Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:38:47.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6. Thermomechanical Fracturing of Meteorites During Atmospheric Passage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Thermal attack is the basic process that dominates the atmospheric passage of a meteorite. The severity of heating by shocked air (with temperature ranging from 10,000° K to 25,000° K) depends upon pre-atmospheric velocity and angle of entry. It can produce eventually a destructive thermal stress pulse inside the body. While gross fragmentation at higher altitudes seems to have mainly a thermal origin, at lower altitudes the destruction (with occasionally its remarkable abundance of fragments) is likely to be attributed to the combined effect of high temperature and increased pressure. If it is assumed that these conditions control both the number and size distribution of fragments, then much can be learned of the comminution process by studying the fragment distribution in existing meteorite falls.

Type
Part III. Meteors and Meteoroids
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Aitchisin, J., and Brown, J. 1957, The Lognormal Distribution, University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B., and Sheaffer, Y. 1971, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 4653.Google Scholar
Bodry, L. 1973, Meteoritika, 32, 65.Google Scholar
Cheung, J., Chen, T., and Thirumalai, K. 1974, J. Appl. Mech., E41, 930.Google Scholar
Elderton, W., and Johnson, N. 1969, Systems of Frequency Curves, University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, M. 1969, Meteoritics, 4, 217.Google Scholar
Hahn, G., and Shapiro, S. 1967, Statistical Models in Engineering, J. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hurwicz, H., and Rogan, J. 1973, Ablation, in Handbook of Heat Transfer, Hartnett, J. and Rohsenow, W., editors, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Jones, J., and Kaiser, T. 1966, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 133, 411.Google Scholar
Kolmogoroff, A. 1941, C.R. Acad Sci. USSR, 31, 99.Google Scholar
Korobeinikov, V., Chushkin, P., and Shurabalov, L. 1973, Meteoritika, 32, 73.Google Scholar
Krasnov, N. 1964, Aerodynamics of the Bodies of Revolution, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Krumbein, W. 1936, J. Sediment. Petrol., 6, 35.Google Scholar
Lang, B. 1972, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 14, 245.Google Scholar
Lang, B., and Liszewska, K. 1973, Meteoritics, 8, 217.Google Scholar
Lauriello, P., and Chen, Y. 1973, J. Appl. Mech., Paper No. 73-APMW-19.Google Scholar
McCrosky, R., and Ceplecha, Z. 1970, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech., 21, 271.Google Scholar
Mitropolskij, A. 1971, Technique of Statistical Computations, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Perini, L. 1975, J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 12, 189.Google Scholar