Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:21:45.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Errors in Pole Coordinate Obtained by the Doppler Satellite Positionings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

S. Takagi
S. Takagi*
Affiliation:
International Latitude Observatory of Mizusawa, Japan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The pole coordinate obtained by the Doppler observation of Earth satellite shows good results, but there are some important difference from those of the astronomical observation, for example, that of the IPMS.

The Doppler observation of the Navy Navigation satellite has proved to be precise enough to supersede the astronomical observation in the geodynamics. (Anderle, 1965, 1966, 1970, 1971a, 1971b, 1971c, 1974). Yumi et al. (1979) showed that the local terms in the astronomical observation was not found in the Doppler latitude obtained at Mizusawa. This shows the superiority of the Doppler observation to the astronomical one.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 56: Reference Coordinate Systems for Earth Dynamics , August 1980 , pp. 229 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1981

References

Anderle, R. J., 1965 J. Geophy. Res., 70, 2453–2458.Google Scholar
Anderle, R. J., 1966, in The Use of Artificial Satellite for Geodesy 2, Veis, G., editor, National Technical University, Athens.Google Scholar
Anderle, R. J., 1970, NWL - Technical Report, TR-2432.Google Scholar
Anderle, R. J., 1971a, NWL - Technical Report, TR-2508.Google Scholar
Anderle, R. J., 1971b, NWL - Technical Report, TR-2559.Google Scholar
Anderle, R. J., 1971c, NWL - Technical Report, TR-2889.Google Scholar
Anderle, R. J., 1974 J. Geophys. Res., 79, 5319.Google Scholar
Beuglas, L. K., 1975, NSWC/DL - Technical Report, TR-3173.Google Scholar
Kakuta, C. et al., 1979 J. Geod. Soc. Japan, 25, 194–208.Google Scholar
Kakuta, C., 1978, in The Use of Artificial Satellite for Geodesy and Geodynamics. Veis, G. and Livieratos, E., eds., National Technical University, Athens.Google Scholar
Kozai, Y., 1975, Orbit of an Artificial Satellite. Special Publ. of NHK, Japan (Excellent summaries of his discussions on the motion of the artificial satellite and we referred to this book without notice).Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., 1971, Bull. Geod., 101, 263.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., 1973, Celes. Mech., 7, 139.Google Scholar
O’Tool, J. W., 1976, Proc. Int. Geod. Symposium, Satellite Doppler Positionings, 2 (Las Cruces, USA). DMA editor.Google Scholar
Smith, R. W. et al., 1976, Technical Report No. DMATC 76-1.Google Scholar
Takagi, S., 1974, Proc. IAU Colloquium No. 26 (Torun).Google Scholar
Takagi, S., 1975, Publ. Int. Lat. Obs. Mizusawa, 10, 53–108.Google Scholar
Takagi, S., 1977, Publ. Int. Lat. Obs. Mizusawa, 11, 5775.Google Scholar
Yumi, S. et al., 1979, Proc. Int. Geod. Symposium. Applied Research Laboratory, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar