Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T00:42:21.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Healthcare worker perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technologies: Does technology performance matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2021

Deborah G. Druckerman ,
Nital Appelbaum ,
Jo Dee Armstrong-Novak ,
Nadia Masroor ,
Kaila Cooper ,
Michael P. Stevens ,
Emily Godbout ,
Gonzalo Bearman  and
Michelle E. Doll Open the ORCID record for Michelle E. Doll [Opens in a new window]
Deborah G. Druckerman
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
Nital Appelbaum
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
Jo Dee Armstrong-Novak
Affiliation:
VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Nadia Masroor
Affiliation:
VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Kaila Cooper
Affiliation:
VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Michael P. Stevens
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Emily Godbout
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Gonzalo Bearman
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Michelle E. Doll*
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia VCU Health System, Richmond, Virginia
*
Author for correspondence: Michelle E. Doll, E-mail: Michelle.Doll@vcuhealth.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Brief
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 42 , Issue 12 , December 2021 , pp. 1519 - 1520
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. World Health Organization website. https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/publications/hand-hygiene-2009/en/. Published 2009. Accessed April 18, 2021.Google Scholar
Hagel, S, Reischke, J, Kesselmeier, M, et al. Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:957–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cawthorne, K-R, Cooke, RPD. A survey of commercially available electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems and their impact on reducing healthcare-associated infections. J Hosp Infect 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellingson, K, Polgreen, PM, Schneider, A, et al. Healthcare personnel perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technology. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:1091–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, FD, Bagozzi, RP, Warshaw, PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989;35:982–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, ME, Masroor, N, Cooper, K, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of two electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:1194–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkatesh, V, Morris, MG, Davis, GB, Davis, FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Qtrly 2003:425–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergeant, ESG, 2018. Epitools epidemiological calculators. Ausvet website. http://epitools.ausvet.com.au. Accessed June 28, 2021.Google Scholar