Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:21:42.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Küstner’s Observations of 1884–85: the Turning Point in the Empirical Establishment of Polar Motion*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

P. Brosche
P. Brosche*
Affiliation:
Universitäts-Sternwarte Bonn

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since Euler in 1765 predicted the possibility of polar motion, the search for an observational confirmation went on. While some indications were found before, the proof without doubt is generally attributed to Küstner. Ironically, the aim of Küstner’s precise observations of 1884–1885 in Berlin was another one, namely an improved value of the constant of aberration. Using the Horrebow-Talcott method, he could conclude that the latitude of Berlin had decreased significantly by 02 in about one year. His findings promoted the start of international cooperation to observe the polar motion. Measurements from Honolulu in 1891 exhibited the effect in counterphase, thus omitting the last chance for a local explanation.

Type
Part 1. History of Early Polar Motion Research
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 178: Polar Motion: Historical and Scientific Problems , 2000 , pp. 101 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

Footnotes

*

Dedicated to Professor Friedrich Gondolatsch at the occasion of his 95th birthday.

References

Bessel, F.W.: 1818, “Über den Einflußvon Veränderungen des Erdkrpers auf die Polhhen,” Zeitschrift für Astronomie 5, 25–30. Also in: Bessel, Abhandlungen, vol. III (1876) 304.Google Scholar
Erman, A. (ed.), 1852, Briefwechsel zwischen Olbers, W. und Bessel, F. W., Leipzig, 2 volumes.Google Scholar
Euler, L., 1765, “Theoria motus corporum solidorum seu rigidorum” Rostock & Greifswald. As Dr. Verdun (Bern) has kindly pointed out, this textbook representation is best known, but there were preceding pertinent papers since 1751.Google Scholar
Felber, H.-J. (ed.), 1994, Briefwechsel zwischen Alexander von Humboldt und Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, especially pp. 155, 187, 209.Google Scholar
Foerster, W., 1878/80, “Zur Theorie des Durchgangsinstrumentes,” two parts, Astron. Jahrbuch für das Jahr 1880 and 1882 (Berlin 1878 and 1880, ed. by Foerster, W. and Tietjen, F.), Anhang, pp. 1-36 and pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Foerster, W., 1880, in “Bericht über die wissenschaftlichen Instrumente auf der Berliner Gewerbeausstellung im Jahre 1879” ed. Loewenherz, L., Springer, Berlin, chapter “Die astronomischen Instrumente” p. 3ff., especially 3–14 and Figs. 1,2.Google Scholar
Foerster, W., 1911, Lebenserinnerungen und Lebenshoffnungen (1832 bis 1910), Berlin.Google Scholar
Fricke, W., 1983, “Beiträge der Berliner Sternwarte zu Erkenntnissen auf dem Gebiet der klassischen Astronomie.” Astron. Nachrichten, 304, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopmann, J., 1937, Karl Friedrich Küstner (obituary). Vierteljahresschrift der Astronomischen Gesellschaft, 72, 24–34.Google Scholar
Küstner, F., 1888, “Neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Aberrations-Constante nebst Untersuchungen über die Veränderlichkeit der Polhöhe.” Beob. Ergebnisse Knigl. Sternwarte zu Berlin, Heft Nr. 3, Berlin, 59 pages.Google Scholar
Küstner, F., 1890, Astron. Nachrichten, 125, 273.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., 1980, The Earth’s Variable Rotation: Geophysical Causes and Consequences. Cambridge, p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenau, B.A., 1810, Monatliche Correspondenz, 22, 214f.Google Scholar
Lindenau, B.A., 1818, Correspondance astronomique, 1, 130.Google Scholar
Markowitz, W., 1976, “Polar Motion: History and Recent Results.” Sky & Telescope, 99–108.Google Scholar
Nobile, A., 1885, Ricerche numeriche sulla latitudine del R. Osservatorio di Capodimonte I, Napoli, p. 132.Google Scholar
Przybyllok, E., 1914, Polhöhen-Schwankungen. Sammlung Vieweg, Heft 11, Braunschweig, 41 pages.Google Scholar
Sandig, H.-U., 1977, “Friedrich Küstner als Observator an der Berliner Sternwarte.” Aus: “Sternzeiten” (ed. Jackisch, G.) Vol. 2., Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, p. 41–48.Google Scholar
Ševarlic, B.M., 1957 “Sur le problème de la variation des latitudes et du mouvement du pôle instantané de rotation á la surface de la terre.” Publ. Obs. Astr. Beograd, No. 5, especially p. 18ff.Google Scholar
Wirtz, C., 1898, Verff. Kgl. Sternwarte zu Bonn, No. 3.Google Scholar