Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Use of Medicare Claims to Identify US Hospitals with a High Rate of Surgical Site Infection after Hip Arthroplasty

  • Michael S. Calderwood (a1), Ken Kleinman (a1), Dale W. Bratzler (a2) (a3), Allen Ma (a2), Christina B. Bruce (a1), Rebecca E. Kaganov (a1), Claire Canning (a1), Richard Piatt (a1), Susan S. Huang (a4) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program and the Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality...

Abstract

Objective.

To assess the ability of Medicare claims to identify US hospitals with high rates of surgical site infection (SSI) after hip arthroplasty.

Design.

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting.

Acute care US hospitals.

Participants.

Fee-for-service Medicare patients 65 years of age and older who underwent hip arthroplasty in US hospitals from 2005 through 2007.

Methods.

Hospital rankings were derived from claims codes suggestive of SSI, adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities, while using generalized linear mixed models to account for hospital volume. Medical records were obtained for validation of infection on a random sample of patients from hospitals ranked in the best and worst deciles of performance. We then calculated the risk-adjusted odds of developing a chart-confirmed SSI after hip arthroplasty in hospitals ranked by claims into worst- versus best-performing deciles.

Results.

Among 524,892 eligible Medicare patients who underwent hip arthroplasty at 3,296 US hospitals, a patient who underwent surgery in a hospital ranked in the worst-performing decile based on claims-based evidence of SSI had 2.9-fold higher odds of developing a chart-confirmed SSI relative to a patient with the same age, sex, and comorbidities in a hospital ranked in the best-performing decile (95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.7).

Conclusions.

Medicare claims successfully distinguished between hospitals with high and low SSI rates following hip arthroplasty. These claims can identify potential outlier hospitals that merit further evaluation. This strategy can also be used to validate the completeness of public reporting of SSI.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 133 Brookline Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02115 (mcalderwood@partners.org)

References

Hide All
1. HCUPnet: a tool for identifying, tracking, and analyzing national hospital statistics. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.app/. Accessed December 22, 2011.
2. Bozic, KJ, Ries, MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(8):17461751.
3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program; final rule. Federal Register 2011;76(88):2649026547.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/. Accessed February 14, 2012.
5. Barnes, S, Salemi, C, Fithian, D, Akiyama, L, Barron, D, Hoare, K. An enhanced benchmark for prosthetic joint replacement infection rates. Am J Infect Control 2006;34(10):669672.
6. Huotari, K, Lyytikainen, O; Hospital Infection Surveillance Team. Impact of post-discharge surveillance on the rate of surgical site infection after orthopedic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27(12):13241329.
7. Yokoe, DS, Avery, TR, Huang, SS. Surgical site infection surveillance following total hip and knee arthroplasty using California administrative data. In: Program and abstracts of the 21st Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Dallas, TX: SHEA, 2011. Abstract 619.
8. Platt, R, Yokoe, DS, KE, Sands; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter In-verstigators. Automated methods for surveillance of surgical site infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7(2):212216.
9. Anderson, DJ, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Kaye, KS. Complex surgical site infections and the devilish details of risk adjustment: important implications for public reporting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(10):941946.
10. Hirschhorn, LR, Currier, JS, Platt, R. Electronic surveillance of antibiotic exposure and coded discharge diagnoses as indicators of postoperative infection and other quality assurance measures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:2128.
11. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Livingston, J, Christiansen, C, Platt, R. Efficient identification of postdischarge surgical site infections: use of automated pharmacy dispensing information, administrative data, and medical record information. J Infect Dis 1999; 179:434441.
12. Sands, KE, Yokoe, DS, Hooper, DC, et al. Detection of postoperative surgical-site infections: comparison of health plan-based surveillance with hospital-based programs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:741743.
13. Yokoe, DS, Noskin, GA, Cunnigham, SM, et al. Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among inpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:19241930.
14. Miner, AL, Sands, KE, Yokoe, DS, et al. Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among outpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:19311937.
15. Kurtz, SM, Lau, E, Schmier, J, Ong, KL, Zhao, K, Parvizi, J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(7):984991.
16. Huang, SS, Placzek, H, Livingston, J, et al. Use of Medicare claims to rank hospitals by surgical site infection (SSI) risk following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(8):775783.
17. Calderwood, MS, Ma, A, Khan, YM, et al. Use of Medicare diagnosis and procedures codes to improve detection of surgical site infections following hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and vascular surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1): 4049.
18. Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health-care associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309332.
19. The Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures (Specifications Manual), Published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Joint Commission. http://www.jointcommission.org/specifications_manual_for_national_hospital_inpatient_quality_measures/. Accessed December 22, 2011.
20. Schneeweiss, S, Seeger, JD, Maclure, M, Wang, PS, Avorn, J, Glynn, RJ. Performance of comorbidity scores to control for confounding in epidemiologic studies using claims data. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154(9):854864.
21. Schneeweiss, S, Wang, PS, Avorn, J, Glynn, RJ. Improved comorbidity adjustment for predicting mortality in Medicare populations. Health Serv Res 2003;38(4):11031120.
22. Ridgeway, S, Wilson, J, Charlet, A, Kafatos, G, Pearson, A, Coello, R. Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(6):844850.
23. Willis-Owen, CA, Konyves, A, Martin, DK. Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement: an analysis of 5277 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92(8):11281133.
24. Dale, H, Skråmm, I, Løwer, HL, et al. Infection after primary hip arthroplasty: a comparison of 3 Norwegian health registers. Acta Orthop 2011;82(6):646654.
25. Bolon, MK, Hooper, D, Stevenson, KB, et al. Improved surveillance for surgical site infections after orthopedic implantation procedures: extending applications for automated data. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:12231229.
26. Kirkland, KB, Briggs, JP, Trivette, SL, Wilkinson, WE, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20(11):725730.
27. Poulsen, KB, Wachmann, CH, Bremmelgaard, A, Sorensen, AI, Raahave, D, Petersen, JV. Survival of patients with surgical wound infection: a case-control study of common surgical interventions. Br J Surg 1995;82(2):208209.
28. Kaye, KS, Anderson, DJ, Sloane, R, et al. The effect of surgical site infection on older operative patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57(1):4654.
29. Leekha, S, Sampathkumar, P, Berry, DJ, Thompson, RL. Should national standards for reporting surgical site infections distinguish between primary and revision orthopedic surgeries? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31(5):503508.
30. State-based HAI prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/hai/stateplans/required-to-report-hai-NHSN.html/. Accessed June 18, 2012.
31. Haley, VB, Van Antwerpen, C, Tserenpuntsag, B, et al. Use of administrative data in efficient auditing of hospital-acquired surgical site infections, New York State 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(6):565571.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed