Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T21:34:48.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patient Versus Healthcare Worker Risks in Needleless Infusion Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jack W. Shields
Jack W. Shields*
Affiliation:
Santa Barbara, California
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , February 1998 , pp. 86 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

References

1. Voss, A, Verweij, P, L'Ecuyer, PB, Fraser, VJ. Needleless intravenous systems (with reply). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:536,537.Google Scholar
2. McDonald, LC, Banerjee, S, Jarvis, W. Central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections (BSI) in intensive care unit patients associated with needleless access devices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18 (part 2):P24. Abstract 28.Google Scholar
3. L'Ecuyer, PB, Schwab, EO, Iadomarco, E, Barr, N, Aton, EA, Fraser, VJ. Randomized prospective study of the impact of three needleless systems on needlestick injury rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:803–808.Google Scholar
4. Danzig, LE, Short, IJ, Collins, K, Mahoney, M, Sepe, S, Bland, L, et al. Bloodstream infections associated with a needleless intravenous infusion system in patients receiving home infusion therapy. JAMA 1995;273:1862–1864.Google Scholar