Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:36:25.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Raising the Bar: The Need for Standardizing the Use of “Standard Precautions” as a Primary Intervention to Prevent Occupational Exposures to Bloodborne Pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

David K. Henderson*
Affiliation:
Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
*
National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 2C146, 9000 Rockville Pk, Bethesda, MD 20892
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

References

1. Department of Labor. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; final rule. Federal Register 1991;56:64175–182.Google Scholar
2. Henderson, DK. HIV postexposure prophylaxis in the 21st century. Emerg Infect Dis. In press.Google Scholar
3. Henderson, DK. Postexposure chemoprophylaxis for occupational exposures to the human immunodeficiency virus. JAMA 1999;281:931936.Google Scholar
4. Fahey, BJ, Koziol, DE, Banks, SM, Henderson, DK. Frequency of nonparenteral occupational exposures to blood and body fluids before and after Universal Precautions training. Am J Med 1991;90:145153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Haiduven, DJ, DeMaio, TM, Stevens, DA. A five-year study of needlestick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:265271.Google Scholar
6. Beekmann, SE, Vlahov, D, Koziol, DE, McShalley, ED, Schmitt, JM, Henderson, DK. Temporal association between implementation of Universal Precautions and a sustained, progressive decrease in percutaneous exposures to blood. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:562569.Google Scholar
7. Beekmann, SE, Vaughn, TE, McCoy, KD, Ferguson, KJ, Torner, JC, Woolson, RF, et al. Hospital bloodborne pathogens programs: program characteristics and blood and body fluid exposure rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:7382.Google Scholar
8. Ben-David, B, Gaitini, L. The routine wearing of gloves: impact on the frequency of needlestick and percutaneous injury and on surface contamination in the operating room. Anesth Analg 1996;83:623628.Google Scholar
9. Courington, KR, Patterson, SL, Howard, RJ. Universal precautions are not universally followed. Arch Surg 1991;126:9396.Google Scholar
10. DeJoy, DM, Gershon, RR, Murphy, LR, Wilson, MG. A work-systems analysis of compliance with Universal Precautions among health care workers. Health Educ Q 1996;23:159174.Google Scholar
11. Gerberding, JL, Lewis, FR Jr Schecter, WP. Are Universal Precautions realistic? Surg Clin North Am 1995;75:10911104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Gershon, R. Facilitator report: bloodborne pathogens exposure among health care workers. Am J Ind Med 1996;29:418420.Google Scholar
13. Hammond, JS, Eckes, JM, Gomez, GA, Cunningham, DN. HIV, trauma, and infection control: Universal Precautions are universally ignored. J Trauma 1990;30:555558.Google Scholar
14. Michalsen, A, Delclos, GL, Felknor, SA, Davidson, AL, Johnson, PC, Vesley, D, et al. Compliance with Universal Precautions among physicians. J Occup Environ Med 1997;39:130137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Saghafi, L, Raselli, P, Francillon, C, Francioli, P. Exposure to blood during various procedures: results of two surveys before and after the implementation of Universal Precautions. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:5357.Google Scholar
16. Roy, E, Robillard, P. Effectiveness of and compliance to preventive measures against the occupational transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994;20:393400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Williams, CO, Campbell, S, Henry, K, Collier, P. Variables influencing worker compliance with Universal Precautions in the emergency department. Am J Infect Control 1994;22:138148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Schillo, BA, Reischl, TM. HIV-related knowledge and precautions among Michigan nurses. Am J Public Health 1993;83:14381442.Google Scholar
19. Jeffe, DB, Mutha, S, L'Ecuyer, PB, Kim, LE, Singal, RB, Evanoff, BA, et al. Healthcare workers' attitudes and compliance with Universal Precautions: gender, occupation, and specialty differences. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:710712.Google Scholar
20. Friedland, LR, Joffe, M, Wiley, JF 2d Schapire, A, Moore, DF. Effect of educational program on compliance with glove use in a pediatric emergency department. Am J Dis Child 1992;146:13551358.Google Scholar
21. Moore, S, Goodwin, H, Grossberg, R, Toltzis, P. Compliance with Universal Precautions among pediatric residents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:554557.Google Scholar
22. Eustis, TC, Wright, SW, Wrenn, KD, Fowlie, EJ, Slovis, CM. Compliance with recommendations for Universal Precautions among prehospital providers. Ann Emerg Med 1995;25:512515.Google Scholar
23. Willy, ME, Dhillon, G, Loewen, NL, Wesley, RA, Henderson, DK. Adverse exposures and Universal Precautions practices among a group of highly exposed health professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:351356.Google Scholar
24. Waddell, C. Perception of HIV risk and reported compliance with Universal Precautions: a comparison of Australian dental hygienists and dentists. J Dent Hyg 1997;71:1721.Google ScholarPubMed
25. Rabaud, C, Zanea, A, Mur, JM, Blech, MF, Dazy, D, May, T, et al. Occupational exposure to blood: search for a relation between personality and behavior. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:564574.Google Scholar
26. Henderson, DK, Lee, LM, Kawana, R, Fahey, BJ, Wesley, R, Schmitt, JM. Occupational bloodborne pathogen exposures: 12 years' experience and comparison with four teaching hospital in Japan. In: Program and Abstracts from the 38th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2000; New Orleans, LA: Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2000; Abstract 405.Google Scholar