Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Infection and Antibiotic Use in a Community Hospital, 1971-1990

  • Thomas S. Huth (a1) and John P. Burke (a1)

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the prevalence of infections and antibiotic use at a community hospital in 1990 and to compare the results with those from previous surveys in 1971, 1979, and 1984.

Design:

Point prevalence survey.

Setting:

Community teaching hospital.

Participants:

All hospitalized patients, excluding those on the nursery, psychiatry, and short-stay wards.

Intervention:

Medical records were reviewed and a pertinent physical examination was performed on each patient.

Results:

Overall, 46 (20.1%) of 229 patients had infection in 1990. Community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections were present in 26 (11.4%) and 24 (10.5%) of the patients, respectively. The most common site of community-acquired infection was the deep abdomen in 8 (25.8%) of 32 sites, while hospital-acquired infection most frequently involved the lower respiratory tract in 8 (25.0%) of 32 sites. Antimicrobial agents were being administered to 88 (38.4%) of the patients. Cephalosporins (particularly newer, broad-spectrum agents) were the most frequently used antibiotics, comprising 53 (45.3%) of the 117 total antimicrobial prescriptions. seven (18.4%) of the 38 antibiotics used for surgical prophylaxis were given for more than 48 hours. Trend analysis revealed no significant changes in the proportions of patients with community-acquired, hospital-acquired, or total infection over the last 20 years (p=.18, p=.12, and p=.O7, respectively). While the overall use of antibiotics increased p<.ool), the administration of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics for greater than 48 hours decreased p=.009).

Conclusions:

Despite major shifts in factors associated with an increased risk of infection, the overall prevalences of hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections remained remarkably constant during the last 20 years. Although total antibiotic use increased, the duration of surgical prophylaxis decreased and the pattern of use of therapeutic antibiotics also changed with increased use of broad-spectrum agents

Copyright

Corresponding author

Division of Infectious Diseases, LDS Hospital, 8th Ave. and C St., Salt Lake City, UT 84143

References

Hide All
1. Horan, TC, White, JW, Jarvis, WR, et al. Nosocomial infection surveillance, 1984. MMWR. 1986;35(suppl 1SS):17SS29SS.
2. Haley, RW, Culver, DW, White, JW, Morgan, WM, Emori, TG. The nationwide nosocomial infection rate: a new need for vital statistics. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:159167.
3. Haley, RW, Schaberg, DR, Von Allmen, S, McGowan, JE. Estimating the extra charges and prolongation of hospitalization due to nosocomial infections: a comparison of methods. J Infect Dis. 1980;141:248257.
4. Keys, TE. Selecting an antibiotic for the hosoital formulary. In: Wenzel, RR ed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1987:233242.
5. Maki, DG, Schuna, AA. A study of antimicrobial misuse in a university hospital. Am J Med Sci. 1978;275:271282.
6. Moody, ML, Burke, JP. Infections and antibiotic use in a large private hospital, January 1971. Arch Intern Med. 1972;130:261266.
7. Stevens, GP, Jacobson, JA, Burke, JI? Changing patterns of hospital infections and antibiotic use. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:587592.
8. Larsen, RA, Curtis, ET, Jacobson, JA, Burke, JI? Trends in infections and antibiotic usage in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control. 1987;15:715.
9. Adler, JL, Burke, JP, Finland, M. Infection and antibiotic usage at Boston City Hospital, January 1970. Arch Intern Med. 1971;127:460466.
10. Kislak, JW, Eickhoff, TC, Finland, ME. Hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic usage in the Boston City Hospital-January, 1964. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:834835.
11. Slama, TG, Sklar, SJ, Misinski, J, Fess, SW. Randomized comparison of cefamandole, cefazolin, cefuroxime prophylaxis in open heart surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;29:744747.
12. Nelson, RM, Jenson, CB, Peterson, CA, Sanders, BC. Effective use of prophylactic antibiotics in open heart surgery. Arch Surg. 1965;90:731736.
13. Evans, RS, Larsen, RA, Burke, JP, et al. Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use. JAMA. 1986;256:10071011.
14. Evans, RS, Pestotnik, SL, Burke, JP, Gardner, RM, Larsen, RA, Classen, DC. Reducing the duration of prophylactic antibiotic use through computer monitoring of surgical patients. Drug Intell Clin Pharm, Annals Pharmacother. 1990;24:351354.
15. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1989;31:105108.
16. The choice of antimicrobial drugs. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1990;32:4145.
17. Norris, S, Nightingale, CH, Mandell, GL. Tables of antimicrobial agent pharmacology In: Mandell, GL, Douglas, RG, Bennett, JE, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1990:434460.
18. Britt, MR, Schleupner, CJ, Matsumiya, S. Severity of underlying disease as a predictor of nosocomial infection. JAMA. 1978;239:10471051.
19. Brown, SW, Hollander, M. Statistics: A Biomedical Introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1977.
20. French, GL, Wong, SL, Cheng, AFB, Donnan, S. Repeated prevalence surveys for monitoring effectiveness of hospital infection control. Lancet. 1989;10211023.
21. Freeman, J, McGowan, JE. Risk factors for nosocomial infection. J Infect Dis. 1978;138:811819.
22. Maki, DG, Alvarado, CJ, Hassemer, CA, Zilz, MA. Relation of the inanimate hospital environment to endemic nosocomial infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:15621566.
23. Williams, REO. Infection control: the next 10 years. Am J Med. 1981;70:986.
24. Centers for Disease Control. Increase in national hospital discharge survey rates for septicemia-united States, 1979-1987. JAMA. 1990;263:937938.
25. Maki, DG. Nosocomial bloodstream infections. Program and Abstracts of the Third International Conference on Nosocomial Infections; Atlanta, Ga; July 30-August 3, 1990.
26. Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA, Samsa, GP. Changing frequencies of nosocomial pathogens in a university hospital. Program and Abstracts of the Third International Conference on Nosocomial Infections; Atlanta, Ga; July 30-August 3, 1990.
27. Jarvis, WR. Nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System, January 1980-April 1990. Program and Abstracts of the Third International Conference on Nosocomial Infections; Atlanta, Ga; July 30-August 3, 1990.
28. Schaberg, DR. Major trends in nosocomial bacterial pathogens. Program and Abstracts of the Third International Conference on Nosocomial Infections; Atlanta, Ga; July 30-August 3, 1990.
29. Aswapokee, N, Vaithayapicket, S, Heller, R. Pattern of antibiotic use in medical wards of a university hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:136141.
30. Pestotnik, SL, Evans, RS, Burke, JP, Gardner, RM, Classen, DC. Therapeutic antibiotic monitoring: surveillance using a computerized expert system. Am J Med. 1990;88:4348.
31. DiPiro, JT, Cheung, RPF, Bowden, TA, Mansberger, JA. Single dose systemic antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wound infections. Am J Surg. 1986;152:552559.
32. Avorn, J. Reduction of incorrect antibiotic dosing through a structured educational order form. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:17201724.
33. Woodward, RS, Medoff, G, Smith, MD, Gray, JL. Antibiotic cost savings from formulary restrictions and physician monitoring in a medical-school-affiliated hospital. Am J Med. 1987;83:817823.
34. Echols, RM, Kowasky, SE. The use of an antibiotic order form for antibiotic utilization review: influence on physicians' prescribing patterns. /Infect Dis. 1984;150:803807.
35. Kaiser, AB. Drug therapy: antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:11291138.
36. Hoffman, SA, Moellering, RC. The enterococcus: ‘putting the bug in our ears.’ Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:757761.
37. McGowan, JE. Antimicrobial resistance in hospital organisms and its relation to antibiotic use. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5:10331048.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed