Background: Contaminated healthcare surfaces can serve as reservoirs for the transmission of pathogens. Sensitive sampling methods are needed to investigate sources of pathogens for implementing effective disinfection strategies and thereby preventing environmental transmission. Conventional approaches employ swabs to sample environmental surfaces. Contact plates represent an alternative approach for sampling healthcare surfaces that does not require lab processing, though little is known about their performance. A contact plate is an agar plate that is overfilled with selective or nonselective media. It can be gently applied to the surface, then simply incubated at a temperature optimal for target organism (s), thus saving time and resources. Methods: In this study, contact plates containing trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (TSAII), foam swabs, and flocked swabs were evaluated for their ability to recover 4 pathogens that persist on healthcare surfaces. Stainless-steel coupons (4 in2) were inoculated with the following pathogens (102 CFU): Acinetobacter baumannii (AB, strain type 12), carbapenemase-producing KPC+ Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP; ATCC BAA-1705); methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300); and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE; Van A + 256). The plates were allowed to dry 1 hour. Sampling with CPs was performed in 2 ways; (1) a single contact plate was used to sample 1 stainless-steel surface and (2) a composite was collected by 3 sequential contact-plate samplings of the same stainless-steel surface. The contact plates were then incubated at 351C. Foam and flocked swabs were premoistened with phosphate-buffered saline + 0.02% polysorbate 80 (PBST) and were used to sample the stainless-steel coupons. Swabs were held for 1 hour and processed by sonication and vortexing in 5 mL of PBST, then the eluent was cultured and CFU counted. Mean percentage recoveries (%R) relative to the inoculum were calculated and compared. Results: When the %R for all 4 pathogens were pooled, the composite contact-plate sampling method yielded the highest, (P < .05) (66.0%; SD, 0.22), followed by the single contact plate method (39.7%; SD, 0.12), foam swab (32.9%; SD, 0.18), and flocked swab (20.3%; SD, 0.20). The composite contact plate method yielded the highest %R for VRE (102.1 %; SD, 0.17), and the lowest %R was observed when using flocked swabs to recover KP (6.3%; SD, 0.05). Conclusions: The contact-plate composite method may provide investigators with minimal environmental microbiology capacity an alternative method for environmental sampling and detection of organisms from surface areas (4 in 2) with low bioburden.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None