Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:36:25.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Significance of Nosocomial Infection Rates in the Era of DRGs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Peter C. Fuchs*
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, St. Vincent Hospitaland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
Marie E. Gustafson
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, St. Vincent Hospitaland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
*
St. Vincent Hospitaland Medical Center, Portland, OR 97225

Extract

Nosocomial infection rates, as determined by either incidence or prevalence methods, are considered important data in infection control programs. Many factors besides infection control measures affect infection rates— eg, illness acuity of the patient population. However, there is evidence that when these factors remain constant, a lowering of the infection rate can be the result of infection control efforts. We wish to illustrate how a dramatic drop in infection rate may mislead infection control personnel into a false sense of accomplishment, when in reality it is an effect of changing medical practices.

Type
Special Sections
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al: The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infection in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:182205.Google Scholar
2.Wenzel, RP: Nosocomial infections, diagnosis-related groups, and study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control. Economic implications for hospitals under the prospective payment system. Am J Med 1985; 78(Suppl 6B):37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar