ 114, 898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucca, E. et al. 1997, A&A 326, 477.Google Scholar
Zwicky, 1957, Morphological Astronomy, circa p. 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar