Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T08:10:39.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26A1/10Be in Deep Sea Spherules as Evidence of Cometary Origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G.M. Raisbeck
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Rene Bernas, C.S.N.S.M., BP N∘1, 91406 Orsay, FRANCE
F. Yiou
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Rene Bernas, C.S.N.S.M., BP N∘1, 91406 Orsay, FRANCE
J. Klein
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
R. Middleton
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A.
D. Brownlee
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, Wa 98195, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using accelerator mass spectrometry the cosmogenic isotopes 26A1 (half-life 716,000 years) and 10Be (1.5 × 106 years) have been measured in deep sea magnetic spherules. Because 26A1 can be abundantly produced by relatively low energy solar flare particles, while 10Be is mainly produced by higher energy galactic cosmic rays, the ratio 26Al/10Be of a body irradiated in space increases as the size of the body decreases. Our measured ratios of 26Al/10Be in the spherules are much larger than found in meteorites, and indicate irradiation in interplanetary space of a parent body of ≲ 1 cm diameter. Since most bodies of this size entering the atmosphere are associated with cometary orbits, our results strongly suggest that these spherules represent cometary debris. Our results also suggest an irradiation time in space of the order of 106 years for the parent bodies.

Type
III. Interplanetary Dust: Laboratory Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985

References

Brownlee, D.E., 1981, in The Sea, 7, J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Heymann, D. and Anders, E., 1967, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 31, 1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J., Middleton, R. and Tang, H.-Q., 1982, Nucl.Inst. and Meth., 193, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, R., Brinkmann, G. and Stuck, R., 1982, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 59, 33; Erratum, 64, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, R., Klein, J., Raisbeck, G.M. and Yiou, F., 1983, Nuci.Inst.and Meth., 218, 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moniot, R.K., et al., 1982, Lunar and Planet. Sci., 13, 536.Google Scholar
Murray, S. and Renard, A.F., 1891, Rept. Sci. Results Voyage H.M.S. Challenger, 3, Neill and Co., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Nishiizumi, K., 1983, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 63, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiizumi, K. and Arnold, J.R., 1982, Lunar Planet. Sci., 13, 594.Google Scholar
Nogami, K. and Yamakoshi, K., 1984, Geochem. J. (in press).Google Scholar
Parkin, D.W., Sullivan, R.L. and Bull, R.K., 1983, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 75, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisbeck, G.M., Yiou, F., Klein, J., Middleton, R., Yamakoshi, K. and Brownlee, D.E., 1983, Lunar and Planet. Sci., 14, 622.Google Scholar
Reedy, R.C., Arnold, J.R. and Lal, D., 1983, Science, 219, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reedy, R.C., 1983, Meteoritics, 18, 383.Google Scholar
Sarafin, R. et al., 1984, Nuci. Inst. and Meth., B5, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar