Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Patient Involvement in Healthcare-Associated Infection Research: A Lexical Review

  • Ann Dadich (a1) and Mary Wyer (a2)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review examines patient involvement in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) research. Healthcare-associated infections represent an intractable issue with considerable implications for patients and staff. Participatory methodologies that involve patients in healthcare research are associated with myriad benefits.

DESIGN

Lexical review.

METHODS

PubMed was searched to identify all publications on patient involvement in HAI research since 2000; publications were also identified from the cited references. A lexical analysis was conducted of the methods sections of 148 publications.

RESULTS

The findings reveal that HAI research that actively involves patients and members of the public is limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient involvement is largely limited to recruitment to HAI studies rather than extended to patient involvement in research design, implementation, analysis, and/or dissemination. As such, there is considerable opportunity to further this important research area via alternative methodologies that award primacy to patient expertise and agency.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:710–717

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to Ann Dadich, PhD, School of Business, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC NSW, Australia 2751 (A.Dadich@westernsydney.edu.au).

References

Hide All
1. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
2. Seale, H, Novytska, Y, Gallard, J, Kaur, R. Examining hospital patients’ knowledge and attitudes toward hospital-acquired infections and their participation in infection control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:461463.
3. Srigley, JA, Furness, CD, Gardam, M. Interventions to improve patient hand hygiene: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2016;94:2329.
4. Staley, K, Minogue, V. User involvement leads to more ethically sound research. Clinical Ethics 2006;1:95100.
5. Staley, K. ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engag 2015;1:110.
6. Bergold, J, Thomas, S. Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion. Hist Soc Res 2012;37:191222.
7. Apker, J, Eggly, S. Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: considering the ideological discourse of morning report. Qualit Health Res 2004;14:411429.
8. National Institute for Health Research. Going The Extra Mile: Improving the Nation’s Health and Wellbeing Through Public Involvement in Research. London: National Institute for Health Research; 2015.
9. Staley, K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK: INVOLVE; 2009.
10. Ocloo, J, Matthews, R. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:626632.
11. Cook, T. Where participatory approaches meet pragmatism in funded (health) research: the challenge of finding meaningful spaces. Forum: Qualit Soc Res 2012;13 Art. 18.
12. Foster, V, Young, A. Reflecting on participatory methodologies: research with parents of babies requiring neonatal care. Int J Soc Res Method 2015;18:91104.
13. Tanner, D. Co-research with older people with dementia: experience and reflections. J Mental Health 2012;21:296306.
14. Harris, A, Pineles, L, Perencevich, E. Recognising the value of infection prevention and its role in addressing the antimicrobial resistance crisis. BMJ Qual Saf 2016. PMID: 28003479.
15. Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L, Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:S65S164.
16. World Health Organization. Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care-Associated Infection Worldwide: Clean Care Is Safer Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
17. Iedema, R, Hor, S-Y, Wyer, M, et al. An innovative approach to strengthening health professionals’ infection control and limiting hospital-acquired infection: video-reflexive ethnography. BMJ Innov 2015;1:157162.
18. Kangovi, S, Grande, D, Carter, T, et al. The use of participatory action research to design a patient-centered community health worker care transitions intervention. Healthcare 2014;2:136144.
19. Hewett, DG, Watson, BM, Gallois, C, Ward, M, Leggett, BA. Intergroup communication between hospital doctors. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:17321740.
20. Leximancer Manual. Brisbane, Queensland: Leximancer Pty Ltd; 2011.
21. Hepworth, N, Paxton, SJ. Pathways to help-seeking in bulimia nervosa and binge eating problems: a concept mapping approach. Int J Eat Disord 2007;40:493504.
22. Angus-Leppan, T, Benn, S, Young, L. A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Environ 2010;19:230244.
23. Understanding displays and outputs. Leximancer website. https://hypermancer.leximancer.com/faq/display_and_output.html#. Published 2013. Accessed March 21, 2013.
24. Thomas, DA. Searching for significance in unstructured data: text mining with Leximancer. Eur Educ Res J 2012;13:235256.
25. Ashok, N, Rodrigues, JC, Azouni, K, et al. Knowledge and apprehension of dental patients about MERS—a questionnaire survey. J Clin Diagnos Res 2016;10:5862.
26. Pantle, AC, Fitzpatrick, KR, McLaws, ML, Hughes, CF. A statewide approach to systematising hand hygiene behaviour in hospitals: Clean hands save lives, Part I. Med J Australia 2016;191:S8S12.
27. Goldsack, JC, DeRitter, C, Power, M, et al. Clinical, patient experience and cost impacts of performing active surveillance on known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus positive patients admitted to medical-surgical units. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:10391043.
28. Ward, D. Infection control: reducing the psychological effects of isolation. Brit J Nurs 2009;9:162170.
29. Okada, J, Yamamizu, Y, Fukai, K. Effectiveness of hand hygiene depends on the patient’s health condition and care environment. Jap J Nurs Sci 2016;13:413423.
30. Wyer, M, Jackson, D, Iedema, R, et al. Involving patients in understanding hospital infection control using visual methods. J Clin Nurs 2015;24:1718–1712.
31. Schiffinger, M, Latzke, M, Steyrer, J. Two sides of the safety coin? How patient engagement and safety climate jointly affect error occurrence in hospital units. Health Care Manag Rev 2016;41:356367.
32. Gould, DJ, Drey, NS, Millar, M, Wilks, M, Chamney, M. Patients and the public: knowledge, sources of information and perceptions about healthcare-associated infection. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:18.
33. Dixon-Woods, M, Amalberti, R, Goodman, S, Bergman, B, Glasziou, P. Problems and promises of innovation: why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new. BMJ Qual Safety 2012;20:i47i51.
34. Ahmad, R, Iwami, M, Castro-Sánchez, E, et al. Defining the user role in infection control. J Hosp Infect 2016;92:321327.
35. Sotiriadou, P, Brouwers, J, Le, T-A. Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool. Ann Leisure Res 2012;17:218234.
36. Dadich, A. Citizen social science: a methodology to facilitate and examine workplace learning in continuing interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 2014;28:194199.
37. Dadich, A, Collier, A, Hodgins, M, Crawford, G. Using POSH VRE to examine positive deviance to new public management in healthcare. Qualit Health Res 2018; Epub ahead of print.
38. What is public involvement in research? Involve website. http://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/. Published 2015. Accessed January 23, 2016.
39. National Institute for Health Research. Public and Patient Involvement: Information for Researchers. Southampton, CT: National Institute for Health Research; 2013.
40. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed