Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:37:48.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6. CI Chondrites: Comparison and Contrast to Other Meteorite Types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The minerals of chondritic meteorites, particularly C2 and C3 are usually believed to be condensates of the (previously unfractionated) solar nebula. This implies two postulates: (1) that chemical reactions between phases ceased at various temperatures; (2) that Ni and Fe were mobilized by diffusion in the solid state. An alternate explanation is proposed, which obviates the two postulates: chondritic minerals may have condensed, in equilibrium with their own vapors, from a fraction already separated from the solar nebula at low temperature and low pressure.

Type
Part IX. The Primitive Solar Nebula
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Grossman, L., and Larimer, J. W. 1974, Revs. Geophys. Space Phys. 12, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herndon, J. M., and Suess, H. E. 1976, Geochim. Cosmochim, Acta, 40, 395.Google Scholar
Herndon, J. M., and Suess, H. E. 1977, Geochim. Cosmochim, Acta, 41, 233.Google Scholar