Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T13:24:43.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implementation of an Interactive Computer-Assisted Infection Monitoring Program at the Bedside

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Alexandra Heininger ,
Adolf H. Niemetz ,
Martin Keim ,
Reinhold Fretschner ,
Gerd Döring  and
Klaus Unertl
Alexandra Heininger*
Affiliation:
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Adolf H. Niemetz
Affiliation:
Niemetz GmbH, Weisskirchen, Austria
Martin Keim
Affiliation:
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Reinhold Fretschner
Affiliation:
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Gerd Döring
Affiliation:
Department of General and Environmental Hygiene, Hygiene Institute, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Klaus Unertl
Affiliation:
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
*
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new computer-assisted infection monitoring (CAI) software program has been developed for use in an intensive-care unit (ICU). By means of an interactive dialogue with physicians at the bedside, infection diagnoses and therapeutic decisions were recorded prospectively during a 3-month test period. By linking epidemiological data with information about therapeutic decisions, CAI could assess the quality of the therapeutic decisions. Antibiotics chosen empirically before the availability of any culture results, matched the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the subsequently identified pathogens in 74% of the cases. Therapy chosen in collaboration with the computer after the pathogen was known, but before sensitivity results were available, corresponded with the eventual antibiograms of the microorganisms in 90% of the cases. Data analysis by CAI allowed us to assess critically the diagnostic and therapeutic habits in our ICU. Using the query-by-example method, CAI automatically calculated device-associated infection rates.

Type
Information Management
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 444 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Spencer, RC. Epidemiology of infection in ICU's. Intensive Care Med 1994;20(suppl 4):S2–S6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Goldmann, DA, Weinstein, RA, Wenzel, RP, Tablan, OC, Duma, AJ, Gaynes, RP, et al. Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms in hospitals. JAMA 1996; 275:234–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Vincent, J-L, Bihari, DJ, Suter, PM, Bruining, HA, White, J, Nicolas-Chanoin, M-H, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infections in intensive care units in Europe—results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) study. JAMA 1995;274:639–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Gaynes, RP, Solomon, S. Improving hospital-acquired infection rates: the CDC-experience. Jt Comm Qual Improv 1996;22:457–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. French, GL. The use of personal computers in hospital infection control. J Hosp Infect 1991;18(suppl A):402–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Pittet, D, Safran, E, Harbarth, S, Borst, F, Login, P, Rohner, P, et al. Automatic alerts for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance and control: role of a hospital information system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:496–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chang, RWS, Jacobs, S, Lee, B. Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerised trend analysis of daily APACHE II scores corrected for organ system failure. Intensive Care Med 1988;14:558–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Garner, JS, Emori, WR, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. A report from the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Evans, S, Larsen, RA, Burke, JP, Gardner, RM, Meier, FA, Jacobson, JA, et al. Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use. JAMA 1986;256:1007–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Briceland, LL, Nightingale, CH, Quintiliani, R, Cooper, BW. Antibiotic streamlining from combination therapy to monotherapy utilizing an interdisciplinary approach. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:2019–2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Scarafile, PD, Campbell, BD, Kilroy, JE, Mathewson, HO. Computer-assisted concurrent antibiotic review in a community hospital. Am J Hosp Pharm 1985;42:313–315.Google Scholar
13. Gastmeier, P, Schumacher, M, Daschner, F, Riiden, H. An analysis of two prevalence surveys of nosocomial infection in German intensive care units. J Hosp Infect 1997;35:97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Martone, WJ, Gaynes, RP, Horan, TC, Danzig, L, Emori, TG, Monnet, D, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) semiannual report, May 1995. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:377–385.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Alvarez-Lerma, F, ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Study Group. Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 1996;22: 387–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Greco, PJ, Eisenberg, JM. Changing physicians' practices. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1271–1273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed