Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:18:28.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II. Free Movement Of Goods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Stephen Weatherill
Affiliation:
Jean Monnet Professor of European Law, Somerville College, Oxford.

Abstract

The Commission has spent time in 2003 celebrating the tenth anniversary of the establishment of the internal market. In this context the use of deadlines is misleading. The building of an internal market is more process than event. Many significant pieces of legislation entered into force at the end of 1992, but many pre-dated that moment and others again havebeen agreed subsequently. And the Court's interpretation of relevant provisions of the Treaty was not fossilised at the end 1992, but rather its dynamic evolution continues to exert influence over the process of market-building. The Commissionsperfectly well aware of this. It admits that the Internal Market will never be ‘completed’.1 The core mission is to promote and sustain improved economic performance, not to hit crude targets. Nonetheless dissemination of propaganda possessesbase appeal in all political systems and the Commission has taken the trouble to emphasise the gainsthat have accrued from the process of integration, while also devoting attention both to remaining gaps and strategies forplugging them. In making its case the Commission is confronted by the unavoidable absence of reliable data on what would have occurred had the internal market not been pursued in the chosen manner. Sector by sector, it is difficult to demarcateadvantages accruing from the ‘1992’ initiative from those that would have occurred in any event or which are attributable to other factors such as global trade liberalisation. Moreover, the essence of the internal market programme is that benefits will be felt not only in the short term, but also in the long term, and accordingly, in line with Chairman Mao's reported refusal to assess the importance of the French Revolution on the basis that it was too soon to tell, measurement of the impact of the internal market project cannot yet be decisive. However, in its report The Internal Market—Ten Years without Frontiers the Commission insisted on demonstrably favourable macroeconomic consequences.2 It highlighted price reductions and improved productivity. Its simulation results suggest that real Gross Domestic Product would have been 1.4 per cent lower in 2002 without the internal market programme. The level of employment would have been 0.86 per cent lower. Moreover further gains are expected of the former, though not the latter, type in future.

Type
Current Developments: European Union Law
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Internal Market Scoreboard No 11, Nov 2002, available via <http://europa.eu.int /comm/internal_market/en/update/score/index.htm>..>Google Scholar

2 <http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/10years/docs/workingdoc/workingdoc_en. pdf>..>Google Scholar

3 It is currently accessible via <http://europa.eu.int/comm/internalinarket/en/update/score/index. htm>..>Google Scholar

4 See <http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/solvit>..>Google Scholar

5 Commission Communication, Better Monitoring of the Application of Community Law COM (2002) 725, 11 12 2002.Google Scholar

6 COM (2001) 428 p 25.Google Scholar

7 Egan, M, Constructing a European Market (2001), 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 (1998) OJ L204/37, itself amended by Directive 98/48 (1998) OJ L217/18.Google Scholar

9 Case C-194/94 [1996] ECR I-2201; see (1997) 46 ICLQ 704.Google Scholar

10 Communication 86/C 245/05 (OJ1986 C 245/4); the Court cited this Communication in para 36 of CIA Security.Google Scholar

11 Eg (2001) OJ C152/4.Google Scholar

12 Case C-226/97 [1998] ECR I-3711; see (1999) 48 ICLQ 217.Google Scholar

13 Case C-443/98 [2000] ECR I-7535; see (2001) 50 ICLQ 158.Google Scholar

14 Case C-159/00 [2002] ECR 5031.Google Scholar

15 For major recent explorations see Oliver, Free Movement of Goods in the European Community(2003);Google ScholarBarnard, and Scott, (eds), The Law of the Single European Market (2002);Google ScholarSnell, Goods and Services in EC Law (2002).Google Scholar

16 Joined Cases C-267/91 and C-268/91 Keck and Mithouard [1993] ECR I-6097.Google Scholar

17 Case 120/78 [1979] ECR 649.Google Scholar

18 Case C-2/90 [1992] ECR I-4431.Google Scholar

19 See eg the contributions of De Burca and of Scott to Barnard, and Scott, (eds), above n 15.Google Scholar

20 Case C-379/98 Preussen Elektra AG v Schleswag AG [2001[ ECR I-2099.Google Scholar

21 In European Environmental Law (2000), ‘Some further reflections on the scope of Arts 28–30 (30–6) E C (1998) 38 CMLRev 783 respectively.Google Scholar

22 Cf eg Case C-389/96 Aher-Waggon v Germany [1998] ECR I-4473.Google Scholar

23 Nor did it consider that the scheme fell foul of the Treaty State aid rules, though the case is controversial on this point too:see annotation by Bronckers and Van der Vlies [2001] ECLR 458.Google Scholar

24 Case C-136/00 Danner [2002[ ECR I–8147.Google Scholar

25 Case C-376/98 [2000] ECR I-8419; see (2001) 50 ICLQ 158.Google Scholar

26 Directive 98/43 (1998) OJ L213/9.Google Scholar

27 Case C-491/01 judgment of 10 Dec 2002.Google Scholar

28 Para 60.Google Scholar

29 The Court concluded that Art 133 EC should not have been used as a second legal base but it treated this as a purely formal defect giving rise to no irregularity in the adoption procedure.Google Scholar

30 OJ 1985 L372/31.Google Scholar

31 COM (2001) 398, paras 2333, 72.Google Scholar

32 COM (2003) 68.Google Scholar

33 Above n 27.Google Scholar

34 Above n 31, para 43.Google Scholar