Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T10:41:17.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli versus Klebsiella pneumoniae: Does type of germ really matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2018

Benjamin Davido*
Affiliation:
Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France
Pierre de Truchis
Affiliation:
Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France
Christine Lawrence
Affiliation:
Microbiologie, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France
Aurélien Dinh
Affiliation:
Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France
*
Author for correspondence: B. Davido, MD, MSc, Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Universitaire Raymond-Poincaré, Garches 92380, France E-mail: benjamin.davido@aphp.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

To the Editor—We read with great interest the recent article by Scheuerman et alReference Scheuerman, Schechner and Carmeli 1 showing that extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP) bloodstream infections (BSIs) differ significantly in terms of mortality (33.7% vs 17.4%; P=.016). Because their study concerns a highly relevant and popular topic, some points should be discussed.

First, ESBL-KP–infected patients were more often hospitalized in ICU than those infected by ESBL-EC (P<.001), partly due to a septic shock, which may explain such a high rate of mortality (33.7%) for a bloodstream infection (BSI). Indeed, the observed mortality rate for ESBL-KP was similar to the average mortality for those with gram-negative BSIs in the ICU (35%) according to the prospective EUROBACT International cohort study.Reference Tabah, Koulenti and Laupland 2 Also, ICU-acquired BSIs are associated with a 40% increase in the risk of 30-day mortality.Reference Adrie, Garrouste-Orgeas and Ibn Essaied 3 Therefore, it is hard to believe that such a difference could be accounted for in any statistical adjustment, and thus, it constitutes a selection bias.

Second, the main source of BSI was urinary tract in the ESBL-EC arm (P=.005), while it is acknowledged that the severity of urinary tract infection is not related to the presence of bacteremia.Reference Artero, Esparcia, Eiros, Madrazo, Alberola and Nogueira 4 Such data underly the hypothesis that ESBL-KP infections might have been more severe than those due to ESBL-EC. For instance, multidrug-resistant BSIs complicating respiratory tract infections have been associated with an increased mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–8.22).Reference Saliba, Saadeh and Bouchand 7

Third, no information is provided about the respective antimicrobial regimens between ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP patients. However, it is currently argued that carbapenem alternatives are associated with a higher mortality rate than carbapanems for the treatment of ESBL BSI. In fact, the MERINO trial by Harris et alReference Harris, Peleg and Iredell 5 was recently suspended due to an increase in mortality in the arm receiving piperacillin-tazobactam (12.3%) versus meropenem (3.7%).Reference Harris, Peleg and Iredell 5 Such data should have been discussed. Likewise, no information is provided on treatment duration or dose, which may have varied between the 2 groups in the present study.Reference Scheuerman, Schechner and Carmeli 1 Both factors play a role in the outcome of treatment, especially when used against multidrug-resistant organisms.Reference Davido, Bouchand and Dinh 6

Interestingly, we previously showed that BSI severity or mortality among spinal cord injury patients over 15 years was not related to the multidrug-resistant characteristics of the microorganism.Reference Saliba, Saadeh and Bouchand 7 Although our sample size was small (n<30), a closer look at the outcome between ESBL-EC (n=26) and ESBL-KP (n=13) did not reveal any statistical difference in terms of mortality rate (7.7% in each arm). Moreover, the mortality rates were similar for other ESBL microorganisms (Enterobacter spp, Morganella spp, and Proteus spp (n=21)), ~9.5% (P=.99, data not shown).

In fact, we believe that the findings of Scheuerman et al, which showed no impact of CTX-M isolates in comparison to other ESBL genotypes, might support the idea that the type of germ does not play a major role. Indeed, mortality seems more related to patient comorbidities and severity of infection, as shown in Table 2 of the article,Reference Scheuerman, Schechner and Carmeli 1 with significant discrepancies between the 2 groups in terms of length of stay to bacteremia (P=.017), source of infection (P=.005), ICU ward admission (P<.001) and underlying cardiovascular disease (P<.001). Moreover, in a rabbit model of sepsis induced by a multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, Zhou et alReference Zhou, Ren, Liu, Gu and Li 8 showed that mortality was higher for the rabbits infected by susceptible than those infected with multidrug-resistant strains.

Overall, the impact of ESBL-KP isolates on mortality rate might have been overestimated, in the light of the severity of the patient condition.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Potential conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Footnotes

Cite this article: Davido B, et al. (2017). Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli versus Klebsiella pneumoniae: Does type of germ really matter?. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2018, 39, 1137–1138. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.152

References

1. Scheuerman, O, Schechner, V, Carmeli, Y, et al. Comparison of predictors and mortality between bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:660667.Google Scholar
2. Tabah, A, Koulenti, D, Laupland, K, et al. Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:19301945.Google Scholar
3. Adrie, C, Garrouste-Orgeas, M, Ibn Essaied, W, et al. Attributable mortality of ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: impact of the source, causative micro-organism, resistance profile and antimicrobial therapy. J Infect 2017;74:131141.Google Scholar
4. Artero, A, Esparcia, A, Eiros, JM, Madrazo, M, Alberola, J, Nogueira, JM. Effect of bacteremia in elderly patients with urinary tract infection. Am J Med Sci 2016;352:267271.Google Scholar
5. Harris, PN, Peleg, AY, Iredell, J, et al. Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections due to ceftriaxone non-susceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp (the MERINO trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:24.Google Scholar
6. Davido, B, Bouchand, F, Dinh, A, et al. Reinforcement of an antimicrobial stewardship task force aims at a better use of antibiotics of last resort: the COLITIFOS study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017;50:142147.Google Scholar
7. Saliba, M, Saadeh, D, Bouchand, F, et al. Outcome of bloodstream infections among spinal cord injury patients and impact of multidrug-resistant organisms. Spinal Cord 2017;55(2). doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.176.Google Scholar
8. Zhou, Z, Ren, J, Liu, H, Gu, G, Li, J. Pandrug-resistant isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae causes less damage than drug-susceptible isolates in a rabbit model. Clin Invest Med 2011;34:E38E44.Google Scholar