Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:30:35.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Survey of Hospital Postpartum and Postabortion Rubella Vaccination Policies in Los Angeles County, 1992

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Diana G. Garcia ,
Donnell P. Ewert  and
Laurene Mascola
Diana G. Garcia
Affiliation:
Acute Communicable Disease Control, County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, California
Donnell P. Ewert*
Affiliation:
Acute Communicable Disease Control, County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, California
Laurene Mascola
Affiliation:
Acute Communicable Disease Control, County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, California
*
Acute Communicable Disease Control, 313 N. Figueroa St., Room 231, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the proportion of Los Angeles County (LAC) hospitals offering obstetrical services that have postpartum and postabortion rubella vaccination policies.

Design:

A survey was sent to the infection control practitioners (ICPs) of all operational acute care hospitals (N = 133) in LAC in 1992. A reminder and second survey was mailed to ICPs who did not respond to the first mailing.

Results:

Of 75 hospitals with obstetrical departments, 56 (75%) responded. Thirty-four (61%) of the 56 respondent hospitals had postpartum rubella vaccination policies. Of the 34 hospitals with policies, 30 (88%) accepted only a written record of rubella seropositivity as proof of immunity, 30 (88%) screened women with unknown immunity status before hospital discharge, and 32 (94%) vaccinated susceptible women before hospital discharge. Of the 32 hospitals that performed induced abortions, only two (6%) provided screening and vaccination services for these women.

Conclusion:

Only 61% of hospitals in LAC offering obstetrical services had postpartum rubella vaccination policies while only minimal screening and vaccination occurred in association with abortion services. Widespread implementation of postabortion screening and vaccination, and more stringent compliance with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for postpartum screening and vaccination in hospitals offering obstetrical services would reduce the number of rubella-susceptible women who have been missed by other prevention strategies.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 14 , Issue 9 , September 1993 , pp. 513 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lindegren, ML, Fehrs, LJ, Hadler, SC, Hinman, AR. Update: rubella and congenital rubella syndrome, 1980-1990. Epidemiol Rev 1991;13:341–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Centers for Disease Control. Increase in rubella and congenital rubellasyndrome-United States, 19881990. MMWR 1991;40:93–99.Google Scholar
3. Lee, SH, Ewert, DP, Frederick, PD, Mascola, L. Resurgence of congenital rubella syndrome in the 1990s: report on missed opportunities and failed prevention policies among women of childbearing age. JAMA 1992;267:2616–2620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Centers for Disease Control. Rubella prevention: recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP). MMWR 1990;39(RR-15):1–18.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control. Rubella and congenital rubella syndrome-New York City. MMWR 1986;35:770-774, 779.Google Scholar
6. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 1990. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service; 1991.Google Scholar