Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T05:20:48.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2. Meteoritic Magnetism: Implications for Parent Bodies of Origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

A. Brecher

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent progress in studying and understanding the magnetic record of meteorites is reviewed. Magnetic data are not compatible with the simple picture of a single planetary parent-body with core-mantle structure and a dynamo-generated magnetic field, as earlier envisaged by Soviet colleagues. The strong preterrestrial magnetization of iron meteorites, previously believed to have been acquired during cooling in parent-body fields of -.6 Oe, has now been shown to be probably a spontaneous moment, directionally controlled by the octahedral Ni-Fe structure. For each class of meteorites, the magnetic record is basically in accord with conclusions based on chemical-mineralogical-petrologic characteristics. For example, the complex remanence of brecciated achondrites bears no record of their primary igneous differentiation, but only of multiple brecciation events. Similarly, the unreilites show the expected magnetic imprint of shock-metamorphism at impact. Although systematic trends were found among ordinary chondrites groups, allowing for a rudimentary magnetic classification, only very few appeared to possess a primordial remanence component, which was used to estimate parent body fields in the range 0.1 = .3 oe. Most ordinary chondrites have been magnetically affected by brecciation at formation (e.g., LL), or by metamorphism within the parent body, or individually - by shock at the breakup of the parent body. Only the carbonaceous chondrites have preserved a clear magnetic record of their formation at low-temperature (T < 500° K), in strong magnetic fields (H ≥ 1 oe). The evidence is compatible with cold condensation and aggregation of component grains either in extended, enhanced solar wind fields, or in cometary magnetic fields.

Type
Part VII. Differentiated Meteorites
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 39: Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites: Interrelations, Evolution and Origins , December 1977 , pp. 415 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Alexeyeva, K. N. 1958, Meteoritika, 16, 67.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. K., and Margraves, R. B. 1972, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 17, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, A. 1971, in: Evolutionary and Physical Properties of Meteor oids Proc. IAU Coll. #13, ed. Hemenway, C. L., Millman, P. M., and Cook, A. F. (NASA SP-319), p. 311.Google Scholar
Brecher, A. 1972, in: Symposium on the Origin of the Solar System, ed. Reeves, H. (Paris, CNRS), p. 260.Google Scholar
Brecher, A., and Arrhenius, G. 1974 J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, A., and Ranganayaki, R. P. 1975, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 25, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, A., and Stein, J. 1975, abstr., EOS, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 56, 1016.Google Scholar
Brecher, A., Briggs, P. J., and Simmons, G. 1975, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 28, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, A. 1976, in: Lunar Science VII, (Lunar Science Institute, Houston), p. 91.Google Scholar
Brecher, A., and Cutrera, M. 1976, J. Geomag. Geoelec, 28, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, A., and Albright, L. 1976, to be submitted to Phys. Earth Planet. Int., and Abstracts for Fall AGU Meeting and Meteoritical Society Meeting.Google Scholar
Butler, R. F. 1972, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 17, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. R. 1976, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 40, 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, P. E., Goldstein, J. I., and Summers, A. L. 1970, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 34, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gose, W. A., and Butler, R. F. 1975, Revs. Geophys. Space Phys., 13, 189 (and bibliography, ibid., p. 226).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guskova, E. G., and Pochtarev, V. I. 1967, Geomagn. and heron., 7, 245.Google Scholar
Guskova, E. G., and Pochtarev, V. I. 1969, in: Mereorite Research, ed. Millman, P. M. (D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland), p. 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guskova, E. G. 1963, Geomagn. Aeron., 2, 626.Google Scholar
Guskova, E. G. 1965, Geomagn. Aeron., 5, 91.Google Scholar
Guskova, E. G. 1970, Meteoritika, 30, 74.Google Scholar
Guskova, E. G. 1972, Magnetic Properties of Meteorites (Nauka, Leningrad) (in russ.).Google Scholar
Herndon, J. M., Rowe, M. W., Larson, E. E., and Watson, D. E. 1972, Meteoritics, 7, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herndon, J. M., and Rowe, M. W. 1974, Meteoritics, 9, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ip, W. H., and Mendis, D. A. 1976 (in press).Google Scholar
Larson, E. E., Watson, D. E., Herndon, J. M., and Rowe, M. W. 1973, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 25, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, A. J. 1972, Nature, 237, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pochtarev, V. I. 1967, Geomagn. Aeronom., 7, 609.Google Scholar
Sonett, C. P. 1976, in this volume.Google Scholar
Stacey, F. D., Lovering, J. F., and Parry, L. G. 1961, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, F. D. 1976, in Annual Reviews Earth and Planetary Sciences, vol. 4, p. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasilewski, P. J. 1974, in: Proc. Nagata Conf. (Univ. of Pittsburgh), p. 478.Google Scholar
Wasson, J. T. 1974, Meteorites - Classification and Properties, (Springer-Verlag, N.Y., Heidelberg, Berlin).Google Scholar
Weaving, B. 1961, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 26, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. A. 1967, Icarus, 6, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar