Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Reliability Testing for Portable Adenosine Triphosphate Bioluminometers

  • Greg S. Whiteley (a1) (a2), Chris Derry (a1) and Trevor Glasbey (a2)

Extract

Measurement of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) using portable bioluminometers has been adapted from the food manufacturing sector, and it has been suggested that it could be used as an indicator of surface soiling or cleanliness in hospital settings. Some healthcare authorities are considering the use of portable ATP bioluminometers as a tool for standard setting for surface cleanliness to improve cleaning standards. Central to this approach is the use of a commonly accepted level of detected ATP—expressed as relative light units (RLUs)—that may be used as a surrogate for underlying soiling, including the presence of pathogenic microorganisms.

It has been demonstrated that improvements can be made to cleaning processes with fluorescent markers through a simpler approach that provides a qualitative efficiency measurement of the cleaning process. Measurement of surface hygiene using ATP bioluminometers is thought to provide a more quantitative surrogate of surface cleanliness.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corporation Pty Ltd, PO Box 1076, North Sydney, New South Wales 2059, Australia (gregswhiteley@aol.com)

References

Hide All
1.Griffith, CJ, Cooper, RA, Gilmore, J, Davies, C, Lewis, M. An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:1928.
2.Wilson, F, Wells, A. Evaluating environmental cleanliness in hospital and other healthcare settings. Healthc Infect 2012;17:70.
3.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:678684.
4.Carling, PC, Parry, MM, Rupp, ME, Po, JL, Dick, B, Von Beheren, S; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Improving the environment surrounding patients in 36 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:10351041.
5.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Havill, HL, Mangione, E, Dumigan, DG, Moore, BA. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:11871193.
6.Lewis, T, Griffith, CJ, Gallo, M, Weinbren, M. A modified ATP benchmark for evaluating the cleaning of some hospital environmental surfaces. J Hosp Infect 2008;69:156163.
7.Mulvey, D, Redding, P, Robertson, C, et al.Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:2530.
8.Whiteley, GS, Derry, C, Glasbey, T. The comparative performance of three brands of portable ATP-bioluminometer intended for use in hospital infection control. Healthc Infect 2012;17:9197.
9.Aiken, ZA, Wilson, M, Pratten, J. Evaluation of ATP bioluminescence assays for potential use in a hospital setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011:32;507509.
10.Shama, G, Malik, DJ. The uses and abuses of rapid biolumines-cence-based ATP assays. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2013;216:115125.
11.Carrick, K, Barney, M, Navarro, A, Ryder, D. The comparison of four bioluminometers and their swab kits for instant hygiene monitoring and detection of microorganisms in the brewery. J Inst Brew 2001;107:3137.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed