Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:20:53.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Drift Acceleration at Interplanetary Shocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G. Erdös
Affiliation:
KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, H-1525 Budapest, POB 49, Hungary
A. Balogh
Affiliation:
Space and Atmospheric Physics Group, The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2BZ, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Scatter-free acceleration of energetic particles by quasi-perpendicular interplanetary shocks is investigated. A brief review is given on the predictions of the gradient drift acceleration model concerning the energy, time, and angular dependence of the particle flux caused by a single shock encounter interaction. The angular distribution of ions in the energy range 35 keV to 1 MeV has been determined by the low-energy ion spectrometer aboard the ISEE 3 spacecraft at several shock associated events. Reflections of particles from the shock were clearly identifiable by the loss cone in the upstream pitch angle distributions. The measurements were compared to the predictions of the gradient drift acceleration model, showing a qualitative agreement in many respects. However, bidirectional distributions observed at nearly perpendicular shocks cannot be explained in the framework of the single shock encounter mechanism. It is suggested that multiple intersections of the field lines with the surface of the shock, forming magnetic traps on the upstream side, are responsible for the observed bidirectional distributions. Results obtained from numerical test particle simulations are discussed and compared to observations. A qualitative agreement between model calculations and measurements confirms that the energetic particles are trapped and accelerated, due to special field line topology, on the upstream side of the shock. It is also argued that the collapse of the trap by the convection of the field lines through the shock is accompanied by a considerable increase of the particle flux, which may be responsible for the shock spikes.

Subject headings: acceleration of particles — interplanetary medium

Type
Interplanetary Medium
Copyright
Copyright © The American Astronomical Society 1994

References

Alekseyev, I.I., & Kropotkin, A.P. 1970, Geomagn. Aeron., 10, 755 Google Scholar
Armstrong, T.P., Krimigis, S.M., & Behannon, K.W. 1970, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 5980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, T.P., Chen, G., Sarris, E.T., & Krimigis, S.M. 1977, in Study of Traveling Interplanetary Phenomena, ed. Shea, M.A. et al. (Dordrecht: Reidel), 367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, T.P., Pesses, M.E., & Decker, R.B. 1985, in Collisionless Shocks in the Heliosphere: Reviews of Current Research, ed. Tsurutani, B. T. & Stone, R.G. (Washington, AGU:), 271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, A., & Erdös, G. 1981, Proc. 17th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., 3, 442 Google Scholar
Balogh, A., & Erdös, G. 1983, Planet. Space Sci., 31, 1389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, A., & Erdös, G. 1985, Proc. 19th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., 4, 178 Google Scholar
Balogh, A., & Erdös, G. 1991, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 15853 Google Scholar
Decker, R.B. 1983, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 9959 Google Scholar
Decker, R.B. 1987, in Proc. Int. Conf. Collisionless Shocks, Balatonfüred, Hungary, ed. Szegö, K. (Budapest: Hung. Acad. Sci., KFKI), 224 Google Scholar
Decker, R.B. 1990, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11993 Google Scholar
Decker, R.B. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, R.B., & Vlahos, L. 1986, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 13349 Google Scholar
deHoffman, F., & Teller, E. 1950, Phys. Rev., 80, 692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, L.O.’C. 1983, Rep. Progr. Phys., 46, 973 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdös, G., & Balogh, A. 1990, Planet. Space Sci., 38, 343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdös, G, & Balogh, A. 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 13253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, M.A., & Webb, G.M. 1985, in Collisionless Shocks in the Heliosphere: A Tutorial Review, ed. Stone, R.G. & Tsurutani, B.T. (Washington: AGU), 91 Google Scholar
Gisler, G., & Lemons, D. 1990, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 14925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, P.D. 1965, MNRAS, 131, 23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokipii, J.R. 1982, ApJ, 255, 716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimigis, S.M. 1987, in Proc. Int. Conf. Collisionless Shocks, Balatonfüred, Hungary, ed. Szegö, K.(Budapest: Hung. Acad. Sci., KFKI), 3 Google Scholar
Potter, D.W. 1981, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, T.R., Reinhard, R., van Nes, P., & Wenzel, K.-P. 1985, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 19 Google Scholar
Sarris, E.T., & Krimigis, S.M. 1985, ApJ, 298, 676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarris, E.T., & Van Allen, J.A. 1974, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 4157 Google Scholar
Sarris, E.T., Krimigis, S.M., & Armstrong, T.P. 1976, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, 133 Google Scholar
Singer, S., & Montgomery, M.D. 1971, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6628 Google Scholar
Terasawa, T. 1979, Planet. Space Sci., 27, 193 Google Scholar
Tidman, D.A., & Krall, N.A. 1971, Shock Waves in Collisionless Plasmas (New York: Wiley)Google Scholar
Toptyghin, I.N. 1980, Space Sci. Rev., 26, 157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, G.M., Axford, W.I., & Terasawa, T. 1983, ApJ, 270, 537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, K.-P. 1989, Adv. Space Res., 9, No. 4, 179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar