Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:33:11.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1. The Origin of Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Empirical data are confronted with different hypotheses on the origin of comets. The hypotheses are classified into three categories: 1) Comets were condensed from the solar nebula and ejected later into the Oort’s cloud. 2) Comets were condensed in situ, more or less recently, on their present trajectories; 3) Reversing the arrow of time in the traditional evolution of comets. Only two hypotheses, both from the first category, are found to be in agreement with all empirical data. The first hypothesis explains the origin of the Oort’s cloud by the perturbations of the giant planets (mainly Uranus and Neptune and possibly Pluto) on a ring of proto-comets, during the final accretion stages of the solar system. The second hypothesis uses the fast mass loss of the solar nebula to expell an outer ring of proto-comets into elliptic trajectories. Although no empirical evidence requests that the Oort’s cloud be older than a few million years, its matter is not likely to be from a different reservoir than solar system stuff, and no satisfactory theory explains its formation more recently than 4,5 billion years ago.

Type
Part VIII. The Origin of Comets
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Alfvén, H., and Arrhenius, G. 1976, Evolution of the Solar System, NASA-SP-345, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Anders, E., Hayastu, R., and Studier, M. H. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Brownlee, D. E., Rajan, R. S., and Tomandl, D. A. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.G.W. 1972, On the Origin of the Solar System, p. 57, edit. Reeves, publ., CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.G.W. 1977, NATO’s Newcastle Meeting on The Origin of the Solar System; edit. Dermott (in press).Google Scholar
Crommelin, A. 1910, Scientia, 7.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 29, 377.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. 1975, in “Comet Kohoutek,” p. 219, NASA-SP-35S.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. 1976, Mem. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, 6 série., 9, 135.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. and Miller, D. 1971, Planet. Space Sci., 19, 1229.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. and Rud, D. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. 1972, Astrophys. Letters, 10, 131.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Everhart, E., and Raghavan, N. 1970, Astronom. J., 75, 258.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. M. 1974, Astrophys. J. Letters, 189, L81.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J, M. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Kazimirchak-Polonskaya, E. I. 1972, IAU Symposium No. 45, p. 373, publ. Reidel-Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G. P. 1951, in Astrophysics: A Topical Symposium, p. 357; edit. Hynek, publ. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Lagrange, J. L. 1814, Addendum to La Connaissance des Temps.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R. A. 1953, The Comets and Their Origin, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lyttleton, R. A. 1968, Mysteries of the Solar System, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G. 1975, Catalogue of Cometary Orbits, Smithson. Astrophys. Obs., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., and Sekanina, Z. 1973, Astron. J., 78, 1118.Google Scholar
McCrea, W. H. 1975, Nature, 255, 96 and 607.Google Scholar
Millman, P. M. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Newton, H. A. 1893, Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci., 6, 7.Google Scholar
Nezhinsky, E. M. 1972, IAU Symposium No. 45, p. 335, edit. Chebotarev, et al., publ. Reidel/Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H. 1950, Bull. Astron. Instit. Netherlands, 11, 91.Google Scholar
Öpik, E. J. 1966, Mem. Soc. Roy. Sci. Ligge, Ser. 5, 12, 523.Google Scholar
Öpik, E. J. 1975, Irish Astron. J., 12, 1.Google Scholar
Proctor, R. A. 1884, Knowledge, 6, 126.Google Scholar
Reeves, H. 1974, Nature, 248, 398.Google Scholar
Safronov, V. S. 1972, IAU Symposium No. 45, p. 329, edit. Chebotarev, et al., publ. Reidel/Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
Shimizu, M. 1976, The Study of Comets, part 2, p. 673, publ. NASA-SP-393.Google Scholar
Tisserand, F. 1890, Bull. Astron. 7, 453 (Paris).Google Scholar
Vanysek, V. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T. C. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Van Woerkom, A.J.J. 1948, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 10, 445.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatsky, S. K. 1933, Astron. Zh., 10, 8.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatsky, S. K. 1962, Astron. Vestn, 39, 290.Google Scholar
Vsekhsvyatsky, S. K. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Weidenschilling, S. J. 1975, Astron. J., 80, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1950, Astrophys. J., 111, 375.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1962, Astron. J., 67, 1.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. I. 1964, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 51, 711.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1972, in IAU Symposium No. 45, p. 401, edit. Chebotarev, et al., publ. Reidel/Dordrecht, Holland.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1975, Astron J., 80. 525.Google Scholar