Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:23:08.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1. The Evolution of Asteroids as Meteorite Parent-Bodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

C. R. Chapman

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The hypothesis that the asteroid belt is the source region for nearly all meteorite remains viable and there is no compelling reason to ascribe any meteorites to cometary origin. On the other hand, uncertainties about the true composition of the larger S type asteroids and difficulties in finding plausible main-belt source-bodies for the ordinary chondrites leave room open for further speculation on this question. The scenario for the evolution of asteroids, based on collisional models of two distinct populations of different physical properties, is being criticized and refined. It remains uncertain whether this approach will ultimately prove to be the correct interpretation of the collisional evolution of asteroids.

Type
Part V. Orbital Evolution and Fragmentation of Asteroids
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 39: Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites: Interrelations, Evolution and Origins , December 1977 , pp. 265 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

Chapman, C. R. 1974, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1, 341–344.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. R. 1976, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 40, 701–719.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. R., and Davis, D. R. 1975, Science, 190, 553–556.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. R., Morrison, D., and Zellner, B. 1975, Icarus, 25, 104–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. R., and Salisbury, J. W. 1973, Icarus, 19, 507–522.Google Scholar
Clayton, R. N., Onuma, N., and Mayeda, T. K. 1976, A Classification of Meteorites Based on Oxygen Isotopes, preprint.Google Scholar
Consolmagno, G. J., and Drake, M. J. 1977, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, submitted.Google Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Chapman, C. R. 1977, Lunar Science VII, in press.Google Scholar
Dohnanyi, J. S. 1969, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 2531–2554.Google Scholar
Gaffey, M. J. 1976, private communication.Google Scholar
Gradie, J., and Zellner, B. 1977, Science, submitted.Google Scholar
Harris, A. W. 1977, Icarus, submitted.Google Scholar
Matson, D. L., Johnson, T. V., and Veeder, G. J. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
McCord, T. B., Adams, J. B., and Johnson, T. V. 1970, Science, 168, 1445–1447.Google Scholar
McCord, T. B., and Chapman, C. R. 1975, Astrophys. J., 197, 781–790.Google Scholar
McCord, T. B., and Gaffey, M. J. 1974, Science, 186, 352–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Pieters, C., Gaffey, M. J., Chapman, C. R., and McCord, T. B. 1976, Icarus, 28, 105–115.Google Scholar
Scholl, J., and Frb’schle, C. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Veeder, G. J., et al. 1977, Astron. J., submitted.Google Scholar
Wasson, J. T. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G. W. 1977, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 40, 1247–1317.Google Scholar
Wetherill, G. W. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Zellner, B. 1975, Astrophys. J., 198, L4S-L47.Google Scholar
Zellner, B., Andersson, L., and Gradie, J. 1977, Icarus, in press.Google Scholar
Zellner, R., and Bowell, E. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar
Zellner, B., Leake, M., and Morrison, D. 1977, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, submitted.Google Scholar