Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:51:13.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guidelines for Prevention of Intravascular Infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Bryan P. Simmons ,
Thomas M. Hooton ,
Edward S. Wong  and
James R. Allen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 61 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1.Rhame, FS, Maki, DG, Bennett, JV. Intravenous cannula-associated infections. In: Bennett, JV, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1979:433–442.Google Scholar
2.Maki, DG, Weise, CE, Sarafin, HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296; 1305–1309.Google Scholar
3.Band, JD, Alvarado, CJ, Maki, DG. A semiquantitative culture technic for identifying infection due to steel needles used for intravenous therapy. Am J Clin Pathol 1979;72:980–984.Google Scholar
4.Maki, DG. Epidemic nosocomial bacteremias. In: Wenzel, RP, ed. Handbook of hospital-acquired infection. Boca Raton, Florida:CRC Press, Inc. 1981:371–512.Google Scholar
5.Goldmann, DA, Maki, DG, Bennett, JV. Intravenous infusion-associated infections. In: Bennett, JV, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. Boston. Little, Brown and Company, 1979:443–452.Google Scholar
6.Goldmann, DA, Martin, WT, Worthington, JW. Growth of bacteria and fungi in total parenteral nutrition solutions. Am J Surg 1973;126:314–318.Google Scholar
7.Melly, MA, Meng, HC, Schaffner, W. Microbial growth in lipid emulsions used in parenteral nutrition. Arch Surg 1975;110:1479–1481.Google Scholar
8.Tully, JL, Friedland, GH, Goldmann, DA. Complications of intravenous therapy with steel needles and small-bore teflon catheters. Am J Med 1981;70:702–706.Google Scholar
9.Moran, JM, Atwood, RP, Rowe, MI. A clinical and bacteriologie study of infections associated with venous cutdowns. N Engl J Med 1965;272:554–559.Google Scholar
10.Maki, DG, Band, JD. Study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointments in prevention of vascular catheter-related infection. Am J Med 1981;70:739–744.Google Scholar
11.Maki, DG, MacCormick, KN. Acetone “defatting” in cutaneous antisepsis. Crit Care Med 1981;9:202.Google Scholar
12.Dudrick, SJ, Diller, BG, Wilmore, DW. Long term venous catheterization in infants. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969; 129:805–808.Google Scholar
13.von Meyenfeldt, M, Stapert, J, Wesdorp, R, et al. Subclavian catheters: to tunnel or not to tunnel? J Parenter Enter Nutr 1979;3:511.Google Scholar
14.Buxton, AE, Highsmith, AK, Garner, JS, Stamm, WE, Dixon, RE, McGowan, JE. Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: Effects of changing administration sets. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:764–768.Google Scholar
15.Band, JD, Maki, DG. Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:173–178.Google Scholar
16.Maki, DG, Goldmann, DA, Rhame, FS. Infection control in intravenous therapy. Ann Intern Med 1973;79:867–887.Google Scholar
17.Lehmann, CR. Effect of refrigeration on bactericidal activity of four preserved multiple-dose injectable drug products. Am J Hosp Pharm 1977;34:1196–1200.Google Scholar

References

1.Maki, DG, Hassemer, CA. Endemic rate of fluid contamination and related septicemia in arterial pressure monitoring. Am J Med 1981;70:733–738.Google Scholar
2.Emergency Care Research Institute: Evaluation, blood pressure monitors. Health Dev 1975;5:8–22.Google Scholar
3.Lantiegne, KC, Civetta, JM. A system for maintaining invasive pressure monitoring. Heart Lung 1978;7:610–621.Google Scholar
4.McDowall, DG: Monitoring the brain. Anesthes 1976;45:117–134.Google Scholar
5.Finster, M, Petrie, RH. Monitoring of the fetus. Anesthes 1976; 45:198–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Banta, HD, Thacker, SB. Costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring: review of the literature. National Center for Health Services Research, 1979. (DHEW publication no. [PHS] 79-3245).Google Scholar
7.Stamm, WE, Colella, JJ, Anderson, RL, Dixon, RE. Ind welling arterial catheters as a source of nosocomial bacteremia. N Engl J Med 1975;292:1099–1102.Google Scholar
8.Weinstein, RA, Stamm, WE, Kramer, L, Corey, L. Pressure monitoring devices—overlooked source of nosocomial infection. JAMA 1976;236:936–938.Google Scholar
9.Buxton, AE, Anderson, RL, Klimek, J, Quintiliani, R. Failure of disposable domes to prevent septicemia acquired from contaminated pressure transducers. Chest 1978;74:508–513.Google Scholar
10.Retailliau, HF. Infection control with invasive pressure monitoring devices. APIC Journal 1979;7:13–17.Google Scholar
11.Band, JD, Maki, DG. Infections caused by arterial catheters used for hemodynamic monitoring. Am J Med 1979;67:735–741.Google Scholar
12.Gibbs, R, Jones, PM, Wilder, CJY. Internal fetal monitoring and maternal infection following cesarean section—prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:193–197.Google Scholar
13.Gassner, CB, Ledger, WJ. The relationship of hospital-acquired maternal infection to invasive intrapartum monitoring techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:33–37.Google Scholar
14.Hagen, D. Maternal febrile morbidity associated with fetal monitoring and cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1975;46:260–262.Google Scholar
15.Donowitz, LG, Marsik, FJ, Hoyt, JW, Wenzel, RP. Serratia marcescens bacteremia from contaminated pressure transducers. JAMA 1979;242:1749–1751.Google Scholar